Environmentalists Against War
Home | Say NO! To War | Action! | Information | Media Center | Who We Are

 

 

Having Failed to Properly Train the Iraqi Army, the Pentagon Will Be Given Billions More to 'Train' 'Moderate' 'Rebels' to Topple Syria's Government


January 18, 2015
Alalam & Global Research & Alexander Nekrassov / Al Jazeera America

The Pentagon spent between $26 billion and $40 billion to equip and train the Iraqi army. But when ISIS forces moved from Syria and into Iraqi, the US-trained soldiers threw down their weapons, stripped off their uniforms and fled -- leaving behind a trove of US supplied military vehicles, weapons and ammunition. Now the US is giving the Pentagon another war-windfall to 'train' elements of the rebel insurgency that hopes (in theory) to replace the Syrian government with an unelected pro-US government.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/one-thousand-us-troops-to-train-syrian-moderate-opposition-rebels-in-saudi-arabia-turkey-qatar/5425182

One Thousand US Troops to Train
Syrian "Moderate Opposition Rebels"
in Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar

Alalam & Global Research

(January 17, 2015) -- The US military will send nearly 1,000 troops to train Syrian rebel forces as part of a long-planned effort to build up a "moderate opposition" to take on the ISIS group, the Pentagon said Friday.

The training will take place in Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar and is expected to start in the "early spring," spokesman Rear Admiral John Kirby told a news conference.

More than 400 trainers would start deploying in the next four to six weeks, backed by a similar number of support troops that will provide help with logistics, communications and intelligence, he said.

The total troop number "for this mission could approach 1,000," Kirby said. "It might even exceed that."

About 5,400 Syrian rebels would be trained and armed in the first year of the program, with an initial group of fighters possibly ready to enter battle "before the end of the year," he said.

The US Congress backed legislation last month to fund the training and equipping "moderate Syrian rebels", allocating about $500 million for the Syrian effort.

But President Barack Obama has been accused of moving too slowly to help the opposition while the ISIS group and other hardline extremists have taken on an increasingly dominant role on the battlefield.

Obama, wary of having the US drawn into Syria's multi-sided civil war, had long kept what he called "moderate rebels" at arm's length. But the rise of the ISIS group last year prompted a change in strategy, with the US president announcing plans in September to train and arm the opposition.

The US administration, however, has placed a priority on fighting the ISIS militants rather than President Bashar al-Assad's government, an emphasis that has led to disagreements with some allies, including Turkey.

The Pentagon made no mention of Assad in announcing the training effort.

The American troops will complement a small CIA training program that is already in place but officials declined to discuss whether the military would oversee the spy agency's efforts.

Two other countries also have pledged to help train the Syrian fighters, but officials did not say which governments or how many trainers they would contribute.

US intelligence agencies and foreign partners are working to identify potential recruits for the training program, who will then be vetted to ensure they have no ties to the ISIS group or other extremists, officials said.

Major General Michael Nagata, who is overseeing the US-led fight against the ISIS terrorists in Syria, met a range of opposition figures in Istanbul earlier this week and came away encouraged, Kirby said.

To avoid a repeat of insider attacks that have plagued the military training mission in Afghanistan, a portion of the US troops to be deployed would focus on security for their compatriots, he said.

In Iraq, US troops already have started training Iraqi government and Kurdish forces in the fight against the IS jihadists, with about 2,100 Americans deployed there.



The Staggering Failure of
US-trained Foreign Troops

Why the mainstream US media hasn't gone for the juicy bone that is the obvious corruption in the US military

Alexander Nekrassov / Al Jazeera America

(October 16, 2014) -- As ISIL fighters continue to gain ground in Iraq, expanding the borders of their self-proclaimed caliphate, even with the US-led coalition's aerial bombardment underway, the question pundits ought to be asking is what the Pentagon has to show for the vast amounts of money it has spent towards "training" foreign troops.

Let's face it: for an army that has received at least $26 billion -- or up to $40 billion if Russian estimates are to be believed -- worth of training by the US, the Iraqi army turned out to be totally unprepared when confronted with the ISIL onslaught.

In June, around 800 to 1,000 ISIL fighters entered Iraq from Syria, sending tens of thousands of Iraqi soldiers running for their lives in the west of the country, leaving their hardware and even small arms behind. That's a pretty damning image of an army that had been trained by the best of the best -- the mighty US armed forces -- at considerable cost to US taxpayers.

It's really amazing that in all the confusion that surrounds ISIL's many military successes in Iraq, mainstream US media hasn't gone for the juicy bone that is the obvious corruption in the US military.

Whatever you think of ISIL and the people who run it -- mostly Saddam Hussein's former officers, who, incidentally, had the wisdom and the cunning to vanish without a struggle during the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 -- it is still striking that the Iraqi army, armed with US weapons and hardware, has been unable to stop the onslaught of a group of extremists. Incidentally, it is worth nothing that this is something that the Russians both predicted and warned the Americans about.

Misuse of Money?
If one considers that ISIL has no air support, and that its fighters are not so numerous in strength even now, we are looking at some serious misuse of money by the Pentagon -- not to mention gross incompetence on the part of its instructors.

Since the Vietnam War, the US armed forces have had precious little to boast about when it comes to military victories. I sometimes wonder whether the reputation of the US army has not been created solely by Hollywood films and US TV dramas like "Band of Brothers".

The Russian website repin.info made an effort recently to come up with some figures that shed some light on corruption during the war in Iraq. It reports some absolutely astonishing facts like electric plugs valued at $900 each for the US troops there when their real price was something like $5 and short piping costing $1.50 which went for $80.

Things got even more interesting when it was alleged that the Pentagon used a phony Alaska company to channel all contracts concerning Iraq with no paperwork available.

But now another problem with US training of foreign troops is coming to head, as NATO is pulling out of Afghanistan, with 140,000 troops having been cut down to just over 50,000.

We were always told by the Pentagon and NATO that the main purpose of keeping the troops in Afghanistan was to prevent the country ever being used as a training ground by terrorists -- keeping terrorists off American streets, so to speak -- and to train the Afghan army, to cope with the Taliban by itself.

Taliban Successes
The current number of the Afghan armed forces stands at an impressive 200,000, with another 60,000 planned to be added next year, and with nearly 4,000 US instructors involved in their training. Yet, all we hear about is the successes of the Taliban in controlling vast parts of the country and the possible eventual take-over of the country, once the bulk of NATO troops withdraw.

If we consider that the US has spent something like $55 billion on training the Afghan army and police, we can safely assume, taking Iraq into consideration, that we will see a similar situation on the ground once NATO has gone -- that is, the Taliban moving in and taking over without any serious hassle.

Nevertheless, despite the obvious flaws in training troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, we are still hearing calls to send US instructors to the countries where the security situation is deteriorating.

Take Nigeria where the armed group Boko Haram has been scoring serious successes in the north and has even announced the creation of its own mini-caliphate in the north, following ISIL's footsteps in Iraq and Syria.

A great deal of criticism has targeted the government of President Goodluck Jonathan for failing to organise a serious military response to the Boko Haram advance, with growing calls to increase the number of US advisers and instructors on the ground there.

But with images of the Iraqi army retreating from ISIL fighters, should that not serve as a dismal prognosis of what might ensue if the Yanks start training the Nigerian army, too?

Alexander Nekrassov is a former Kremlin and government adviser.

Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.

back

 

 

Stay Connected
Sign up to receive our weekly updates. We promise not to sell, trade or give away your email address.
Email Address:
Full Name:
 

 

Search Environmentalists Against War website

 

Home | Say NO! To War | Action! | Information | Media Center | Who We Are