US Occupation of Iraq’s ‘Unintended Consequences’: US War Spending to Increase 44%

March 23rd, 2006 - by admin

Warren P. Strobel and Hannah Allam / Knight Ridder & Jeff Bliss / Bloomberg – 2006-03-23 08:23:06

Unintended Consequences: War Has Emboldened Extremists
Warren P. Strobel and Hannah Allam / Knight Ridder

WASHINGTON (March 19, 2006) — Three years after the United States invaded Iraq in pursuit of a freer, more stable Middle East, the country’s deepening ethnic conflict is spreading tension across Iraq’s borders, fueling terrorism and nurturing gloom about the future.

President Bush cited Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction and ties to international terrorism — neither of which turned out to exist — when he ordered a pre-emptive war that began March 20, 2003. He predicted payoffs for the wider Middle East: spreading democracy, deterred enemies, more secure oil flow, a less hostile environment for Israel.

None of that has happened, at least not yet.

Instead, said officials and analysts in the United States, Arab countries, Israel and Europe, the invasion has produced a vortex of unintended consequences.

Militancy is on the rise. Terrorists are using Iraq as a training base and potential launch pad for attacks elsewhere, according to US officials and documents. Democratic reform remains largely stymied.

The US Army and Marine Corps, and especially the reserves and National Guard, are feeling the strain of repeated deployments. Public support for the war is declining in America and almost non-existent elsewhere. The war has cost more than 2,300 American lives, and the Congressional Budget Office estimates that its total financial cost may exceed $500 billion.

“The region is pushed further toward extremism,” said Mohamed el-Sayed Said, the deputy director of the Cairo-based Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies. “The Bush administration was warned that it’s moving into an area of shifting sand. . . . This is a very complex region with legacies of sectarian violence and religious strife.”

In Jordan to the west, Saudi Arabia to the south and Turkey to the north — even in Israel — US allies are voicing growing concern that Iraq’s chaos could seep across their borders and infect them.

The president has said the Middle East was anything but stable before the invasion. Success in Iraq will leave the region better off and America safer, Bush said Monday in the first of three speeches to mark the anniversary.

“By helping Iraqis build a democracy, we will inspire reformers across the Middle East. And by helping Iraqis build a democracy, we’ll bring hope to a troubled region, and this will make America more secure in the long term,” he said.

Yet, so far at least, the reality in the Middle East is much different.

Regional Stability
Shortly after last month’s bombing of a sacred Shiite Muslim mosque in Samarra, Iraq, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met with Persian Gulf leaders in the United Arab Emirates. Afterward, she said they had told her they were worried that those who are provoking sectarian tension in Iraq might try to “stoke sectarian tensions in other parts of the region.”

Last September, the Saudi foreign minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal, warned that civil war in Iraq could drag in Iran, Turkey, the Kurds and Arabs.

Iraq’s Arab neighbors, dominated by Sunni Muslims, have watched in horror as Shiites gain political ascendancy in Iraq. So far they have supported Iraq’s unity, fearing that the country’s breakup could set off a regionwide scramble.

But a report last month by the private International Crisis Group warned that that could change if religious and ethnic tensions or Shiite power continues to grow.

“Increased sectarian polarization in Iraq will be viewed menacingly by neighboring states, and could draw them into Iraq and hasten its breakup, a development in which, ironically, they have no interest,” the report said.

Judith Yaphe, a Persian Gulf specialist at the National Defense University, said Iraq’s neighbors increasingly feared that terrorism, drugs, crime and the weakening of central power in Iraq would spill across the country’s borders.

Counterterrorism experts and US government documents seen by Knight Ridder say there are signs that terrorist-recruitment networks created to funnel foreign insurgents into Iraq are being “reversed,” with battle-trained militants flowing out of the country to try to destabilize other nations.

In November, suicide bombers apparently under orders from Iraq-based terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi killed at least 60 people in coordinated attacks on luxury hotels in Jordan’s capital, Amman.

Last month, would-be bombers were stopped during an attack on the world’s largest oil-processing plant, in Saudi Arabia.

How much regional terrorism is due to the invasion itself is open to debate. Some experts say Iraq is beginning to resemble Afghanistan in the 1980s — a place for jihadists to rally and confront a superpower.

Afghanistan “was the ultimate extremist-networking opportunity. I think Iraq is serving that same purpose,” said Paul Pillar, who retired last year as the US intelligence community’s top analyst on the Middle East and South Asia.

Few of Iraq’s neighbors see a model in its bloodshed and chaos.

“Who could possibly look at anything in Iraq and think, `I want some of that’?” said Yusuf Kanli, the editor of the Turkish Daily News.

The Bush administration has pushed Middle East dictators to open up, leading to small signs of political liberalization. Yet, authoritarian regimes continue to hoard power, brutally quashing opponents and claiming that the only alternatives are an Islamist takeover or the kind of chaos seen in Iraq.

In the Palestinian territories, Lebanon and Egypt, voters have turned out in large numbers to support the militant group Hamas, Hezbollah guerrillas and the Islamists of the Muslim Brotherhood, respectively.

“War has increased the wave of Islamism,” said Essam el-Erian of the influential Muslim Brotherhood, which is now Egypt’s leading opposition force.

In the wake of Hamas’ victory, the United States is widely perceived to have muted its pro-democracy rhetoric, leading to a sense that American support for democracy is fickle.

