Paul Joseph Watson / Prison Planet – 2006-09-16 01:05:13
(September 7 2006) — A 28-year CIA career man and a former skeptic of alternative 9/11 explanations has gone further than ever before in voicing his convictions that the attacks bore the hallmarks of an inside job and the three buildings in the WTC complex were brought down by controlled demolition.
Bill Christison is a former senior official of the CIA. He was a National Intelligence Officer and the Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis before his retirement in 1979. Since then he has written numerous articles on US foreign policies.
In Christison’s recent article, “Stop Belittling the Theories About September 11,” he afforded credibility to the notion that “significant parts” of the official 9/11 story were false and after careful research he concluded that the twin towers and building 7, “were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings.”
Christison went further on The Alex Jones Show, agreeing that the attacks being an inside job was the “most likely possibility.”
“David Griffin believes this all was totally an inside job — I’ve got to say I think that it was too,” said Christison.
Christison initially approached the subject unwilling to even consider that elements of the government could be engaged in such heights of criminality but his research quickly began to change his mind.
“Just about half a year ago it dawned on me that not only was I trying to avoid an issue that might be extraordinarily important — more important than any other issue,” said Christison.
“I have since decided that…. at least some elements in this US government had contributed in some way or other to causing 9/11 to happen or at least allowing it to happen.”
Building Collapses: An Unlikely Trifecta
Christison stated that the suspicious collapse of the three buildings — including building 7 which wasn’t hit by a plane — were likely the result of controlled demolitions.
“The reason that the two towers in New York actually collapsed and fell all the way to the ground was controlled explosions rather than just being hit by two airplanes.”
“All of the characteristics of these demolitions show that they almost had to have been controlled explosions.”
The Pentagon’s Missing $2.3 Trillion
Referencing the $2.3 trillion that was discovered to be missing from the Pentagon’s coffers, Christison emphasized the fact that with an unlimited budget, the scope of operations that could be undertaken by the military-industrial complex are almost without recourse.
“There is so much money now sloshing around throughout not only the CIA but the intelligence components of the Defense Department – which are actually bigger than the CIA – that these guys can do almost anything they want these days.”
Christison said that one of the subsidiary motives behind 9/11 was to take attention away from an impending exposure of the missing trillions and criminal proceedings against high officials – just as LBJ had Kennedy assassinated partly to delay imminent corruption probes that would have sent him to prison.
Christison is just the latest in a deluge of former government and intelligence agency insiders to boldly go public with their doubts about the official story behind 9/11 and he has an urgent message for future whistleblowers who might be considering the same course of action.
“We have got to be willing to be discredited, we have got to stick our necks out — this is just plain too important.”
Posted in accordance with Title 17, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.
Syria Says US Behind Attack On Own Embassy
Ryan R. Jones, Middle East Correspondent / All Headline News
JERUSALEM, Israel (September 13, 2006) — Senior Syrian government official have accused the US of being behind Tuesday’s assault on its own embassy in downtown Damascus.
A Baath party official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told WorldNetDaily, “We in the government are 100 percent sure America was behind this attack, which is not the same as other attacks by Islamic groups.”
He explained, “Only the Americans can succeed in carrying out an attack just 200 meters from President Bashar Assad’s residence in the most heavily guarded section of Syria.”
The official charged that Washington had orchestrated the attack to “prove Syria is filled with terrorists and to put us in a weak position” in order to extract political concessions. Following the attack, Bush administration officials said they hoped the incident had convinced Damascus of the dangers of Islamic terror and the need to cooperate with the West against the phenomenon.
The US and several of its European allies have repeatedly demanded over the years that Damascus close down the local offices and training camps of several organizations hostile to Israel and the West.
The identities of those who attacked the US embassy Tuesday have not been revealed. Three of the gunmen were killed by Syrian guards during the assault. A fourth was reportedly captured.
• Note also: Terror in the Levant: Who Attacked the US Embassy in Damascus – and Why?