David Evans / Bloomberg – 2010-08-04 22:46:15
(July 28, 2010) — The package arrived at Cindy Lohmanâ€™s home in Great Mills, Maryland, just two weeks after she learned that her son, Ryan, a 24-year-old Army sergeant, had been killed by a bomb in Afghanistan. It was a thick, 9-inch-by- 12-inch envelope from Prudential Financial Inc., which handles life insurance for the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Inside was a letter from Prudential about Ryanâ€™s $400,000 policy. And there was something else, which looked like a checkbook. The letter told Lohman that the full amount of her payout would be placed in a convenient interest-bearing account, allowing her time to decide how to use the benefit.
â€œYou can hold the money in the account for safekeeping for as long as you like,â€ the letter said. In tiny print, in a disclaimer that Lohman says she didnâ€™t notice, Prudential disclosed that what it called its Alliance Account was not guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its September issue.
Lohman, 52, left the money untouched for six months after her sonâ€™s August 2008 death.
â€œItâ€™s like youâ€™re paying me off because my child was killed,â€ she says. â€œIt was a consolation prize that I didnâ€™t want.â€
As time went on, she says, she tried to use one of the â€œchecksâ€ to buy a bed, and the salesman rejected it. That happened again this year, she says, when she went to a Target store to purchase a camera on Armed Forces Day, May 15.
Lohman, a public health nurse who helps special-needs children, says she had always believed that her sonâ€™s life insurance funds were in a bank insured by the FDIC. That money — like $28 billion in 1 million death-benefit accounts managed by insurers — wasnâ€™t actually sitting in a bank.
It was being held in Prudentialâ€™s general corporate account, earning investment income for the insurer. Prudential paid survivors like Lohman 1 percent interest in 2008 on their Alliance Accounts, while it earned a 4.8 percent return on its corporate funds, according to regulatory filings.
â€œIâ€™m shocked,â€ says Lohman, breaking into tears as she learns how the Alliance Account works. â€œItâ€™s a betrayal. It saddens me as an American that a company would stoop so low as to make a profit on the death of a soldier. Is there anything lower than that?â€
Millions of bereaved Americans have unwittingly been placed in the same position by their insurance companies. The practice of issuing what they call â€œcheckbooksâ€ to survivors, instead of paying them lump sums, extends well beyond the military.
In the past decade, these so-called retained-asset accounts have become standard operating procedure in an industry that touches virtually every American: There are more than 300 million active life insurance policies in the US, and the industry holds $4.6 trillion in assets, according to the American Council of Life Insurers.
Insurance companies tell survivors that their money is put in a secure account. Neither Prudential nor MetLife Inc., the largest life insurer in the US, segregates death benefits into a separate fund.
Newark, New Jersey-based Prudential, the second-largest life insurer, holds payouts in its own general account, according to regulatory filings.
New York-based MetLife has told survivors in a standard letter: â€œTo help you through what can be a very difficult, emotional and confusing time, we created a settlement option, the Total Control Account Money Market Option. It is guaranteed by MetLife.â€
No FDIC Insurance
The companyâ€™s letter omits that the money is in MetLifeâ€™s corporate investment account, isnâ€™t in a bank and has no FDIC insurance.
â€œAll guarantees are subject to the financial strength and claims-paying ability of MetLife,â€ it says.
Both MetLife, which handles insurance for nonmilitary federal employees, and Prudential paid 0.5 percent interest in July to survivors of government workers and soldiers. Thatâ€™s less than half of the rate available at some banks with accounts insured by the FDIC up to $250,000.
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. handles the paperwork and monthly statements for customers with MetLife â€œchecking accounts.â€ The insurance company, not the bank, most recently reported holding about $10 billion in death benefits, in 2008.
The â€œcheckbookâ€ system cheats the families of those who die, says Jeffrey Stempel, an insurance law professor at the William S. Boyd School of Law at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, who wrote â€˜Stempel on Insurance Contractsâ€™ (Aspen Publishers, 2009).
â€œItâ€™s institutionalized bad faith,â€ he says. â€œIn my view, this is a scheme to defraud by inducing the policyholderâ€™s beneficiary to let the life insurance company retain assets theyâ€™re not entitled to. Itâ€™s turning death claims into a profit center.â€
Prudentialâ€™s Alliance Account is helpful to families of soldiers, says company spokesman Bob DeFillippo.
â€œFor some families, the account is the difference between earning interest on a large amount of money and letting it sit idle,â€ he says. Prudential follows the law, he says. â€œWe fully and regularly disclose the nature and terms of the account to account holders,â€ DeFillippo says. â€œWe make it clear that the money can be withdrawn at any time by simply writing a draft.â€
Metlife spokesman Joseph Madden says his companyâ€™s customers are very happy with the Total Control Account.
