Prisonplanet.com — John Leonard – 2005-07-08 12:14:58
Explosions in London — Who Stands To Gain?
(July 7, 2005) — BREAKING: Scrambled cover-up to try and change prior knowledge story. Original reports stated that Binyamin Netanyahu was warned BEFORE the first blast. Now all the Associated Press reports are being changed to say he was warned AFTER the first blast, for example this article.
The article linked below that we saved in our own format (and the website that carried it has strangely since crashed) said that Netanyahu was warned before the first blast.
Israel [is] now denying they got a warning.
BREAKING: Scotland Yard says it got a warning before the attack and told Israel.
“The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address and economic summit.”
The warning contradicts the fact that the original explanation of a power surge went out for an hour or more. They knew it was an attack but put out a false explanation. Plus why did Netanyahu get a warning and the victims didn’t?
We have been told that the events unfolding today were “inevitable”, London’s transport network has been hit with multiple explosions. Both the Underground and Buses have been hit. Events are still unfolding.
We predicted this would happen over a year ago after analyzing the propaganda and fearmongering that was being ratcheted up to the extreme in London. Paul Joseph Watson has predicted these events as imminent several times on The Alex Jones Show in recent months.
Tony Blair is not in London but safely tucked up in Scotland with 7 other World Leaders including President Bush. The political eyes of the world are on Britain this week. The Mayor of London Ken Livingstone is in Singapore where the IOC has just awarded the Olympic Games to London, he is rushing back to the city.
Just like the events of 9/11, ask yourself, who stands to gain from this? Could this have been organized by any group other than one who has direct unlimited access to all areas of London’s transport grid at all times?
The similarities with the Madrid bombing of 3/11/04, which we have persistently highlighted as an inside intelligence operation, are stark with bombs on separate trains set off within minutes of each other as the trains neared the stations. The so called perpetrators were quickly linked to an “Al Qaeda” cell in Europe but later as we reported were linked to the Spanish Security service. They then mysteriously Killed themselves as this information was seeping out.
It then became apparent that Spain’s government was using the bombings for its own gains and many went to the streets in Spain to declare they knew that their own government was behind the attacks. Further Intelligence was withheld by the government, we expect the same will happen in Britain after today’s attacks.
This has MI5 written all over it. Just watch that national ID card legislation sail through. Only 15% of the country supported the government after the last election, this will ensure total fealty to a smarmy Blair and whatever he wants to do. Ken Livingstone and the opposition parties will now have no grounds to reject ID card legislation, especially with the Olympics coming to London in 2012.
The police state measures they’ll get out of this will be overlaid onto all forms of transport. In fact, you won’t be able to travel without the ID card. Although MI5 operations are normally more sophisticated than things like 9/11, in that the evidence linking it to the government is more carefully covered, just watch for the evidence of inside involvement to trickle out. MI5 have been caught involved in IRA bombings multiple times over.
Alex has said over and over that as attacks on different sections of the transportation grid occur they are going to have police state setup in the areas. Now it will be on the buses, subways etc.
FLASHBACK: Schumer Wants Airport Screening Technology in Malls
The military-industrial complex has the motive in this latest atrocity. Every major western government, including the British, has been caught red-handed carrying out bombings against their own people and blaming it on external enemies. It is mainstream news in Spain that the government was involved in the 3/11 bombing.
The London 7/7 bombings are nothing different. Government ghouls are now all over television spreading the fear to encourage the people to submit to the war on terror. Support our work, spread the word, expose who is gaining power from terrorism, or our freedoms will be lost.
Hours after the attacks, the media is still not providing extensive coverage. We would expect to see hundreds of eyewitness accounts and footage of the train stations. Independent London reporter Simon Aronowitz, who has a contact within the BBC, has reported that journalists are finding the coverage of the situation highly irregular. It seems that the information being released to the British public is being carefully stage managed.
False Flag over London
Today we saw a classic false-flag attack in the London underground, organized by western secret services to distract attention from the deepening political troubles of Bush and Blair, and perhaps even to create the pretext for war on Iran. Of course, Bush and his poll ratings have been sinking under the Valerie Plame scandal, with rumblings of impeachment. Both Bush and Blair have been badly hurt by the Downing Street memo.
The G-8 conference was also an ideal, high-profile event to mobilize the sympathy of world leaders on their side. The home-team terrorists even got their favorite base-eleven numerology working for them with the 7/7 date, following on Madrid 3/11 and New York 9/11 (remember Flight 11 and Flight 77?)
Cui bono. Even the stock market closed on an uptick.
How can I be so sure? The war-profiteer clique are not all that inventive. In fact, false terror is the only trick they know. If they had any idea of governance or statecraft, they wouldn’t need to stoop to these toxic tactics.
