Iran Open to a 'Fair Nuclear Compromise': Israel Threatens to Attack
February 17, 2015
Agence France-Presse & Mehrdad Balali and Shadia Nasralla / Reuters
Iran's supreme leader said on Sunday he could accept a compromise in nuclear talks and gave his strongest defense yet of President Hassan Rouhani's decision to negotiate with the West, a policy opposed by powerful hardliners at home. Meanwhile, in Israel, Intelligence Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz warned that Israel could act unilaterally against Iran over its nuclear drive, saying Tehran has failed to make concessions in talks with world powers.
Israel Warns Anew of Action against Iran
JERUSALEM (February 12, 2015) -- Intelligence Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz warned Thursday that Israel could act unilaterally against Iran over its nuclear drive, saying Tehran has failed to make concessions in talks with world powers.
"I won't be too specific but all options are still on the table," Steinitz told reporters. "We never limited Israel's right of self-defence because of some diplomatic constraints," he said.
Significant gaps remain between Iran and the P5+1 world powers on specific measures to end a 12-year standoff on Tehran's nuclear program.
Two deadlines for a permanent agreement have already been missed, since an interim accord was struck in November 2013.
The P5+1 -- Britain, China, France, Russia, the United States and Germany -- have now set a March 31 deadline for a political agreement. It would be followed by a final deal setting out all the technical points of what would be a complex accord by June 30
Iran denies seeking an atomic bomb and says its nuclear program is for peaceful energy purposes.
Steinitz said Iran has so far shown little or no flexibility on key issues such as uranium enrichment, destruction of related infrastructure and the fate of its Arak nuclear reactor and Fordow secret underground enrichment facility.
"Its a gloomy picture," said Steinitz, adding that he discussed it at last week's security conference in Munich with International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano.
"The Iranians didn’t move much. . . therefore we are so disturbed," he said. Steinitz said the agreement being thrashed out was "full of loopholes".
"If there is no agreement there is not agreement, but since we hear some optimism on both sides it seems to us that if there is an agreement by the end of March this means an agreement without Iran moving to significant progress. If this is the picture, how much can it change in one month?"
US Secretary of State John Kerry met his Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif at the Munich conference and stressed Washington's commitment to seeing the deadline met.
On Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted he has a "profound disagreement" with US President Barack Obama over the Iranian nuclear issue. Washington and Iran are now seen as the key players of any potential deal.
Iran's Khamenei Says Could Accept Fair Nuclear Compromise
Mehrdad Balali and Shadia Nasralla / Reuters
DUBAI/MUNICH (February 8, 2015) -- Iran's supreme leader said on Sunday he could accept a compromise in nuclear talks and gave his strongest defense yet of President Hassan Rouhani's decision to negotiate with the West, a policy opposed by powerful hardliners at home.
As his foreign minister met counterparties in the talks at a conference in Munich, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said he "firmly" backed a fair nuclear deal.
"I would go along with any agreement that could be made. Of course, if it is not a bad deal. No agreement is better than an agreement which runs contrary to our nation's interests," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told Iranian air force personnel, according to official news agencies.
In a speech that still underlined his suspicions about Western nations that he characterized as "bullies", Khamenei backed Rouhani's negotiations with them and said any workable deal would mean both sides easing their demands.
"As the president said, negotiations mean reaching a common point. Therefore, the other party . . . should not expect its illogical expectations to be materialized. This means that one side would not end up getting all it wants."
"I am for reaching a good settlement and the Iranian nation too will certainly not oppose any deal to uphold its dignity and integrity," Khamenei said, an apparent warning to hardliners that they might have to accept a deal with powers including the United States, commonly known in Iran as "the Great Satan".
Negotiators have set a June 30 final deadline for an accord, and Western officials have said they aim to agree on the substance of such a deal by March.
In Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who will address the US Congress on Iran on March 3 -- to the annoyance of the Obama administration -- said: "We will do everything and will take any action to foil this bad and dangerous agreement."
"World powers and Iran are charging ahead to an agreement that would allow Iran to arm itself with nuclear weaponry, something that would imperil the existence of the State of Israel," Netanyahu told his weekly cabinet meeting.
The nuclear talks with the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and France are aimed at clinching an accord that would ease Western concerns that Tehran could pursue a convert nuclear weapons program, in return for the lifting of sanctions that have ravaged the Iranian economy.
Major sticking points are the pace at which sanctions would be removed, the size of Iran's nuclear fuel-producing capacity -- a key consideration in preventing any output of bomb material -- and the length of any agreement.
"Our (nuclear) negotiators are trying to take the weapon of sanctions away from the enemy. If they can, so much the better. If they fail, everyone should know there are many ways at our disposal to dull this weapon," Khamenei said.
Any deal "must be concluded in one stage and consist of clear and detailed specifications, and not subject to (various) interpretations," he said.
"Given our past experience in dealing with the (West), a final draft must not leave any room for the other side to repeatedly extract concessions."
Separately, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif denied on Sunday a Reuters report quoting unidentified senior Iranian officials saying he had told the United States during the talks that Rouhani's political clout would be heavily damaged if negotiations failed.
"I believe the entire Iranian population understands that this government, that Dr Rouhani, his administration and the government in its entirety supported our efforts in the negotiations," Zarif told a security conference in Munich where he met counterparties in the negotiations, in what he called a "very serious discussion".
"Everybody has taken every necessary measure to make sure we succeed. All Iranians know this. If we fail, and I hope we won't, they (Iranians) will not consider us responsible for that failure. They will consider attempts (to ask) too much from Iran as a reason for failure."
Zarif said it was in everyone's interest to seal an agreement by the June 30 deadline, but added: "I don't think if we don't have an agreement it will be the end of the world."
US Senator John McCain, a hawkish Republican, warned in Munich that while Iran was negotiating now, its underlying goal was "to drive Western influence out of the Middle East".
(Additional reporting by Stephen Brown and Noah Barkin in Munich, Dan Williams in Jerusalem and Parisa Hafezi in Ankara; Writing by Stephen Brown; Editing by Mark Heinrich and Robin Pomeroy)
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.