Donald Trump Thinks America Must Commit War Crimes
July 6, 2016 Eric Levitz / New York Magazine
Commentary: Hours after Tuesday's massacre at Ataturk International Airport, Donald Trump called on America to "fight fire with fire." The presumptive GOP nominee told supporters in Ohio that, while he likes waterboarding, it probably isn't "tough enough." Last December, the Republican front-runner revealed his big new idea for winning the war on terrorism: kill more women and children in the Middle East.
Donald Trump Thinks America Must
Commit War Crimes As a Matter of Principle Eric Levitz / New York Magazine
(July 5, 2016) -- Hours after Tuesday's massacre at Ataturk International Airport, Donald Trump called on America to "fight fire with fire." The presumptive GOP nominee told supporters in Ohio that, while he likes waterboarding, it probably isn't "tough enough."
"We have to be so strong," Trump said. "We have to fight so viciously. And violently because we're dealing with violent people viciously."
On Thursday night in New Hampshire, Trump reiterated his belief that America should hold itself to the same standard as a fascist death cult. Asked by local station NH1 to respond to Senator John McCain's claim that torture is "not the American way," Trump replied:
Well it's not the American way to have heads chopped off and have people drowning in steel cages ... And so we can have our disagreements, but we're going to have to get much tougher as a country. We're going to have to be a lot sharper and we're going to have to do things that are unthinkable almost.
That Donald Trump will happily court human beings' worst instincts for political gain is not breaking news. What's interesting about his renewed support for deliberate war crimes is that there's no evidence such heinousness even has a political upside. In the wake of the Orlando shooting, the American people were scared.
Eight in ten told pollsters from the Washington Post and ABC News that they were afraid of lone-wolf terrorism. But those respondents also overwhelmingly preferred Clinton's response to the tragedy over Trump's, and had more faith in her capacity to handle terrorism than they did in the mogul's.
This marks a departure from past campaign cycles, in which Republican candidates have consistently enjoyed higher marks than their Democratic rivals on matters of national security.
Part of this change can be explained by the unusually stark discrepancy between the two presumptive nominees' levels of foreign-policy experience. But in the previous Washington Post-ABC News poll, taken in May, Trump was only three points behind Clinton on the issue of terrorism; he fell 11 points behind her in the wake of Orlando.
Thus, it appears that the American people find a former secretary of State calmly laying out a detail-oriented plan for reducing terrorism to be more comforting than a real-estate mogul shouting that the nation must chose between his radical agenda and certain doom.
In light of this finding, it seems unfair to assume that Trump's pledge to do the "unthinkable" is motivated by crass political calculations. Rather, pundits should give the presumptive GOP nominee the benefit of the doubt, and assume his support for war crimes is a genuine expression of a deeply held faith in the cleansing power of sadistic violence.
(December 2, 2015) -- On Wednesday morning, Republican front-runner Donald Trump revealed his big new idea for winning the war on terrorism: kill more women and children in the Middle East.
In an interview with Fox and Friends, Trump laid out his plans for defeating ISIS, beginning, as always, with his vow to "hit them like they've never been hit before." But when co-host Brian Kilmeade asked Trump about the risk of civilian casualties, the candidate's policy thinking became decidedly more innovative. At first, Trump pledged to do "his absolute best" to minimize civilian casualties. But then he seemed to have second thoughts.
"We're fighting a very politically correct war," Trump observed. "And the other thing with the terrorists -- you have to take out their families. When you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families! They care about their lives, don't kid yourselves. They say they don't care about their lives. But you have to take out their families."
The Fox News morning crew appeared slightly jarred by Trump's prescription, and co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck abruptly shifted the discussion to immigration -- a topic on which the candidate's chief proposal is also, essentially, collective punishment.
A Quinnipiac poll released Wednesday morning shows that Trump remains Republican voters' top choice for commander-in-chief. At 27 percent support, the former reality star boasts a ten-point lead over his closest competitor, Florida senator Marco Rubio.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.