The United States’ moral authority to condemn human rights abuses has been damaged by reports of abuse in American-run detention centers in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
“If they were serious about democracy, they wouldn’t detain people in Guantánamo for life without trial,” said Haitham Maleh, a Damascus lawyer who is one of the most outspoken opponents of the Syrian regime. “The US is aggressive, hostile and has nothing to do with human rights.”

In Israel, which has learned some painful lessons after nearly 40 years as an occupying power, leaders have watched the deteriorating situation in Iraq with a mix of remorse and dread.

Although Israel tacitly backed the effort to oust Saddam and some of its American allies urged the United States to attack, there’s now broad, if quiet, criticism of the way the United States has handled the postwar period.

Gerald Steinberg, senior research associate at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, said the region probably is better off without Saddam, but he accused the United States of basing its policy more on faith than reality.

“The assumption that just being there and talking about democracy and elections would work was naive,” he said.

Dore Gold, Israel’s former ambassador to the United Nations, said the war had fueled the spread of Al-Qaida in the Middle East.

The prospect of Al-Qaida migrating west out of Iraq into Jordan and the Palestinian territories has given hawkish Israelis an opening to argue that Israel must hold on to Palestinian land in the West Bank as a buffer.

Iran has tried to use the war to extend its influence.

“Iran so far clearly is benefiting from events in Iraq, where friendly parties have come to power, and the US finds itself embroiled,” the International Crisis Group report said.

Iran appears to be banking that the United States is too tied up in Iraq to confront it militarily over its nuclear program. Still, others are worried.

“There is this overwhelming gloom about a possible strike against Iran,” said Prince Hassan of Jordan. “The confrontational mode is the only show in town.”

Iraq has the world’s second-largest known oil reserves. Securing energy supplies was an implicit goal of the invasion, and top US officials predicted that Iraq could pay for its own reconstruction.

Instead, because of insurgent attacks and the dislocations of war, Iraq’s 2005 oil production was below prewar levels, according to Energy Department figures. Crude-oil prices are near record highs and markets are tight.

Iraq’s instability is a “fiasco” that has transformed the country “from being an important exporter of crude oil and refined products to being an importer of refined products,” said Labib Kamhawi, the president of the Jordanian petrochemical, oil and gas consulting firm Cessco.

Warren P. Strobel reported from Washington, Hannah Allam reported from Cairo, Egypt; Knight Ridder correspondents Dion Nissenbaum in Israel, Matthew Schofield in Turkey and Miret el-Naggar in Cairo contributed to this report.

Posted in accordance with Title 17, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.

US War Spending to Rise
44% to $9.8 Billion a Month, Report Says

Jeff Bliss /

(March 17, 2006) — US military spending in Iraq and Afghanistan will average 44 percent more in the current fiscal year than in fiscal 2005, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service said.

Spending will rise to $9.8 billion a month from the $6.8 billion a month the Pentagon said it spent last year, the research service said. The group’s March 10 report cites “substantial” expenses to replace or repair damaged weapons, aircraft, vehicles, radios and spare parts.

It also figures in costs for health care, fuel, national intelligence and the training of Iraqi and Afghan security forces — “now a substantial expense,” it said.

The research service said it considers “all war and occupation costs,” while the Pentagon counts just the cost of personnel, maintenance and operations.

The House approved emergency funding that includes the military spending last night by a vote of 348-71. The measure authorizes $72 billion for war costs and almost $20 billion for hurricane relief. The Senate is expected to pass it next month.

Congress already has approved $50 billion in supplemental war funding for the current fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30, after spending $100 billion last year. To date, Congress has approved about $337 billion for the wars since Sept. 11, 2001.

2007 Funding
The administration has said it also will seek $50 billion in war funding for fiscal 2007 to serve as a bridge fund until needs are assessed. That will be on top of the $439.3 billion defense budget the president submitted.

The request the House approved last night includes $67.6 billion for war operations, much of it in costs for personnel and repair and replacement of equipment; about $4.9 billion to train and equip Afghan and Iraqi security forces; and about $2 billion for defenses against roadside bombs, which have been a leading cause of death for US servicemen in Iraq.

To date, 2,310 members of the US military have died in Iraq since the war began three years ago, 1,808 of them in combat, according to the Pentagon.

The hurricane money approved last night will go toward housing, enhancing levees and public safety projects in Louisiana and Mississippi following the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina last August, the administration has said.

Spending on the wars and hurricane relief will help widen the federal budget deficit to a record $423 billion this fiscal 2006, an increase from last year’s $319 billion deficit, the administration forecast last month.

$87 Billion Already
Of the $87 billion already approved for hurricane relief and rebuilding, $31 billion has been earmarked for health and social services, school repairs, payments to farmers and unemployment insurance; $41 billion is going for temporary housing and flood insurance payments and $15 billion is set aside for levee and road repairs and repairs to damaged federal facilities, according to the administration.

The measure passed last night includes an amendment to prohibit a Dubai-owned company from operating port facilities in the US DP World, the third-largest container port operator, has already promised it will sell its US operations to a US buyer. Most lawmakers conceded the issue was moot but wanted their opposition to the original deal to be on record.

Other amendments provide extra money for anti-drug operations in Colombia and peacekeeping efforts in the Darfur region of Sudan.

Posted in accordance with Title 17, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.