â€œThe feedback from TCA customers has been overwhelmingly positive,â€ he says. â€œThe TCA affords beneficiaries security, peace of mind and time to make an informed decision — while earning interest in the interim.â€
Madden says the company was paying some survivors 0.5 percent in July while some others got 1.5 percent or 3 percent, depending on the age and origin of insurance accounts. The accounts donâ€™t violate any laws, Madden says, and are authorized by New York state insurance law.
Insurers are holding onto at least $28 billion owed to survivors, according to three firms that handle retained-asset accounts for about 130 life insurance companies. There are no public records showing how much companies are holding in these accounts.
The â€œchecksâ€ that Cindy Lohman wrote, the ones rejected by retailers, were actually drafts, or IOUs, issued by Prudential. Even though the â€œchecksâ€ had the name of JPMorgan Chase & Co. on them, Lohmanâ€™s funds werenâ€™t in that bank; they were held by Prudential.
Federal Bank Law
Before a check could clear, Prudential would have to send money to JPMorgan, bank spokesman John Murray says.
Insurance companies — in addition to holding onto the money of survivors, paying them uncompetitive interest rates and giving them misleading guarantees — may be violating a federal bank law. A 1933 statute makes it a felony for any company to accept deposits without state or federal authorization.
That means only banks or credit unions can accept deposits, says Arthur Wilmarth, a professor at George Washington University Law School in Washington who has testified before Congress about banking regulations.
If a prosecutor pressed an insurance company, retained- asset accounts could be outlawed because insurers say they deposit money into these accounts and donâ€™t have bank charters or banking regulation, Wilmarth says. MetLife also offers its own version of certificates of deposit.
â€œIf it swims, quacks and flies like a duck, the court could decide that it is indeed a duck,â€ he says. â€œYou then potentially could have a criminal violation.â€
Potential Bank Run
This unregulated quasi-banking system operated by insurers has none of the protections of the actual banking system. Lawrence Baxter, a professor at Duke University School of Law in Durham, North Carolina, says the potential exists for a catastrophe.
If one insurer is unable to meet its obligations on retained-asset accounts, people could lose faith in other companies and demand immediate payment, triggering a panic, says Baxter, who has consulted with federal agencies on financial regulation.
The government established the FDIC in 1933 after frantic depositors tried to pull their money from banks. The federal government has no such program for death-benefit accounts.
â€œThereâ€™s more than $25 billion out there in these accounts,â€ Baxter says. â€œA run could be triggered immediately by one insurance company not being able to honor its payout. The whole point of creating the FDIC was to put an end to bank runs.â€
No Federal Regulation
The sweeping financial regulatory legislation signed by President Barack Obama on July 21 doesnâ€™t address retained-asset accounts. It creates a new federal insurance office, which wonâ€™t be a regulator. It will collect information, monitor the industry for systemic risk and consult with state insurance regulators.
An industry with $19.1 trillion in potential liabilities will remain unregulated by the federal government. In 2008, insurers approved claims totaling $60 billion in death benefits, according to the life insurance council.
The federal government doesnâ€™t even regulate the life insurance it supplies, via MetLife, to its own employees in a program called Federal Employeesâ€™ Group Life Insurance. As the VA does for soldiers, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management sends handbook to nonmilitary government workers — some 4 million active employees and retirees.
The handbook says their life insurance policies automatically pay out death benefits in the form of a â€œmoney- market-account checkbook.â€ The 217-page handbook omits that the money isnâ€™t FDIC insured and will stay with MetLife until someone writes a â€œcheck.â€
This lack of disclosure is unconscionable, says Harvey Goldschmid, a commissioner of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from 2002 to 2005.
â€œI canâ€™t imagine why bank regulators havenâ€™t been requiring a prominent â€˜no FDIC insuranceâ€™ disclosure,â€ says Goldschmid, whoâ€™s now a law professor at Columbia University in New York. â€œThis system works very badly for the bereaved. It takes unfair advantage of people at their time of weakness.â€
The closest relative to retained-asset accounts may be money-market mutual funds, which are pools of cash invested in short-term debt securities.
Money Market Rules
The SEC requires fund companies to warn investors that money market funds donâ€™t have FDIC insurance. It also mandates that fund managers provide a prospectus, that they invest in specific types of safe debt and that they post a detailed schedule of their investments monthly on their websites.
Insurersâ€™ retained-asset accounts have none of those regulatory protections.
A June 2009 MetLife standard condolence letter to survivors leaves out that accounts arenâ€™t in a bank and arenâ€™t federally insured. In June 2010, 25 years after MetLife invented retained- asset accounts, the company released a customer agreement that does disclose that retained assets arenâ€™t in a money market account nor in a bank and that they have no FDIC insurance.
â€œThe assets backing the Total Control Accounts are maintained in MetLifeâ€™s general account and are subject to MetLifeâ€™s creditors,â€ the agreement says. That language contradicts the federal employee handbook, which says survivors get a money market account.
