Environmentalists Against War
Home | Say NO! To War | Action! | Information | Media Center | Who We Are

 

 

Police Accused of Hyping Terror 'Threat' to Justify Police Violence


July 12, 2015
Charles P. Pierce / Esquire & Alison Knezevich, Ian Duncan and Luke Broadwater / The Baltimore Sun

Commentary: According to official statements, the FBI has arrested around a dozen people in the past four weeks "to thwart what we thought they were up to." Show me the evidence. Bring them to trial. I hate to be this cynical, but I've now lived through damned near 15 years of this stuff, so I'm not buying the rap wholesale any more. My government, and the people working in it, have found fear far too useful.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a36323/fourth-of-july-terror-plot-foiled/

Fourth of July Terror Plot and the Theater of the FBI
Why are they going out of their way to tell us that nothing happened?

Charles P. Pierce / Esquire

(July 9, 2015) -- I hate to be this cynical, but I've now lived through damned near 15 years of this stuff, so I'm not buying the rap wholesale any more. My government, and the people working in it, have found fear far too useful.

"I do believe our work disrupted efforts to kill people, likely in connection with July 4," Comey told reporters at FBI headquarters in Washington. Comey's comments are a public confirmation made by other law enforcement that several people were arrested in the past month over concerns that they might have been inspired by ISIS to carry out attacks either during the holiday or during the Muslim holy period of Ramadan.

Bollocks. Coming hard on the heels of the news that, during the unrest in Baltimore, law-enforcement engaged in a fairly thorough disinformation campaign, I'm going to need a lot more than than Comey's word on this. [See story below – EAW.]

The FBI has arrested around a dozen people in the past four weeks, Comey said. "We made the arrests to thwart what we thought they were up to," he added. "Some of them were focused on the Fourth of July, and that's as specific as I can get." He declined to say how many of those arrested were planning to carry out attacks or to describe the nature of what they were planning.

Show me the evidence. Bring them all to trial. Until then, what is the point in telling us anything at all? If the attacks were thwarted, we really don't have to know about them, do we? Unless, of course, your point in releasing this information is to keep the fear level high enough so that you can aggrandize your own power a little more.

Some of those arrested, he said, had been using end-to-end encryption programs to communicate with ISIS. He warned Congress on Wednesday that it's becoming much harder for the FBI to track potential ISIS followers because of the growth in encryption technology.

According to what we are allowed to know about it, the U.S. intelligence budget for 2014 was somewhere around $70 billion. If we're spending that money and still can get outsmarted by angry teenagers, and some guys driving pick-up trucks around Syria, somebody needs to get fired in a hurry.



Baltimore Police Rebuked for 'Uncorroborated'
Gang Threat Report on Day of Freddie Gray Funeral

Alison Knezevich, Ian Duncan and Luke Broadwater / The Baltimore Sun

(June 25, 2015) -- City leaders questioned Thursday why the Baltimore Police Department issued a public warning, on the morning of Freddie Gray's funeral, that gang members had teamed up to "take out" police officers.

Police announced on April 27 a "credible threat" that the Bloods, Crips and Black Guerrilla Family had joined together up to target officers, but other law enforcement agencies concluded within hours that they couldn't verify the claim, according to interviews and documents obtained by The Baltimore Sun.

"I knew all along it was a bunch of baloney," City Council President Bernard C. "Jack" Young said. "They owe the council and the public an explanation for why they put this false information out there."

The police warning was circulated in a news release at 11:27 a.m. on the day of Gray's funeral, two days after protests over his death turned violent.

Also that day, police were assessing rumors of teenagers planning an after-school "purge" — a reference to widespread violence as depicted in a movie of that name. Within hours, the city descended into a night of rioting and looting.

Gray, 25, died April 19 after suffering an injury to his neck and spine while riding handcuffed in a police van. Six police officers have been charged in connection with his arrest and death; all have pleaded not guilty.

State Sen. Bill Ferguson, a Baltimore Democrat, said the claim that officers were being targeted by gang members heightened the tension that morning.

"When that news was released, apprehension of the moment increased," Ferguson said.

Police defended their decision to spread word of the threat, arguing that it was "imminent and consistent with previous threats."
The department acknowledged that the threat was later determined to be "non-credible" but said other threats continued to be received as the unrest went on.

"This threat came less than 48 hours after officers were attacked by protestors and a short time before more attacks would take place," police spokesman Capt. Eric Kowalczyk said in a statement. "Due to the exigency of the circumstances, the credibility of the threat at the time it was received, extraordinary action was taken.

"The department acted out of an abundance of caution rather than see an officer injured or killed and would do so again."

City Councilman Brandon Scott wrote an email Thursday to police Commissioner Anthony W. Batts and other top leaders in the department, saying that if reports that the FBI discredited the claim were true, "it is extremely unacceptable and put the lives of citizens, officers and others in danger."

"Falsifying a threat of this magnitude during a highly tense time should result in the strongest penalty possible," Scott wrote. "If we are going to repair our city, this kind of behavior cannot be tolerated."

Shayne Buchwald, an FBI spokeswoman, said Thursday that agents interviewed their gang sources at the request of Baltimore police and were unable to corroborate the threat.

Neighboring Baltimore County police also told their officers that day that the threat was "uncorroborated," according to internal police emails obtained this week by The Sun under the Maryland Public Information Act.

In an email to all sworn officers sent at 4:12 p.m. April 27, a lieutenant wrote that the city "identifies very nonspecific information about a retaliatory threat towards Law Enforcement after today's funeral for Freddy Gray."

"Circumstances regarding the source of information and its veracity are still being evaluated," Lt. Matthew Gorman wrote. "Baltimore County Intel is communicating with our counterparts in Baltimore City and at this time the below/attached information is uncorroborated. As we work to confirm or dispel the alleged threat please use caution and forward any related information to the Intelligence Unit."

At the time, amid growing protests in the city over Gray's death, Batts had asked surrounding law enforcement agencies for help in policing the city.

Cpl. John Wachter, a spokesman for county police, said in an interview that the department was never able to corroborate the claim.

Vice News reported this week that documents released by the Department of Homeland Security showed that the FBI had interviewed the Baltimore police's source and found that the threat was not credible.

Federal investigators also moved quickly to assess the threat, according to the documents released to Vice News, a New York-based news outlet. An official at the Maryland Coordination and Analysis Center, a clearinghouse for police information, wrote at 1:38 p.m. that day that the meaning of "credible" in the Baltimore police response was not clear.

It more likely meant that gangs could plausibly attack an officer rather than that the police had specific information, the official wrote. In an email at 5:16 p.m., another official wrote that the FBI officer in Baltimore had interviewed the city Police Department's source and determined the "threat to be non-credible."

The day after the rioting, people who said they were members of gangs stood with members of the City Council to denounce the violence. At the meeting, Young dismissed the Baltimore police's claim as "false."

City Councilman Nick Mosby called the Police Department's warning about the threat "problematic at best."

"When you put out incendiary statements like that, and you don't have credible information, that's a problem," Mosby said. "The lack of communication, and communication that was not factual, are really the variables of a disaster."

Mosby said he believed the warning played on the public's fears and said "police need to come out and communicate why they thought it was a credible threat."

"Folks in my area, as soon as it came out, they didn't believe it one bit," he said. "It's unfortunate to find it wasn't credible."

Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.

back

 

 

Stay Connected
Sign up to receive our weekly updates. We promise not to sell, trade or give away your email address.
Email Address:
Full Name:
 

 

Search Environmentalists Against War website

 

Home | Say NO! To War | Action! | Information | Media Center | Who We Are