Caught Red-Handed: Washington Spending Billions in Attempt to Destabilize Ukraine
February 16, 2014
Paul Craig Roberts / Information Clearing House & Mike Whitney / Information Clearinghouse
Commentary: The protests in the western Ukraine are organized by the CIA, the US State Department, and by Washington. The purpose of the protests is to overturn the decision by the independent government of Ukraine not to join the EU. There are three countries that strand in the way of Washington's global hegemony -- Russia, China and Iran. Each government is targeted for overthrow and replacement by US-friendly rulers who would be installed to promote Washington's will.
Washington Orchestrated Protests Are Destabilizing Ukraine
Paul Craig Roberts / Information Clearing House
(February 12, 2014) -- The protests in the western Ukraine are organized by the CIA, the US State Department, and by Washington- and EU-financed Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) that work in conjunction with the CIA and State Department. The purpose of the protests is to overturn the decision by the independent government of Ukraine not to join the EU.
The US and EU were initially cooperating in the effort to destroy the independence of Ukraine and make it a subservient entity to the EU government in Brussels. For the EU government, the goal is to expand the EU. For Washington the purposes are to make Ukraine available for looting by US banks and corporations and to bring Ukraine into NATO so that Washington can gain more military bases on Russia's frontier.
There are three countries in the world that are in the way of Washington's hegemony over the world -- Russia, China, and Iran. Each of these countries is targeted by Washington for overthrow or for their sovereignty to be degraded by propaganda and US military bases that leave the countries vulnerable to attack, thus coercing them into accepting Washington's will.
The problem that has arisen between the US and EU with regard to Ukraine is that Europeans have realized that the takeover of Ukraine is a direct threat to Russia, which can cut Europe off from oil and natural gas, and if there is war completely destroy Europe. Consequently, the EU became willing to stop provoking the Ukraine protests.
The response of the neoconservative, Victoria Nuland, appointed Assistant Secretary of State by the duplicitous Obama, was "fuck the EU," as she proceeded to describe the members of the Ukraine government that Washington tended to impose on a people so unaware as to believe that they are achieving independence by rushing into Washington's arms.
I once thought that no population could be as unaware as the US population. But I was wrong. Western Ukrainians are more unaware than Americans.
The orchestration of the "crisis" in Ukraine is easy. The neoconservative Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland told the National Press Club in Washington on December 13, 2013, that the US has "invested" $5 billion in agitation in Ukraine. The crisis essentially resides in western Ukraine where romantic ideas about Russian oppression are strong and the population is less Russian than in the eastern Ukraine.
The hatred of Russia in western Ukraine is so dysfunctional that the duped protesters are unaware that joining the EU means the end of Ukraine independence and rule by the EU bureaucrats in Brussels, the European Central Bank, and US corporations.
Perhaps Ukraine is two countries. The western half could be given to the EU and US corporations, and the eastern half could be reincorporated as part of Russia, where the entire Ukraine resided for as long as the US has existed.
The disaffection from Russia that exists in western Ukraine makes it easy for the EU and US to cause trouble. Those in Washington and Europe who wish to destroy Ukraine's independence portray an independent Ukraine as a hostage of Russia, while a Ukraine in the EU is allegedly under the protection of the US and Europe.
The large sums of money that Washington funnels into NGOs in Ukraine propagate this idea and work the population into a mindless frenzy. I have never in my life witnessed people as mindless as the Ukrainian protesters who are destroying the independence of their country.
The US- and EU-financed NGOs are fifth columns designed to destroy the independence of the countries in which they operate. Some pretend to be "human rights organizations." Others indoctrinate people under cover of "education programs" and "building democracy." Others, especially those run by the CIA, specialize in provocations such as "Pussy Riot."
Few if any of these NGOs are legitimate. But they are arrogant. The head of one of the NGOs announced prior to the Iranian elections (in which Mousavi was Washington's and the CIA's candidate) that the election would result in a Green Revolution. He knew this in advance, because he had helped to finance it with US taxpayer dollars. I wrote about it at the time. It can be found on my website, www.paulcraigroberts.org and in my just published book, How America Was Lost.
The Ukrainian "protesters" have been violent, but the police have been restrained. Washington has a vested interest in keeping the protests going in the hopes of turning the protests into revolt so that Washington can grab Ukraine. This week the US House of Representatives passed a resolution threatening sanctions should the violent protests be put down by the police.
In other words, if the Ukrainian police behave toward violent protesters in the way that US police behave toward peaceful protesters, it is reason for Washington to interfere in the internal affairs of Ukraine.
