Disney Flacks Kids for Frackers; Nonviolent Protestors Charged with 'Terrorism' for Using Glitter
January 12, 2014
Peter Moskowitz / Al Jazeera America & Suzanne Goldenberg / The Guardian
Radio Disney and the Ohio Oil and Gas Energy Education Program are promoting fracking in elementary schools. "Rocking in Ohio," a pro-fracking program toured 26 elementary schools and science centers abd Radio Disney plans to bring the program to other states. Meanwhile anti-fracking protesters have been charged with "terrorism" for dropping a banner and glitter at an oil company headquarters.
Radio Disney's Pro-fracking Elementary School Tour Sparks Outrage
Peter Moskowitz / Al Jazeera America
(January 9, 2014) – An educational program funded by Ohio’s oil and gas industry and sponsored by Radio Disney has environmental activists -- and some parents -- up in arms over what they say is a hijacking of public education by hydraulic fracturing (fracking) interests, in a state sitting on billions of dollars’ worth of gas-rich shale.
The program, called Rocking in Ohio, went on a 26-stop tour of elementary schools and science centers across the state last month. It involves interactive demonstrations of how oil and gas pipelines work, and is led by three staffers from Radio Disney’s Cleveland branch. It is entirely funded by the Ohio Oil and Gas Energy Education Program (OOGEEP), which gets its money from oil and gas companies.
Radio Disney, a nationwide network of radio stations aimed at kids, has said it will take the tour to other states if it deems the program successful. The company could not be reached for comment in time for the publication of this story.
Environmental activists and parents have called the program “propaganda” for promoting a controversial industry. Fracking -- a process in which thousands of gallons of water and chemicals are injected into deep wells in order to break up rocks that contain natural gas or oil -- has been a boon to Ohio’s economy but has caused myriad environmental issues in the state.
Some who are concerned over the promotional program have taken to the Internet to vent their outrage, creating online petitions and social media campaigns urging Disney to back out of its relationship with the oil and gas group. The most popular petition currently has more than 75,000 signatures.
In each of the 26 demonstrations, a Radio Disney DJ named Taylor Bell directed teams of kids as they raced to build pipelines out of plastic straws. The first team to get three pingpong balls through the “pipelines” won the game. The kids were cheered on by Radio Disney employees and teachers as pop music played in the background.
"Our country cannot survive without oil and gas,” OOGEEP’s Ron Grosjean told the Wooster, Ohio, Daily Record. “Kids are the best way (to spread the message). They retain (the information); they remember it."
According to several local media reports, the demonstrations seemed to be a hit. One said kids became “loud, noisy and raucous” in support of their teams.
Environmentalists are less enthusiastic.
“I don’t think it’s doing the children or the state of Ohio any good,” said Robert Shields, chair of the Sierra Club's Ohio chapter. “Kids’ ability to reason is not yet quite established, so it feels to me that they’re getting some kind of propaganda.”
OOGEEP pointed out in local media that the word “fracking” is never used during the demonstrations.
This is far from the first education program started by OOGEEP, which was founded in 1998 and has reached 100,000 students with its outreach initiatives, according to the organization’s website.
But it seems teaming up with a well-known national company like Disney crossed a line for some and created a firestorm.
"It's troubling in the first place that they're going into elementary schools, and it's even more troubling that Disney is getting involved," said Alison Auciello, an organizer with Food and Water Watch in Ohio. "They're not giving a balanced education on (oil and gas). Public schools should also be inviting anti-fracking people into schools. That doesn't seem to be happening at all."
Fracking has become more controversial as it has expanded in Ohio over the past few years. A recent investigation by The Associated Press found that drinking water in the state may have been contaminated by gas drilling. Also, a series of earthquakes in the city of Youngstown was linked to fracking in August.
But detractors have not been able to stop the industry from quickly gaining ground in the state. The most recent figures from Ohio’s Department of Natural Resources show that shale drilling led to twice as much oil and gas production in the third quarter of 2013 as in the same quarter of the year before.
Updated Jan. 9, 2014:
Disney emailed a statement to Al Jazeera, saying the company has pulled out of the remaining installments of the Rocking Ohio tour.
"The sole intent of the collaboration between Radio Disney and the nonprofit Rocking in Ohio educational initiative was to foster kids' interest in science and technology. Having been inadvertently drawn into a debate that has no connection with this goal, Radio Disney has decided to withdraw from the few remaining installments of the program," the statement read.
