Jennifer Loven / Associated Press – 2005-09-02 09:48:29
Bush Gives New Reason for Iraq War
Jennifer Loven / Associated Press
CORONADO, California (August 31, 2005) — President Bush answered growing antiwar protests yesterday with a fresh reason for US troops to continue fighting in Iraq: protection of the country’s vast oil fields, which he said would otherwise fall under the control of terrorist extremists.
The president, standing against a backdrop of the USS Ronald Reagan, the newest aircraft carrier in the Navy’s fleet, said terrorists would be denied their goal of making Iraq a base from which to recruit followers, train them, and finance attacks.
“We will defeat the terrorists,” Bush said. “We will build a free Iraq that will fight terrorists instead of giving them aid and sanctuary.”
Appearing at Naval Air Station North Island to commemorate the anniversary of the Allies’ World War II victory over Japan, Bush compared his resolve to President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s in the 1940s and said America’s mission in Iraq is to turn it into a democratic ally just as the United States did with Japan after its 1945 surrender. Bush’s V-J Day ceremony did not fall on the actual anniversary. Japan announced its surrender on Aug. 15, 1945 – Aug. 14 in the United States because of the time difference.
Democrats said Bush’s leadership falls far short of Roosevelt’s.
“Democratic Presidents Roosevelt and Truman led America to victory in World War II because they laid out a clear plan for success to the American people, America’s allies, and America’s troops,” said Howard Dean, Democratic Party chairman.
“President Bush has failed to put together a plan, so despite the bravery and sacrifice of our troops, we are not making the progress that we should be in Iraq. The troops, our allies, and the American people deserve better leadership from our commander in chief.”
The speech was Bush’s third in just over a week defending his Iraq policies, as the White House scrambles to counter growing public concern about the war. But the devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina in the Gulf Coast drew attention away; the White House announced during the president’s remarks that he was cutting his August vacation short to return to Washington, DC, to oversee the federal response effort.
After the speech, Bush hurried back to Texas ahead of schedule to prepare to fly back to the nation’s capital today. He was to return to the White House on Friday, after spending more than four weeks operating from his ranch in Crawford.
Bush’s August break has been marked by problems in Iraq.
It has been an especially deadly month there for US troops, with the number of those who have died since the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 now nearing 1,900.
The growing death toll has become a regular feature of the slightly larger protests that Bush now encounters everywhere he goes – a movement boosted by a vigil set up in a field down the road from the president’s ranch by a mother grieving the loss of her soldier son in Iraq.
Cindy Sheehan arrived in Crawford only days after Bush did, asking for a meeting so he could explain why her son and others are dying in Iraq. The White House refused, and Sheehan’s camp turned into a hub of activity for hundreds of activists around the country demanding that troops be brought home.
This week, the administration also had to defend the proposed constitution produced in Iraq at US urging. Critics fear the impact of its rejection by many Sunnis, and say it fails to protect religious freedom and women’s rights.
At the naval base, Bush declared, “We will not rest until victory is America’s and our freedom is secure” from Al Qaeda and its forces in Iraq led by Abu Musab al Zarqawi.
“If Zarqawi and [Osama] bin Laden gain control of Iraq, they would create a new training ground for future terrorist attacks,” Bush said. “They’d seize oil fields to fund their ambitions. They could recruit more terrorists by claiming a historic victory over the United States and our coalition.”
Posted in accordance with Title 17, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.
An Open Letter to James Sterngold,
Reporter, San Francisco Chronicle
E. Mainland / Whited Sepulchre Foundation
Your story today (August 31, p. A3, “Bush likens situation in Iraq to WWII”) omitted several obvious differences between the Second World War and what is going on in Iraq.
Japan attacked us then Germany declared war against us; Congress then declared war. But Bush attacked Iraq without provocation or immediate threat, indeed, it now appears, without any valid reason at all; and Congress made no declaration of war.
The US response to the Japanese-initiated Axis attack was consistent with the rules of war then in force. Bush’s preventive attack on Iraq, by contrast, contravened the UN Charter and US legal treaty commitments thereto, leading UN Secretary General Anan to call Bush’s action “illegal” as did the United Kingdom’s attorney general (see
Downing Street memos).
Indeed, what the US has done appears, from a purely legal standpoint, more akin to Hitler’s unprovoked aggression against the nations of Europe than to the Allied response to Hitler’s attacks and subversion. Indeed, juridically and geopolitically, Bush’s attack on Iraq arguably was less justified than Saddam’s unilateral occupation of Kuwait.
The Allied cause in WWII was clearly justified by the Christian doctrine of “just war”. What Bush has done is not, leading the Catholic Church and all but one of America’s Christian denominations to oppose his Iraq venture.
US forces in WWII were mainly draftees united under a banner of anti-fascism and freedom led by an eloquent, persuasive president. They believed the cause was just.
US forces in Iraq are a motley
combination of professional military, hapless National Guard volunteers, and contract mercenaries, all of whom, like today’s scripted, inarticulate, devious president, can’t seem to settle on a
consistent explanation of his “just cause.”
All the bogus pretexts for making war that Bush advanced turned out to be hollow, and now he’s loath to meet with one grieving mom whose son has been lost in what she and many others see as an unjustified,
unnecessary conflict. And media are barred from filming the coffins as they come home.
The array of Allies in WWII against the powerful Axis can’t be compared with Bush’s satellite coalition of the bought and paid for, now rapidly dissolving, which raced through Saddam’s weak, run-down, Fourth-World military like the New England Patriots through the Little Sisters of the Poor or a Pop Warner pickup team.
In WWII, Allied forces and most peoples of the world looked to America as their great hope; today, much of the world (in latest opinion polls) has come to despise us and our bungled operation in Iraq, which
seriously impedes progress toward containing today’s real enemy, a relatively small number of Islamic extremists.
WWII came to a definite conclusion; Iraq is turning out to be an endless finishing school for terrorists, whose graduates are now appearing in Afghanistan, Egypt and elsewhere, ready to do us more harm.
Surely you could have found at least a few Americans who would be willing to say so?
E. Mainland is the General Secretary of the Whited Sepulchre Foundation in Marin, California. The Foundation is dedicated to revealing and disseminating noteworthy examples of cant, hypocrisy and mendacity among today’s scribes and Pharisees in modern American media, political life and civic culture. Our motto: “Woe unto ye O hypocrites” (Book of Matthew 25). Our symbol: scripture’s whitened vessel, seemingly pure on the outside but foul and rotten within.]