Washington is using the protests to destroy the independence of Ukraine and has ready the list of puppets that Washington intends to install as Ukraine's next government.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. PCR's new book, >i>HOW AMERICA WAS LOST, is now available: http://www.claritypress.com/RobertsAnthology.html
Caught Red Handed
Secret Tape Reveals US-backed Plot to
Topple Ukraine's Democratically-Elected President
Mike Whitney / Information Clearinghouse
"In the latest debacle for the US State Department and the Obama Administration, US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland was caught on tape micro-managing Ukraine opposition party strategies with US Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt. That the Ukraine regime-change operation is to some degree being directed from Washington can no longer be denied. . . .
The taped conversation demonstrates in clear detail that while Secretary of State John Kerry decries any foreign meddling in Ukraine's internal affairs, his State Department is virtually managing the entire process."
-- Daniel McAdams, "‘F**k the EU' Tape Reveals US Runs Ukraine Opposition," Ron Paul Institute
(February 12, 2014) -- Washington is at it again, up to its old tricks. You'd think that after the Afghanistan and Iraq fiascos someone on the policymaking team would tell the fantasists to dial-it-down a bit. But, no. The Obama claque is just as eager to try their hand at regime change as their predecessors, the Bushies.
This time the bulls-eye is on Ukraine, the home of the failed Orange Revolution, where US NGOs fomented a populist coup that brought down the government and paved the way for years of social instability, economic hardship and, eventually, a stronger alliance with Moscow.
That sure worked out well, didn't it? One can only wonder what Obama has in mind for an encore.
Let's cut to the chase: The US still clings to the idea that it can dominate the world with its ham-fisted military (that hasn't won a war in 60 years) its scandalized Intel agencies, its comical Rambo-style "Special Ops" teams, and its oh-so-brilliant global strategists who think the days of the nation-state will soon be over hastening the onset of the glorious New World Order.
Right. Ukraine is a critical part of that pipe dream, er, strategy which is why the US media puts demonstrations in Kiev in the headlines while similar protests in the US are consigned to the back pages just below the dog food ads. In any event, the crisis is likely to intensify in the months ahead as Washington engages in a no-holds-barred tug-o-war with Moscow over the future of civilization.
For bigwig strategists, like Zbigniew Brzezinski, Ukraine is a war that Washington must win to maintain its position as the world's only superpower. As he sees it, the US must establish outposts throughout Eurasia to diminish Russia's influence, control China, and capitalize off the new century's fastest growing region. Here's how Brzezinski sums it up in Foreign Affairs in an article titled "A Geostrategy for Eurasia":
"America's emergence as the sole global superpower now makes an integrated and comprehensive strategy for Eurasia imperative. . . . Eurasia is home to most of the world's politically assertive and dynamic states. All the historical pretenders to global power originated in Eurasia. The world's most populous aspirants to regional hegemony, China and India, are in Eurasia, as are all the potential political or economic challengers to American primacy. . . .
Eurasia is the world's axial supercontinent. A power that dominated Eurasia would exercise decisive influence over two of the world's three most economically productive regions, Western Europe and East Asia. A glance at the map also suggests that a country dominant in Eurasia would almost automatically control the Middle East and Africa. . . .
What happens with the distribution of power on the Eurasian landmass will be of decisive importance to America's global primacy and historical legacy." ("A Geostrategy for Eurasia," Zbigniew Brzezinski, Foreign Affairs, 1997)
Okay, so the not-so-subtle Brzezinski is telling US policymakers that if they want to rule the world, they've got to take over Eurasia. That's pretty clear. It's the Great Game all over again and Ukraine is one of the biggest trophies, which is why the US has allied itself to all kinds crackpot, rightwing groups that are stirring up trouble in Kiev. It's because Washington will stop at nothing to achieve its objectives.
Of course, there's nothing new about any of this. The US frequently supports violent, far-right organizations if their interests coincide. Here's a little background on the topic from Eric Draitser in an article in CounterPunch titled "Ukraine and the Rebirth of Fascism":
"In an attempt to pry Ukraine out of the Russian sphere of influence, the US-EU-NATO alliance has, not for the first time, allied itself with fascists. Of course, for decades, millions in Latin America were disappeared or murdered by fascist paramilitary forces armed and supported by the United States.
"The mujahideen of Afghanistan, which later transmogrified into Al Qaeda, also extreme ideological reactionaries, were created and financed by the United States for the purposes of destabilizing Russia. And of course, there is the painful reality of Libya and, most recently Syria, where the United States and its allies finance and support extremist jihadis against a government that has refused to align with the US and Israel.
"There is a disturbing pattern here that has never been lost on keen political observers: the United States always makes common cause with right wing extremists and fascists for geopolitical gain." ("Ukraine and the Rebirth of Fascism," Eric Draitser, CounterPunch)
Death squads here, jihadis there; what difference does it make to the big shots in Washington?
Not much, apparently.
But, wait, what's all this talk about the US being on the side of anti-Semites and fascists in Ukraine? Is that true?