One of the classic trademarks of false-flag terror was on display today with the “previously unknown” organization posting anonymously on a website. Of course, western intelligence, using Echelon and other tools, could track any webposting back to its source. If it wanted to.
Real Terrorists v. Fake Terrorists
“Real” terrorists have known organizations and make concrete demands.
Fake terrorists (covert psy-war units of western intelligence) always use the name of an “unknown” group.
They have to do this, of course. If they had claimed that, say, the PLO did it, the PLO would energetically deny it. So they use fictitious identities, which can be molded to suit the target of convenience.
Today, the fiction was a “secret” group affiliated oh how wonderfully convenient with Al Qaeda and Al Zarqawi. Yet the BBC itself has established that Al Qaeda does not even exist, in its documentary “The Terror Myth.” And just yesterday Dahr Jamail < www.dahrjamailiraq.com> wrote of his trip to the town of Zarqa, on the trail of the fabled Zarqawi. The man’s family believe he died years ago — no recent photos exist. Certain is only that the mythical Zarqawi always has his base of operations wherever the Americans want to attack. Fallujah, Mosul, wherever.
Some other dead giveaway signs:
• Scotland Yard warned Mr. Netanyahu not to go to the bomb site half an hour beforehand, according to an AP wire from Jerusalem (a slip that was subsequently denied of course, but it was still up at http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/ earlier today).
• An MSNBC translator says an error in a quotation from the Quran in a statement by the “unknown” group couldn’t have been made by Al Qaeda, and he thinks it’s phony. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8496293/. Blair’s proofreaders are falling down on their dossiers again…
• Train bombings like London 7/7 are a speciality of NATO psy-war units. The expert on this ever since 1978 has been Webster Tarpley, who shows in his latest book, 9/11 Synthetic Terror, how the bombing of Bologna Stazione Centrale in 1980 by the so-called Red Brigades is of one cloth with the Madrid bombings.
The supposed “communist terrorist” Red Brigades were fakes, a patsy outfit created by Lodge P2, the neofascist shadow government running Italy. Likewise, the suspects in the Madrid train bombing were police agents, run by a neo-fascist falange: as Tarpley notes, one suspect admitted he was working for the old guard of the Guardia Civil Unidad Central Operativa.
Another possible motive, says Tarpley, is the war party want to push Bush into Iran, but America has no stomach for it. They need another 9/11 now so they can occupy both the Iraqi and Iranian oil fields, and hold the world, all of us, to ransom.
The ground has been prepared for war on Iran by incursions into that country by under-cover American military units. This aggression aroused a storm of anti-American sentiment, which won the elections for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a radical dark horse candidate, in turn making it easier to mobilize a war coalition against Iran. Failing that, he may at least keep Iran in the grip of backward fundamentalism.
Tarpley has an entire chapter entitled “Islamic Fundamentalism: Fostered by US Foreign Policy.” It’s a policy going back to the 19th century British Arab Bureau, the divide and conquer specialists, who hit on xenophobic fundamentalism as the tool to make the Arabs impossible partners for alliances with any of Britain’s rivals.
“Poster boy” bin Laden is only the latest product of this policy. Alternative writers in the West are quick to point out the demagogic effect his image has on Western publics. They may not so easily realize the deeply cynical obverse of the covert strategy: feeding the Arabs on the poison pills of false hopes in a terrorist hero. Yet Arab admiration for Osama has remained platonic. Anthropologists long ago noted the Arab tendency for venting feelings in words rather than acting them out.
The BBC Terror Myth documentary points out that while the Arabs were eager to go to Afghanistan to fight the Soviet army, Bin Laden and Zawahiri utterly failed in attempts to mobilize Arabs to take the way of terrorism against innocent citizens.
According to Tarpley’s evidence, Zawahiri is probably bin Laden’s handler from MI-6. We enter thus the shadowy world of the alphabet agencies and their covert clients, the patsies and moles, who live a tunnel life, like the trains of London they have fed on this time.
O lovers of peace and opponents of war: you can see no end of calamities instigated by the war party, until the people see through the false flag trick.
In this vein, we are working on a new book that gives depth of historical background about this, entitled The Nazi Hydra in America, currently online. It shows how the 1933 Reichstag fire, perhaps the most famous false-flag op of the century, which catapulted the Bush-Harriman protégé Hitler to power, was followed in 1934 by an attempted military putsch by the Morgan interests against FDR, an episode that has been expunged from all schoolbooks.
Yet if it had succeeded, with America and Germany both under fascist control, the New World Fascist Order would have come into being 70 years ago.
Read, understand, and realize how bitter and lasting is the struggle against the corporatist hydra, which now lets show the true features behind that leering smiley face, as it reaches once more for absolute world power.
John Leonard is the publisher of Webster Tarpley’s 9/11 Synthetic Terror. Iwww.progressivepress.com. Tarpley is also the author of the groundbreaking classic George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography, http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0930852923