The Washington Post's Faked Fake News and the Return of the CIA's "Operation Mockingbird"
January 4, 2017 Daniel McAdams / AntiWar.com & Ron Paul Liberty Hours & Claire Bernish / The Free Thought Project
FBI agents conducting undercover investigations have now been given the green light to impersonate journalists, according to a Justice Department determination that effectively legalizes the government's most notorious propaganda program, "Operation Mockingbird," a covert Allen Dulles-era program employed from the 1960s-1990s to infiltrate and control the content of public news media.
Ron Paul on Facts or Fakes:
Can We Trust The Washington Post? Daniel McAdams / AntiWar.com
(January 3, 2017) -- In November, the Washington Post printed an article accusing some 200 independent media organizations of being "fake news" sites doing the bidding of the Kremlin. Their evidence? They had none, so very soon they were forced to walk back the story.
On Friday, they breathlessly reported that the Russians had hacked our energy grid, but it soon turned out they didn't bother to actually contact the company they reported hacked. It wasn't hacked. They had to walk back the story. Yes their credibility is shot, but they still churn out a steady stream of propaganda.
What to do about their disintegrating credibility? Convince the US government that they should be in charge of vetting what is is fake news versus real news. It can't happen here? Tune in to today's Ron Paul Liberty Report:
(September 22, 2016) -- FBI agents conducting undercover investigations have now been given the green light to impersonate journalists, the Justice Department determined last week -- effectively legalizing the government's most notorious propaganda program, Operation Mockingbird.
Allowing agents to infiltrate media organizations for any reason threatens to utterly undermine public trust, kill the very concept of journalistic integrity, and throttle the flow of information from sources and whistleblowers concerned with the legitimacy of journalists they contact.
As shocking as the finding sounds, it only validates the practice -- in fact, the report centers around a case from 2007 in which an FBI agent pretended to be an Associated Press journalist to identify an elusive suspect online.
At the time, the FBI "did not prohibit agents from impersonating journalists or from posing as a member of a news organization," the report states.
But even the ubiquitous, mainstream AP -- whose outlet became an unwitting pawn for the agency -- sharply criticized the DOJ's announcement.
"The Associated Press is deeply disappointed by the Inspector General's findings, which effectively condone the FBI's impersonation of an AP journalist in 2007," Associated Press Vice President Paul Colford said in a statement cited by US News. "Such action compromises the ability of a free press to gather the news safely and effectively and raises serious constitutional concerns."
In 2007, a high school student near Seattle emailed a series of bomb threats to his school, but his use of proxy servers thwarted police efforts to learn his identity -- so they asked for assistance from the FBI's Northwest Cybercrime Task Force.
Agents devised a plan, and, as the Intercept summarized, "An undercover agent sent the student email impersonating an editor for the Associated Press. The email included links to a fake news site designed to look like the Seattle Times."
When the student followed the links, malware revealing his actual location installed itself.
It wasn't until an ACLU technologist accidentally discovered copies of the bogus news stories in 2014 -- buried in pages the Electronic Frontier Foundation obtained from the FBI via a Freedom of Information Act request in 2011 -- that the plot to pose as journalists came to light, generating massive controversy and consternation.
Furthering the contempt, FBI Director James Comey penned a letter to the editor of the New York Times defending the agency's impersonation, dismissively stating "we do use deception at times to catch crooks, but we are acting responsibly and legally."
The Associated Press and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press didn't believe either the veracity or legality of Comey's statement, and sued the FBI to disclose documents relating to the practice -- ultimately obtaining a redacted memo in which the agency acknowledged the agents violated the FBI's own guidelines. However, the memo also stated that violation, under the circumstances, was not "unreasonable."
A review was launched by the OIG, but Thursday's conclusion simply confirmed the FBI's previous finding it had done nothing wrong -- and may proceed with future journalistic deception.
In June this year, the FBI firmed up its rules for when an agent can pretend to be a journalist -- but the added rules haven't quelled the ire.
As long as agents receive approval from the head of the FBI field office, the Undercover Review Committee, and the deputy director of the FBI -- who then must meet with the deputy attorney general -- they are free to pose as journalists during undercover investigations.
"We believe the new interim policy on undercover activities that involve FBI employees posing as members of the news media is a significant improvement to FBI policies that existed," states the inspector general.
But no one outside the FBI or DOJ's Office of Inspector General who grasps the grievous threat to free speech and press -- or the potential slippery slope law enforcement co-opting the media represents -- agrees anything short of an abolishment on the practice could be acceptable.
"The FBI guidelines adopted in 2016 in response to this incident still permit the FBI to impersonate news organizations and other third parties without their consent in certain cases, and fail to address the host of other dangers associated with FBI hacking," Neema Singh Guliani, ACLU legislative counsel, said in a statement cited by US News.
"The Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press is deeply troubled by today's disclosure," David Boardman, RCFP steering committee chairman, wrote in a statement last Thursday, "that the FBI believes that there is a place in this country for federal agents to impersonate journalists.
"Such a policy can seriously damage the public's trust in its free press and the ability of journalists to hold government accountable. We urge the Justice Department to take seriously the need for reform and the importance of protecting the integrity of the newsgathering process."
Anyone with cursory knowledge of the US government's nefarious programs to control its citizenry will undoubtedly see similarities between the FBI's fake journalism plot and the post-World War II CIA propaganda campaign, Operation Mockingbird.
To ensure support for its operations and views, the CIA clandestinely recruited American journalists and media outlets, funded the creation of student and cultural organizations, launched purely propaganda-based print media, and, ultimately, worked its way into political campaigns and employed similar methods abroad.
Mainstream outlets like the New York Times, the Washington Post, CBS, and many others, actively and willingly disseminated propaganda disguised as news -- through suppression, censorship, and selective focus, etc. -- in the interest of the government.
Mockingbird covertly influenced national opinion for years, nefariously planting the CIA's narrative on the unwitting collective public mind before finally being at least partially exposed over a decade later. It wasn't until a congressional investigation in 1975 the putative full extent of the program was revealed. Although the CIA claimed it would no longer recruit journalists and media organizations into its folds, Mockingbird has oft been rumored never to have stopped.
Besides the revelations in this article concerning the FBI, documents revealed the government actively tried to influence public thought about Wikileaks and its founder, Julian Assange, in 2011.
It would seem Mockingbird endures to this day -- and whatever premise the government claims as reason to become the American media -- the public remains, for the large part, its oblivious, captive audience.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.