Terror Charges Faced by Oklahoma
Fossil Fuel Protesters 'Outrageous'
Suzanne Goldenberg / The Guardian
(January 10, 2014) -- The terror charges facing two environmental protesters who unfurled a banner and dropped glitter at an oil and gas company's office in Oklahoma are "outrageous" and "egregious", according to the lawyer representing them.
The authorities have already collected about 100 reports, including witness statements, surveillance video and other evidence to support the charges of terrorism hoax against the two protesters, Oklahoma City police told the Guardian.
The charge, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years, has yet to be confirmed by the Oklahoma city district attorney. If the charges do go ahead, it would be the first such use of Oklahoma's "terrorism hoax" statute in recent memory.
But the application of anti-terror statutes to a peaceful protest by barely a dozen activists has already caused outrage. Police concede there were no injuries in the protest.
"I have seen some pretty egregious stuff in my day, but these kind of charges are just outrageous and they are certainly the most egregious that I have seen," said Douglas Parr, lawyer for the two activists. "There is just no way the facts justify filing those charges."
Moriah Stephenson, 27, a waitress and graduate student, and Stefan Warner, 26, a youth pastor turned full-time organiser for the Great Plains Tar Sands Resistance, were part of a small group of about a dozen activists at the glass office tower housing Devon Energy on 13 December.
Devon, which is based in Oklahoma, is a leading player in oil and natural gas drilling and also has interests in Alberta's tar sands and the Keystone XL pipeline.
As the protest got under way, Stephenson and Warner broke off from the group, and made their way to the second floor overlooking the large public atrium.
They had no intention of getting arrested, Stephenson said. She had to study for finals. "Our plan was to do something safe," she said.
They quickly unfurled their banner, a red sheet with a gold mockingjay symbol and the words "The odds are never in our favor" – references from the Hunger Games books and films.
But to the protesters' dismay the glitter came unstuck, and began drifting towards the floor.
After a few uneventful minutes, Stephenson and Warner took down the banner and left the building – apologising to the janitor who came hurrying over with a broom.
A few people, clutching coffee cups, wandered around in the lobby below, according to Stephenson. But she did not detect much of a response to the banner. There wasn't even that much mess, she said. The pair had used just four small tubes of glitter on their two banners.
"A lot of people when they heard about it they imagined buckets of glitter being dumped on people running and screaming, and chaos and panic," Stephenson said. "It wasn't chaos and panic at all. It was a pretty boring protest until the police showed up and decided to make a big deal of everything."
But that was not how it was seen by either Devon Energy or the Oklahoma city police. According to the arrest report, a Devon security representative notified police of the protest and "an unknown black powdery substance".
"They seemed to be staging some type of protest," the report said. "There was fear the substance spilled out could have possibly been a hazardous material."
Captain Dexter Nelson, an Oklahoma city police spokesman, went even further, saying the glitter had set off a panic.
He said residents still carried the psychological scars of the 1995 Oklahoma city bombing, when 169 people were killed and hundreds more injured.
"From the totality of the incident when they unveiled the banners and this black powder went flying through the air, all of the people who saw it deemed that it had to be something dangerous or toxic and went into a panic," Nelson said. "From what I was told people were running around and thinking that it was something dangerous."
Nelson also said the protesters were covered in faeces – a claim the protesters and Parr denied.
"At least one of the individuals had faeces on their clothing and they were dressed alike," Nelson said. "They looked like homeless people. They looked like some of our regular downtown transient."
He went on: "There was at least one individual that I saw she had it on her pants and her shoes," he said.
Parr, who was at the tower that morning, was outraged. "Any comment that either one of those people was covered in faeces is an absolute, unmitigated lie," he said.
In addition to terrorism hoax, Stephenson was charged with disorderly conduct, causing panic, and trespass. Warner was also charged with trespassing and disorderly conduct.
Two other protesters who had locked themselves to the doors of the building were also arrested. Cory Matthis and Caroline McNally face trespassing charges.
The final decision on a "terrorism hoax" prosecution now rests with the Oklahoma city district attorney, David Prater. He said he was still awaiting the full police report.
For Stephenson and Warner, however, the episode was evidence of a pro-industry bias in the heart of America's oil and natural gas boom.
"It sends a message to other activists that the price of dissent is very high," said Stephenson.
Warner said: "It's just a reminder of the consolidation of power between the state and private industry."
Prater rejected both arguments. "The information that some company or coalition of companies has trained law enforcement or in some way convinced law enforcement to use terror statues to go after peaceful protesters that is just not factual," he said. "That is not true in our jurisdiction. We are not under any influence at all from anyone."
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.