February 17, 2012 AntiWar.com & The Associated Press
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and top US military and intelligence officials testified at congressional hearings on Iran and they ALL reiterated the consensus that Iran's nuclear program is purely CIVILIAN in nature. So why is the US punishing Iran with harsh economic sanctions and provoking Iran's naval forces by sending a naval armada into the Persian Gulf? Why does the President, the GOP and major network news outlets continue to refer to "Iran's nuclear weapons program"?
Panetta: Iran is Not Developing Nuclear Weapons John Glaser / AntiWar.com
(February 16, 2012) -- Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Thursday that Iran is enriching uranium in a peaceful nuclear program but that Tehran has not decided to develop an atomic bomb.
Top US military and intelligence officials gave separate testimonies in congressional hearings on Thursday regarding Iran, and while they all reiterated the consensus that Iran's nuclear program is purely civilian in nature, they also kept up the tough talk, hoping to satisfy hawks eager to preemptively strike Iran.
Panetta explained emphatically that any move from Iran to develop nuclear weapons is a "red line" for the US "We will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon," he said. "That is the red line that would concern us and that would ensure that the international community, hopefully together, would respond."
"But the intelligence does not show that they've made the decision to proceed with developing a nuclear weapon," Panetta added. This has been a bit of an inconvenient truth for Washington as they continue to heap crippling economic sanctions on Iran supposedly out of suspicion of their nuclear program. They've also continued to support Israel – and refuse to criticize it – even while Tel Aviv has supported terrorist operations against Iranian nuclear scientists.
Iran, on the defensive, has made announcements about new, domestically-made centrifuges were installed at the main uranium enrichment site at Natanz, branding that and other such developments as some nuclear "milestone." But US State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Wednesday the announcement was "hyped" for a domestic audience.
"Our view on this is that it's not terribly new and it's not terribly impressive," she said.
Panetta also reiterated the oft-repeated euphemism for potential military attack against Iran, "we do keep all options on the table." This helped lend legitimacy for political opportunists in the GOP to fear-monger about an imminent Iranian nuclear bomb, as House Speaker John Boehner did.
Panetta Says Iran Enriching Uranium but No Decision Yet on Proceeding with a Nuclear Weapon Associated Press
WASHINGTON (February 16, 2012) -- Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Thursday that US intelligence shows Iran is enriching uranium in a disputed nuclear program but that Tehran has not made a decision on whether to proceed with development of an atomic bomb.
Fears of a nuclear-armed Iran produced tough talk from Panetta and the nation's top intelligence officials, all of whom offered insights and observations on the secretive regime in separate congressional hearings. Their testimony came amid increasing international fears of a Mideast conflagration as Iran boasted of major advances in producing nuclear fuel and threatened an oil embargo in retaliation for economic and diplomatic sanctions.
Israel has accused Iran of being behind recent attacks on its diplomats in Thailand, Georgia and India and has threatened military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities.
"We will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. This isn't just about containment. We will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon," Panetta told the House Appropriations defense subcommittee. "We will not allow Iran to close the Straits of Hormuz. And in addition to that, obviously, we have expressed serious concerns to Iran about the spread of violence and the fact that they continue to support terrorism and they continue to try to undermine other countries."
The Pentagon chief delivered President Barack Obama's oft-repeated statement that "we do keep all options on the table."
Panetta, the former CIA director, said US intelligence shows that Iran is continuing its uranium enrichment program. "But the intelligence does not show that they've made the decision to proceed with developing a nuclear weapon. That is the red line that would concern us and that would ensure that the international community, hopefully together, would respond," he said.
Testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee, National Intelligence Director James Clapper said the decision on a nuclear weapon would be made by Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, raising questions about the role of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the process.
"He (Khamenei) would base that on a cost-benefit analysis in terms of, I don't think he'd want a nuclear weapon at any price," Clapper said. "So that I think plays to the value of sanctions, particularly the recent ratcheting up of more sanctions and anticipation that that will induce a change in their policy and behavior."
Clapper said it's "technically feasible" that Tehran could produce a nuclear weapon in one or two years if its leaders decide to build one, "but practically not likely."
The Obama administration recently imposed sanctions on Iran's Central Bank, the latest round of penalties that have widespread bipartisan support in Congress. The Treasury Department announced Thursday that it was slapping sanctions on Iran's ministry of intelligence and security, asserting that it supports global terrorism, commits human rights abuses against Iranians and participates in ongoing repression in Syria.
The first round of penalties on the Central Bank go into effect Feb. 29, and would prohibit any foreign financial institution from conducting business in the United States if Obama concludes that it has conducted or facilitated a significant financial transaction with the Central Bank or other sanctioned Iranian financial institutions.
Sen. Bob Menendez, D-NJ, a chief sponsor of the sanctions, met with David Cohen, the Treasury Department's undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, and said the administration was eager to press ahead despite reservations last year that the penalties could drive up oil prices and benefit Iran's economy.
"I have no sense that they're looking to get an extension," Menendez said in an interview. "The administration shares with us that this is our best hope of deterring Iranian action and their march to nuclear weapons."
Panetta and lawmakers insist the sanctions are taking an economic toll on Iran, reflected in their erratic response. But Israel is not speaking with one voice on the issue. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the sanctions haven't been effective yet, while his defense minister and vice premier said the penalties are strong and have the Iranians panicking.
Despite the tough talk from Netanyahu, Clapper and the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Lt. Gen. Ronald Burgess, said they do not believe Israel has decided to strike Iran.
But if Iran is attacked, Burgess said, it "can close the Straits of Hormuz, at least temporarily, and may launch missiles against United States forces and our allies in the region."
"Iran could also attempt to employ terrorists' surrogates worldwide. However, the agency assesses Iran is unlikely to initiate or intentionally provoke a conflict," he said.
Clapper said Iran has a "kind of shotgun marriage" with al-Qaida despite the fact that Iran is a Shia state and al-Qaida is Sunni Muslim.
"The Iranians may think that they might use perhaps al-Qaida in the future as a surrogate or proxy," he said.
Ratcheting up the pressure, a bipartisan group of senators unveiled a non-binding resolution that rules out containment of a nuclear weapons-capable Iran and backs US policy to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons capability. Republicans and Democrats said the purpose of the measure was to show support for the Obama administration as they likened the situation to a slow-moving version of the Cuban missile crisis.
"It is a statement to Iran, the international community and President Obama that if Iran refuses to negotiate an end to their nuclear program, and President Obama decides a military strike is necessary in the interests of our national security, he can count on strong bipartisan support in Congress for that decision," Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., said at a news conference.
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said the message on sanctions to the administration was, "Do it faster."
"We will end their nuclear weapons program," said Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del.
At a news conference, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said that for the sake of Israel and moderate Arab nations, "We need to take further action."
"We gave the president a lot of tools to use," he said, referring to the Iran Sanctions Act. "He's used some of them, but there are more tools available to the president to try to bring Iran into the world community."
Associated Press writers Kimberly Dozier, Larry Margasak, Matthew Lee and Alan Fram contributed to this report.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.