James Glanz / The New York Times – 2007-01-28 23:27:40
Iranian Reveals Plan to Expand Role in Iraq
James Glanz / The New York Times
BAGHDAD (January 29, 2007) — ? Iran?’s ambassador to Baghdad outlined an ambitious plan on Sunday to greatly expand its economic and military ties with Iraq ? including an Iranian national bank branch in the heart of the capital ? that will almost certainly bring Iran into further conflict with American forces who have detained a number of Iranian operatives here in recent weeks.
The ambassador, Hassan Kazemi Qumi, said Iran was prepared to offer Iraqi forces training, equipment and advisers for what he called ?the security fight.? In the economic area, Mr. Qumi said, Iran was ready to assume major responsibility for the reconstruction of Iraq, an area of notable failure on the part of the United States since American-led forces overthrew Saddam Hussein in the invasion nearly four years ago.
Mr. Qumi also acknowledged, for the first time, that two Iranians seized and later released by American forces last month were security officials, as the United States had claimed. But he said that they were engaged in legitimate discussions with the Iraqi government and should not have been detained.
Mr. Qumi?s remarks, in a 90-minute interview over tea and large Iranian pistachio nuts at the Iranian Embassy here, amounted to the most authoritative and substantive response the Iranians have made yet to increasingly belligerent accusations by the Bush administration that Iran is acting against American interests in Iraq. President Bush has said the American military is authorized to take whatever action necessary against Iranians in Iraq found to be engaged in actions deemed hostile.
The Iranian ambassador abruptly agreed to a longstanding request for the interview ? made repeatedly after the first American seizure of Iranians here on Dec. 21 ? and seemed eager to rebut the accusations and assert Iran?s legitimate interests in its neighbor. How much direction, if any, he was taking from his government was unclear.
The political and diplomatic standoff that followed the Dec. 21 raid until the Iranians were released nine days later has contributed, along with a dispute over the Iranian nuclear program, to greatly increased tensions between the United States and Iran. This month, American forces detained five more Iranians in a raid on a diplomatic office in the northern city of Erbil.
While providing few details, the United States has said that evidence gleaned in the Baghdad raid, made on an Iraqi Shiite leader?s residential compound, proves the Iranians were involved in planning attacks on American and Iraqi forces.
With a look of restrained sarcasm, Mr. Qumi ridiculed the evidence that the American military has said it collected, including maps of Baghdad delineating Sunni, Shiite and mixed neighborhoods ? the kind of maps, some American officials have said, that would be useful for militias engaged in ethnic slaughter. Mr. Qumi said the maps were so common and easily obtainable that they proved nothing.
He did not say whether he believed the maps bore sectarian markings or address other pieces of evidence the Americans said that they had found, like manifests of weapons and material relating to the technology of sophisticated roadside bombs. But that is not why the Iranians were in the compound, he said.
?They worked in the security sector in the Islamic Republic, that?s clear,? Mr. Qumi said, referring to Iran.
But he said that the Iranians were in Iraq because ?the two countries agreed to solve the security problems.? The Iranians ?went to meet with the Iraqi side,? he said.
In a surprise announcement, Mr. Qumi said Iran would soon open a national bank in Iraq, in effect creating a new Iranian financial institution right under the Americans? noses. A senior Iraqi banking official, Hussein al-Uzri, confirmed that Iran had received a license to open the new bank, which Mr. Uzri said would apparently be the first ?wholly owned subsidiary bank? of a foreign country in Iraq.
?This will enhance trade between the two countries,? Mr. Uzri said.
A number of American and Iraqi officials said on Sunday that it was difficult to respond to Mr. Qumi?s statements until they had been communicated through official routes.
Sean McCormack, a State Department spokesman, said on Sunday that the United States had a significant body of evidence tying Iran to sectarian attacks inside Iraq.
?There is a high degree of confidence in the information that we already have, and we are constantly accumulating more,? Mr. McCormack said.
He did not address any of the specifics of Mr. Qumi?s comments about plans for stronger economic and security ties, but said that Iran currently plays ?a negative role in many respects? in the country.
Iraqi officials also said that they could not comment on specific programs until they had seen the details, but expressed a range of views on the wisdom of expanding ties with Iran.
?We are welcoming all the initiatives to participate in the process of reconstruction,? said Qasim Daoud, a former national security adviser who is now a secular Shiite member of Parliament.
?My belief is that our strategic alliance is with the Americans, but at the same time we are looking for the participation of any country that would like to participate,? Mr. Daoud said.
Barham Salih, a deputy prime minister who is Kurdish and whose duties include economic matters, took sharper issue with Mr. Qumi?s criticism of the American presence.
