Bush’s Iraq Fallu-cination

September 24th, 2004 - by admin

Bill Berkowitz / WorkingForChange – 2004-09-24 22:50:23


“I call it the Madman Theory, Bob. I want the North Vietnamese to believe I’ve reached the point where I might do anything to stop the war. We’ll just slip the word to them that ‘for God’s sake, you know Nixon is obsessed about Communists. We can’t restrain him when he’s angry — and he has his hand on the nuclear button’ — and Ho Chi Minh himself will be in Paris in two days begging for peace.”
— Richard M. Nixon, as reported by aide H.R. Haldeman

(September 23, 2004) — On the campaign trail earlier this summer, President Bush was fond of saying “We are turning the corner, and we are not turning back.” According to the president, under his stewardship the US had turned the corner on the economy, education, health care and national security.

Along about mid-August, he “apparently turned a corner in his use of what had been a popular refrain in recent campaign stump speeches,” CNN reported, dropping the “turning the corner” catchphrase from his repertoire. Well, the president has turned another corner and this time he has smashed into a brick wall of criticism about his failed policy in Iraq.

If he follows the advice of the mow-’em-downers and the flush-’em-outers, President Bush will turn Fallujah — a cauldron of Iraqi resistance — into rubble; fill the city’s under-staffed and under-equipped hospitals with the pulpy remnants of men, women and children; and unleash US bombers that will create a rebuilding project that even Bechtel might have second thoughts about taking on.

A Storm of Bad News from Iraq
Last week, the bad news on Iraq came on like a hurricane:

• The New York Times revealed that a late-July report produced by the National Intelligence Council (NIC) forecast “a dark assortment of prospects for Iraq.” The highly-classified National Intelligence Estimate — the first report on Iraq put together by the NIC since October 2002 and approved by the National Foreign Intelligence Board under acting CIA Director John McLaughlin — concluded that there were three possible outcomes for Iraq in 2005: At best the country would be in a constant state of tenuous stability; at worst, there could be civil war.

• Former military officials, retired General William Odom, former head of the National Security Agency, and retired General Joseph Hoare, a former Marine commandant and head of US Central Command, chimed in with their criticisms of the president.

General Odom maintained that given “the course we’re on, we’re achieving Bin Laden’s ends.” General Hoare, pointing out that the administration appeared incapable of adjusting to the reality on the ground, said: “There are no good options. We’re conducting a campaign as though it were being conducted in Iowa, no sense of the realities on the ground.”

• Three high-profile Republican Senators, Indiana’s Dick Lugar and Nebraska’s Chuck Hagel criticized the president’s current Iraq strategy. Senator Lugar maintained that the president was being snowed by the “blindly optimistic people” he surrounded himself with, while Senator Hagel pointed out that the situation in Iraq was deteriorating, and acknowledged that “we are in deep trouble.”

• Even Republican Senator John McCain — who’s been playing Tonto to Bush’s Lone Ranger during a number of campaign stops — declared his unease with developments in Iraq. On Fox News Sunday McCain said that “serious mistakes [were made] after the initial successes by not having enough troops there on the ground, by allowing the looting, by not securing the borders.

There was a number of things that we did. Most of it can be traced back to not having sufficient numbers of troops there.” McCain also pointed out that the situation was “obviously somewhat deteriorating,” and added that “the key” is to “recognize those mistakes, correct those mistakes, and prevail.”

Back to the UN
On Tuesday, September 21, President Bush — who two years ago warned that “unless the United Nations shows some backbone and courage, it could render the Security Council irrelevant” — made his way back to New York City and again addressed the UN General Assembly, trying to rally the world to join the quagmire. AFP reported that President Bush “demanded more UN action to help end the deadly chaos that has followed the US-led invasion.”

For the umpty-umpth time the president defended his decision to go into Iraq. With memories of Colin Powell’s now discredited and utterly fictitious February 2003 speech “justifying” a possible invasion of Iraq — complete with twisted facts and ridiculous exhibits of Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons — fresh in their minds, representatives received the president politely but coolly.

Two years after telling the UN that Saddam Hussein posed ”grave and gathering danger” President Bush “told a subdued UN General Assembly session that the US-led overthrow of Saddam Hussein delivered the Iraqi people from ‘’an outlawed dictator,’” the Associated Press reported.

“The UN and its member nations must respond to Prime Minister Allawi’s request and do more to help build an Iraq that is secure, democratic, federal and free,” said Bush, whose speech drew applause only when it ended, AFP reported.

Noticeable by its absence were any comments about the absence of Iraq’s stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction or the lack of evidence tying Hussein’s to al Qaeda, the two major justifications the Bush Administration advanced for invading Iraq.

‘A Great Visual for Domestic Purposes’
While Bush’s UN appearance will not win significant support from member states, it might yield a few political points at home: “It’s a great visual for domestic purposes,” Kenneth Adelman, a Reagan administration arms-control official who is close to many top Bush aides, told the Washington Post. “It undercuts Kerry’s argument against Bush that he doesn’t get along with other countries. They won’t be booing him. They’ll be politely applauding because they’re well-mannered folks.”

The ‘Madman Theory’ and the Destruction of Fallujah
Although McCain was critical of Bush, he clearly wasn’t advocating disengagement, calling instead for a ramped-up military presence. And now that the president’s less-than-robust appearance before the UN is over, he appears to be ready to go it alone again.

News reports have the Pentagon readying its forces for an all-out assault on Fallujah and perhaps other cities. According to Reuters, “The Pentagon has begun tapping its $25 billion emergency fund for the Iraq war to prepare for a major troop rotation and intense fighting this fall, administration officials said on Tuesday, [September 21] despite the White House’s initial insistence that it had enough money.”

However, if journalist Bob Novak is correct, Team Bush is preparing to leave Iraq if the president wins in November. According to Novak, “Well-placed sources in the administration are confident Bush’s decision will be to get out. They believe that is the recommendation of his national security team and would be the recommendation of second-term officials.

An informed guess might have Condoleezza Rice as secretary of state, Paul Wolfowitz as defense secretary and Stephen Hadley as national security adviser. According to my sources, all would opt for a withdrawal.”

But November’s results may not come soon enough for Bush. There’s still the matter of Fallujah to deal with. Having strutted and pranced about the world stage for the past three years, President Bush has reached another corner that needs turning. In his desire to extricate himself from the chaos of Iraq he may be reaching back into history and grasping for Richard Nixon’s playbook which included what Nixon referred to as his “Madman Theory.” If Bush takes the “Madman Theory” to heart, around every corner in Fallujah will lay more bodies in the rubble.

Regardless of how he proceeds, the president cannot turn back the clock to those heady days in late-March and early April 2003 when triumphalism was in the air and the administration’s neoconservatives comfortably appeared in public. US casualty figures were low; the damage was minimal; looters, not suicide bombers, were making their way around Baghdad with impunity; embedded reporters were regaling Americans were stories of heroism and conquest; US businesses were poised to move in and reap the rewards of victory; and the President of the United States was strutting about the world stage thumbing his nose at the rest of the world.

Bush’s oft-trumpeted qualities of being decisive, steadfast and unwavering may have played well in those days, but are now his Achilles heel: Evidence continues to mount that he’s trapped by spinmeisters in a time capsule spinning out of control, unwilling to listen to, process, or accept the steady stream of bad news coming from Iraq.

For more please see the Bill Berkowitz archive