Crumbling Oligarchies and Media Manipulation Risk Nuclear WWIII
October 10, 2016
Russia Insider & Chronicles Magazine
A picture of a little boy pulled from the rubble of Aleppo after what was dubiously reported as a Russian airstrike -- promptly dubbed "Aleppo Boy" -- went viral in every prestige outlet in the US and Europe. Not long before, another little boy was beheaded on video by the Harakat Nour al-Din al-Zenkim, a "moderate" US-supported jihad terror group. The images of his grisly demise received far less media attention than those of official Aleppo Boy.
The Oligarchy Is Losing Its Grip, But Its Death Throes May Prove Fatal
Americans are beginning to question mainstream media in increasing numbers, but it may be too little too late
Russia Insider & Chronicles Magazine
Atrocity porn doesn't exist in isolation. Rather it is part of a well-established pattern. Whenever a US president, whether Democrat or Republican, plots a military intervention in another country, media dutifully parrot government-provided content.
(September 22, 2016) -- Several weeks ago, the mainstream media (MSM) gave saturation coverage to a picture of a little boy pulled from the rubble of Aleppo after his home and family were crushed in what was dubiously reported as a Russian airstrike. Promptly dubbed "Aleppo Boy," his dusty image immediately went viral in every prestige outlet in the United States and Europe.
The underlying message: we -- the "international community," "the Free World," the United States, you and I -- must "do something" top stop Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his main backer and fellow Hitler clone Vladimir Putin.
Not long before, another little boy, also in the area of Aleppo, was beheaded on video by the "moderate" US-supported jihad terror group Harakat Nour al-Din al-Zenki. The images of his grisly demise received far less media attention than those of official Aleppo Boy. This other kid received no catchy moniker.
No one called for anyone in power to "do something." In fact, Western support for the al-Zenki jihadists -- which the Obama administration refused to disavow even after the beheading and allegations of chlorine gas use by al-Zenki -- can itself be seen as part of "doing something" about the evil, evil Assad.
Another small detail readily available in "alternative media" but almost invisible in the MSM: Mahmoud Raslan, the photographer who took the picture of Aleppo Boy and disseminated it to world acclaim, also took a smiling selfie with the beaming al-Zenki beheaders of the other kid. But, hey, says Raslan, I barely know those guys. Now let's move on . . .
For those who have been paying attention for the past couple of decades, Aleppo Boy is a familiar example of what is known as "atrocity porn," titillating the audience through horror and incitement to hatred of the presumed perpetrators.
Atrocity porn has been essential for selling military action in "wars of choice" unconnected to the actual defense of the US:
incubator babies (Kuwait/Iraq);
the Racak massacre (Kosovo);
the Markale marketplace bombings,
Omarska "living skeletons,"
the Srebrenica massacre (Bosnia);
rape as calculated instrument of war (Bosnia, Libya); and
poison gas in Ghouta (Syria).
Never mind that the facts, to the extent they eventually become known, may later turn out to be very different from the categorical black-and-white accusations on the lips of western officials and given banner exposure with hours if not minutes of the event in question.
As I have detailed in a recently posted study, How American Media Serves as a Transmission Belt for Wars of Choice [See Abstract below], atrocity porn doesn't exist in isolation. Rather it is part of a well-established pattern.
Whenever a US president, whether Democrat or Republican, plots a military intervention in another country, media (particularly the MSM) dutifully parrot government-provided content. Among the key features analyzed:
* Deficiency of knowledge as the American norm: The less we know, them more likely we are to believe what we're being told. Those least informed are most persuaded of the need to "do something."
* Reliance on government sources, "ventriloquism," and information incest: Unknown to the public, much MSM "information" comes from government sources. Ask White House aide Ben Rhodes.
* Centralized corporate ownership: You can't serve both God and Mammon, but Caesar and Mammon get along just fine. Propaganda interfaces with ratings dollars for six giant corporate conglomerates.
* "Para-journalism," "infotainment," and "atrocity porn" as a war trigger: Once government decides on war, they need to sell it. The MSM duly serves up made-to-order atrocities.
* Demonization "Hitler" memes and "weaponization" of media: It's all black and white, no shades of gray. Compromise and negotiation have no role in confronting absolute evil. War is the default option.
* America and the "international community," the "Free World," and "American exceptionalism" and "leadership": What normal Americans understand by our country's "exceptional" character is very different from the malign use to which political and media elites put it.
* Disregarding "alternative" media, American samizdat: Accurate information is available in "alternative" media, but the MSM still decide if it exists or not.
* "We never make mistakes," "stay the course," and "MoveOn-ism": US policy has no rearview mirror. Authors of past disasters are not discredited. Those who said "tolya so" are ignored.
The media's acting as a transmission belt for war is best understood by seeing the MSM as themselves an integral part of a multifaceted, hybrid public-private entity encompassing an astonishing range and depth. Centered in Washington with secondary concentrations in New York and Silicon Valley, it is variously known as the Establishment, the Oligarchy (as called by Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions), or the Deep State (as analyzed in depth by my longtime Congressional colleague Mike Lofgren).
This entity includes elements within all three branches of the US government (especially in the military, intelligence, and financial sectors), private business (the financial industry, government contractors, information technology), think tanks, NGOs, the "Demintern," both political parties and campaign operatives, and an army of lobbyists and PR flacks. Students of history will note a startling resemblance to the old Soviet nomenklatura.
