Obama Fights Release of 2,000 US Torture Photos
December 19, 2015
Jonathan Turley / JonathanTurley.org & Ewan Palmer / International Business Times
President Obama once pledged that his government would be the most transparent in history -- a claim that is often mocked by civil libertarians and other critics who accuse him of almost Nixonian secrecy policies and inclinations. The Administration continues to fight to withhold over 2,000 images of torture and abuse of detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan simply because it would make the United States look bad.
Obama Administration Fights To Withhold Over
2,000 Photos Of Alleged US Torture and Abuse
Jonathan Turley / JonathanTurley.org
WASHINGTON, DC (December 15, 2015) -- President Obama once pledged that his government would be the most transparent in history -- a claim that is often mocked by civil libertarians and other critics who accuse him of almost Nixonian secrecy policies and inclinations. That troubling record is playing out again before US District Court Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The Administration continues to fight to withhold over 2,000 images of torture and abuse of detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan simply because it would make the United States look bad. Ironically, there is a transparent element to this case.
Few Administrations have been so transparently obvious in their use of classification rule to simply bar the disclosure of information that would be embarrassing to officials or the government.
Usually, the Justice Department attempts to spin a tale of some other national security rationale for non-disclosure. Here, however, there is nothing even plausible to come up with.
The Obama Administration simply wants to deep six the photos because people would be really angry if they saw what the government did, including photos that are believed to be far worse than those Abu Ghraib (like the one above).
Hellerstein gave the Justice Department until December 12th to come a rational explanation why each individual photograph has been withheld from the public. In 2009, Obama insisted that disclosing the photos would "further inflame anti-American opinion."
However, that rationale could be used for wholesale cover-ups and information controls by the government. The government never wants bad information to come out and would prefer to say that it is protecting the public from any backlash. This includes criticism of Obama's pledge, soon after being elected, not to allow the prosecution of officials responsible for the torture program.
Whatever the backlash, it is far more dangerous to allow the government to pick and choose what "bad news" or bad images will reach the public. The photographs are also important for historians and academics in fully documenting this period of history.
Such censorship is more likely to be an effort to manage domestic public opinion than it is extreme foreign elements. If Obama can do this on detainees, the next president can use the same power in countless other areas. Obama supporters have been willfully blind to the precedent that they are creating in such positions.
The Obama Administration has set the record for censoring information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The penchant for secrecy in this Administration is creating a new level of government control over information that will likely be replicated by the next Administration.
No administration wants to release negative information unless it has to do so. That latter prospect is now in the hands of Judge Hellerstein.
Obama Withholding 2,100 Iraq and Afghanistan
Torture Photos 'Worse than Abu Ghraib'
Ewan Palmer / International Business Times
(October 22, 2014) -- The Obama Administration has been given a December deadline to explain why it has withheld more than 2,000 graphic images depicting Iraqi and Afghanistan detainees being tortured by the US military.
A federal judge has ordered the US government to explain, one photograph at a time, why it blocked the images from being released to the public.
In addition to the photographs of hooded, naked and abused prisoners inside the infamous Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, which caused global outrage during the George W Bush era in 2004, a further 2,100 images showing possibly even more disturbing examples of torture and humiliation could also be released.
Federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein has given the US Justice Department until 12 December to give a rational explanation why each individual photograph has been withheld from the public.
After Hellerstein has heard the reasoning from the government, he will decide how many will be released, if any at all.
In 2009, President Barack Obama said the reasoning for blocking the release of the images was on the grounds they would "further inflame anti-American opinion" and "put our troops in greater danger".
Two former US secretaries of defense, Robert Gates in 2009 and Leon Panetta in 2012, also maintained the disclosure of the images would place US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan lives at risk.
The US military returned to Iraq this year as part of the ongoing battle against Isis (Islamic State), prompting further fears about the repercussion the release of the images might hold.
Marcellene Hearn, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), said it is important that the US government disclose the actions of the military for transparency purposes.
"The American people are entitled to know what took place in US detention centres," she said.
"And it would be completely backwards to suppress images of government misconduct on the grounds that they are too powerful to be disclosed when it is often disclosure, accountability and ensuing reforms that prevent misconduct from recurring."
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.