It sure looks that way. In fact, there was a funny story in the World Socialist Web Site about Assistant Secretary of State Victoria "Fuck the EU" Nuland, which shows how far these people will go to achieve their objectives.
In this case, Nuland, who -- according to the WSWS -- is "the grand-daughter of Jewish immigrants who fled to America to escape pogroms in Tsarist Russia". . . was seen "handing out cookies in Maidan Square to Svoboda thugs who venerate the mass murderers of Hitler's SS." ("Leaked Phone Call on Ukraine Lays Bare Washington's Gangsterism," Bill Van Auken, World Socialist Web Site.)
Nice, eh? So Vickie was having a little snack-time with guys who'd probably shove a knife in her back if they were given half a chance. That's what you call dedication.
By the way, Nuland's husband is Robert Kagan, the "right-wing foreign policy pundit who served as the founding chairman of the Project for a New American Century, the neo-conservative Washington think tank that played a key role in the political and ideological preparation for the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan."
The fact that Obama and Co. are directly involved in this latest would-be coup, doesn't surprise anyone. According to a recent poll conducted by the All-Russian Public Opinion Research Center, "almost a half (45%) of Russian citizens think that protests in Ukraine have been provoked by Western special services."
By "special services" we presume the survey's authors mean US Intel agencies and US-funded NGOs, which have a long history of poking their noses in other country's affairs.
Here's a statement by Rep Ron Paul in 2004 to the US House International Relations Committee, which helps to throw a little light on the issue:
"It is clear that a significant amount of US taxpayer dollars went to support one candidate in Ukraine…. What we do not know, however, is just how much US government money was spent to influence the outcome of the Ukrainian election.
:Dozens of organizations are granted funds under the PAUCI program alone, (Poland-America-Ukraine Cooperation Initiative, which is administered by the US-based Freedom House.) and this is only one of many programs that funneled dollars into Ukraine.
"We do not know how many millions of US taxpayer dollars the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) sent to Ukraine through NED's National Democratic Institute and International Republican Institute. Nor do we know how many other efforts, overt or covert, have been made to support one candidate over the other in Ukraine.
"That is what I find so disturbing: there are so many cut-out organizations and sub-grantees that we have no idea how much US government money was really spent on Ukraine, and most importantly how it was spent."
("What Has the NED Done in Ukraine?" Ron Paul, Lew Rockwell.)
The fact is, the USG gives away tons of money to all types of shady groups who carry out their agenda. As far as Ukraine is concerned, we actually have a better idea of the money that's been spent than Paul thinks.
Check out this video of Nuland addressing various industry groups and admitting that, "Since the declaration of Ukrainian independence in 1991, the United States supported the Ukrainians in the development of democratic institutions and skills in promoting civil society and a good form of government. . . . We have invested more than 5 billion dollars to help Ukraine to achieve these and other goals."
("Washington's cloned female warmongers," Finian Cunningham, Information Clearinghouse.)
Five billion smackers to topple a democratically-elected government in Ukraine while 8 million Americans still can't find a damn job in the US. That tells you a lot about Obama's priorities, doesn't it?
Last week's fiasco surrounding Nuland's leaked phone conversation has clarified what's really going on behind the scenes. While the media has focused on Nuland's obscenity ("Fuck the EU"), it's the other parts of the conversation that grabbed our attention.
Here's a brief summary by the WSWS's Bill Van Auken:
"The call (exposes) the criminal and imperialist character of US policy in Ukraine . . . . What the tape makes clear, is that Washington is employing methods of international gangsterism, including violence, to effect a political coup aimed at installing a regime that is fully subordinate to US geo-strategic interests…
"The precise goal of US efforts is to shift political power into the hands of a collection of Western-aligned Ukrainian oligarchs who enriched themselves off of the private appropriation – theft -- of state property carried out as part of the Stalinist bureaucracy's dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.
"In doing so, it aims to turn Ukraine into a US imperialist beachhead on the very border of Russia, whose territory it also wants to divide and subjugate to neocolonial status as part of its drive to assert American hegemony throughout the strategic landmass of Eurasia…
"Nuland makes clear that behind the scenes, Washington is dictating which leaders of the opposition…should enter the government to swing it behind Washington and what role the others will play…"
("Leaked Phone Call on Ukraine Lays Bare Washington's Gangsterism," Bill Van Auken, World socialist Web Site.)
Same old, same old. Like we said earlier, there's nothing new here, nothing at all. All the blabber about "democracy" is just public relations crappola. It means nothing.
US elites want to trim Moscow's wings, set up shop in Eurasia, control China's growth, be a bigger player in the continent's oil and natural gas markets, export its financial services model, and make as much money as possible in the 21st century's hottest market, Asia.
It's all about profits. Profits and power.
But then, you probably knew that already.
Mike Whitney lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.