The Deep State not just Dwight Eisenhower's "Military-Industrial Complex." Compared to these guys, Curtis LeMay was a peacenik. The Oligarchy's propensity for war is inseparable from its media falsehood-generator.
As Solzhenitsyn observed: "Anyone who has proclaimed violence his method inexorably must choose lying as his principle." Both have become deeply engrained in our public life and especially in our foreign and military policies.
There is hope, though. Under assault from this year's anti-Establishment challenges from Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, the failure of Barack Obama's policies in Syria and Ukraine, and boiling anger from a shrinking American Middle Class, both the Oligarchy and its media component show signs of losing their grip.
Of particular note is growing public skepticism of the MSM in favor of digital "alternative media" across the political spectrum: Antiwar.com, OpEdNews, RonPaulInstitute.org, zerohedge.com, LewRockwell.com, Infowars.com, Counterpunch.com, Unz, Vdare, Takimag, Consortiumnews, and many others, including upstart independent conservative TV network One America News.
Some other publications are open to alternative views and serve as conduits to more mainstream opinion, such as Chronicles Magazine on the (genuine, not Neocon) Right, The Nation on the Left, the libertarian Reason, and the foreign policy realist publication The National Interest.
At the same time, the MSM increasingly must take note of "alternative" information in an attempt to preserve some of its diminishing credibility. The most obvious success in this regard is DrudgeReport.com, especially in its Trump-friendly coverage of the presidential race, with Breitbart also worth mentioning.
A growing segment of the American public is discovering a skill once well-honed by the citizens of the former communist countries: reading between the lines of the official media (which is assumed to be full of lies) and making informed comparisons to samizdat alternative media, foreign sources, and the rumor-mill to guess what the truth might be.
An encouraging sign is Obama's failure to herd the country into the Syrian war in 2013 in the face of an outpouring of public opposition across the political spectrum. The possibility exists for a peaceful evolution over the next few years to a less warlike posture that would refocus on America's domestic needs.
There is also grave, perhaps growing, danger. The Deep State's servitors and beneficiaries could risk a major war in a desperate bid to save their wealth, power, and privileges -- with dire consequences for America and the world.
Most people may be inclined to dismiss the idea of "kickstarting World War III" as alarmism, if not conspiracy-mongering. Maybe that is the case.
On the other hand, such speculation isn't entirely baseless in light of the willingness of some American politicians -- including some who aspire to the Oval Office (and one who might actually get there) -- to impose a no-fly zone or "safe area" in Syria, and threaten to shoot down Russian aircraft to do it; give lethal aid to Ukrainian forces, along with putting American and other NATO advisers' and trainers' "boots on the ground"; or directly challenge Beijing's claim of sovereignty over rocks in the South China Sea through US and allied air and naval transit despite Chinese warnings of a military response.
If such a confrontation were to get out of control, either by design or accident, the resulting conflict could assume unexpectedly catastrophic proportions.
Instead of saving the Deep State, a world war (one that is presumed to go nuclear) could hasten its extinction, along with that of much else besides.
How American Media Serves as a Transmission Belt for Wars of Choice
Social Science Research Network (September 13, 2016)
With the end of the US-Soviet Cold War in 1991, a fundamental shift occurred in global behavior of the United States with respect to "wars of choice" unconnected to vital national security interests. Parallel with that shift, American media increasingly have operated uncritically in conjunction with the bipartisan Washington political establishment to "sell" such wars to the American public.
Among the key features of such cooperation discernable in successive conflicts are deficiency of geographic and historical knowledge as the American norm (the less people know, the more likely they are to believe what they are told, with the least informed most persuaded of the need to "do something");
reliance on government sources, "ventriloquism," and "information incest" (unknown to the public, much media "information" comes from government sources);
centralized corporate ownership (official policy imperatives interface with ratings dollars for six giant corporate conglomerates);
"para-journalism," "infotainment," and "atrocity porn" as a war trigger (atrocities appear seemingly on cue and then receive saturation coverage);
demonization "Hitler" memes and "weaponization" of media (compromise and negotiation have no role in confronting absolute evil: war is the default option);
America and the "international community," the "Free World," and American "exceptionalism" and "leadership";
disregarding "alternative" media, American samizdat (accurate information is available in "alternative" media, but the major still decide if it exists or not);
"we never make mistakes," "stay the course," and "MoveOn-ism" (US policy has no rearview mirror; authors of past blunders are not discredited, while those who said "tolya so" are ignored).
In turn, media themselves are an integral part of a multifaceted, hybrid public-private entity with broad range and depth.
Variously known as the Establishment, the Oligarchy, or the Deep State, this entity includes elements within all three branches of the US government (especially in the military, intelligence, and financial sectors), private business (the financial industry, government contractors, information technology), think tanks, NGOs, the "Demintern," both political parties and campaign operatives, and an army of lobbyists and PR professionals.
Looking into the future in light of 2016 anti-Establishment challenges from Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, the shortcomings of Barack Obama's policies in Libya, Syria, and Ukraine on top of those of George W. Bush in Iraq and Afghanistan, shrinkage of the American Middle Class, and increasing public skepticism of the "MSM" in favor of digital "alternative media," both the Washington-based oligarchy and its media component show signs of losing their grip.
The possibility exists for a peaceful evolution to a less warlike posture (impacting media as well) that would refocus on America's domestic needs. Alternatively, the existing order could risk a major war in a desperate bid to save its wealth, power, and privileges – with unforeseeable consequences for America and the world.
Copyright 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.