?Iraqi national interest requires seeking good neighborly relations with Iran as with other neighbors, but that requires respect for Iraqi sovereignty,? Mr. Salih said.
Mr. Qumi spoke largely in Persian during the interview, but he occasionally broke into English when he wanted to be certain that a point had been conveyed forcefully.
Although Mr. Qumi was not given specific questions ahead of the interview, he was made aware of the general topics that would be covered and seemed prepared with detailed answers in many cases. He seemed particularly keen to give his government?s view of what occurred in the early morning hours of Dec. 21, when American forces raided the Baghdad compound of Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, one of Iraq?s most powerful Shiite leaders, who had traveled to Washington only three weeks before to meet President Bush.
Within the compound, the Iranians were seized in the house of Hadi al-Ameri, who holds two powerful positions in Iraq: he is the chairman of the Iraqi Parliament?s security committee and also the leader of the Badr Organization, the armed wing of Mr. Hakim?s political party, which spent years in exile in Iran.
Although the Americans have suggested that the Iranians were providing support for militias like the Badr Organization, Mr. Qumi said that his countrymen were dealing with Mr. Ameri only in his official governmental capacity.
The Iranians would not even have stayed the night in the compound except, in a situation faced by many Baghdad residents, their business lasted beyond the early-evening curfew and they were forced to spend the night, Mr. Qumi said, dismissing the evidence, like the maps, that the Americans said linked the group to sectarian and other attacks.
?They said that they have seen maps on walls,? Mr. Qumi said. ?Hundreds of these maps you can find on the Internet.?
A senior Iraqi official expressed irritation that, even if Mr. Qumi?s account of the meeting was correct, the Iraqi government was not fully aware that Iran was making quasi-official contacts with Mr. Ameri.
?Iranians are still dealing with the Iraqi political parties as if they are still in the opposition,? the official said, referring to the parties? years in exile Iran and elsewhere.
Mr. Qumi also warned the United States against playing out tensions in what he called ?the nuclear file? in Iraq.
?We don?t need Iraq to pay the cost of our animosity with the Americans,? Mr. Qumi said.
Finally, as the interview was breaking up, Mr. Qumi called upon a bit of humor to make one last stab at the Americans. If Iran is allowed to undertake reconstruction activities in Iraq, he said, all international construction companies would be welcome. ?Urge the American companies to come here,? he said before his advisers swept him out of the room.
Abdul Razzaq al-Saiedi contributed reporting from Baghdad, and Mark Mazzetti from Washington.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company
Posted in accordance with Title 17, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.
Israel Tries to Cut Off Tehran from World Markets
David Hearst / Guardian
HERZLIYA (January 26, 2007) — Israel is launching a campaign to isolate Iran economically and to soften up world opinion for the option of a military strike aimed at crippling or delaying Tehran’s uranium enrichment programme.
Pressure will be applied to major US pension funds to stop investment in about 70 companies that trade directly with Iran, and to international banks that trade with its oil sector, cutting off the country’s access to hard currency. The aim is to isolate Tehran from the world markets in a campaign similar to that against South Africa at the height of apartheid.
Meanwhile, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is to be pursued in international courts for calling the Holocaust a myth, and saying Israel should be wiped off the map. The case will be launched under the 1948 UN convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide, which outlaws “direct and public incitement to genocide”.
Before flying to London to spearhead the mission to sell the sanctions, the Likud party leader, Binyamin Netanyahu, said: “A campaign to divest commercial investment from Iran, beginning with the large pension funds in the west … either stops Iran’s nuclear programme or it will pave the way for tougher actions. So it’s no-lose for us.”
In December the UN ordered a ban on the supply of materials that could contribute to Iran’s nuclear and missile programme, and an asset freeze on Iranian companies and individuals. But it stopped short of a full travel ban.
Israeli defence sources claim that Iran is close to the point of no return in its uranium enrichment programme using gas centrifuges.
A senior official said: “They currently have problems but if the programme is allowed to continue without interruptions we estimate they will have mastered the technology this year. We expect a declaration from them in the next month, possibly on February 21, the day of the Islamic Revolution, that they have reached significant achievements.
“It will be a bluff, but it will have the potential of marketing Iran as a regional superpower. If they do it, a nuclear Iran will cast a long shadow over the whole of the Middle East; we will have Hizbullastan in Lebanon, Hamastan here, and Shiastan in Iraq.”
Military analysts speaking at an annual conference in Herzliya, near Tel Aviv, claimed that Israel was facing an “existential threat” from the Iranian uranium enrichment programme, which Tehran has consistently claimed was for a civilian nuclear fuel cycle. The only division of opinion was over the imminence of this threat.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2007