Gerry Goldsholle, the man who invented retained-asset accounts, says MetLife makes $100 million to $300 million a year from investment returns on the death benefits it holds. A former president of MetLife Marketing Corp., Goldsholle, 69, devised the accounts in 1984. Heâ€™s now a lawyer in private practice in Sausalito, California.
â€˜This Is Crazyâ€™
Goldsholle says he pondered the billions of dollars of death-benefit proceeds the company paid out each year.
â€œI looked at this and said this is crazy,â€ says Goldsholle, who left the firm in 1991. â€œWhat are we doing to retain some of this money? Itâ€™s very expensive to bring money in the front door of an insurance company. Youâ€™re paying very large commissions and sales expenses.â€
So he came up with a way for MetLife to hold onto death benefits.
â€œThe company would win because we would make a nice spread on the money,â€ Goldsholle says, while customers would earn interest on their accounts. MetLife, he says, can earn 1 to 3 percentage points more from its investment income — mostly from bonds — than it pays out to survivors.
The accounts Goldsholle invented have spread much faster than the ability of state regulators to track them — or even to understand how they work. Ted Hamby, North Carolinaâ€™s deputy insurance commissioner for life and health, says he believes retained-asset accounts have FDIC protection.
â€œWhatever money is on deposit in that checking account will be insured, up to the limits of the FDIC,â€ he says. Heâ€™s wrong. No retained-asset accounts have FDIC coverage.
In Connecticut, where 106 insurance companies are based, state insurance department manager for market conduct Kurt Swan also says that retained-asset accounts are kept in banks, with FDIC coverage.
â€œI think theyâ€™re just trying to offer some flexibility to the beneficiary,â€ he says. Swan and his colleague, William Arfanis, the departmentâ€™s principal financial examiner, both say the insurers donâ€™t profit from the retained-asset accounts. That too is wrong. The companies do earn investment gains on death benefits.
Just six states had any rules for retained-asset accounts as of July 2009, according to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, Nevada, North Carolina and North Dakota require insurers to disclose fees and interest rates and to tell survivors they may withdraw all of the money by writing a single check.
Maryland, which isnâ€™t on the NAIC list, also has rules.
Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner Joel Ario, whose state has no rules for retained-asset accounts, says he has asked his staff to prepare a regulation forbidding insurance companies from using such accounts as the default method of paying a death claim.
â€œI havenâ€™t heard a plausible argument about why these accounts are better for the consumer,â€ Ario says.
If state insurance regulators have paid scant attention to retained-asset accounts, state bank regulators have taken an even more hands-off approach.
â€˜Not Drawn Attentionâ€™
â€œQuite honestly, we deal with issues that our members want us to deal with,â€ says Michael Stevens, senior vice president for regulatory policy at the Washington-based Conference of State Bank Supervisors. â€œThis is not one that has drawn their attention.â€
Three companies have not only noticed but have also profited by handling retained-asset accounts for insurers. Open Solutions Inc., based in Glastonbury, Connecticut, oversees 400,000 accounts for 67 insurance companies.
Open Solutions sends out â€œcheckbooks,â€ prints periodic statements and computes accrued interest for accounts with total deposits of $10 billion, says Jay Woldar, director of sales and account management at Open Solutions.
One of its competitors, Bank of New York Mellon, administers more than 500,000 retained-asset accounts holding a total of $14 billion, including MetLifeâ€™s retained assets. Chicago-based Northern Trust Corp. handles about $4 billion in 125,000 accounts, spokesman John Oâ€™Connell says.
Survivors generally donâ€™t touch these accounts immediately.
Accounts Stay Opened
â€œAbout 40 percent of the money stays in for more than a year,â€ Woldar says. Insurers can have use of survivorsâ€™ money for years, even decades, says Randi Lichtenstein, a product line manager at Bank of New York.
â€œThey can stick around for quite a while,â€ she says. â€œThere are accounts that all insurance companies have on these platforms that go back 10, 15, 20 years.â€
MetLifeâ€™s Madden says most of its customersâ€™ retained-asset accounts are closed within one year. About 28 percent of survivors of soldiers and veterans keep their retained-asset accounts open for more than two years, the VA says.
During a routine audit completed in 2004, the New York State Insurance Department found that 1,476 retained-asset accounts, worth a total of $33.5 million, at Hartford, Connecticut-based Phoenix Life Insurance Co., had been dormant for more than three years.
In New York, funds in an account that remains dormant for more than three years may be turned over to the state. Phoenix spokeswoman Alice Ericson says the company now has a policy of sending letters to people whose accounts have been inactive for two years.
Almost one-third of the 6,890 retained-asset accounts run by Mony Life Insurance Co. were inactive for more than three years, New York auditors found in 2002. Mony is now owned by Axa SA, Europeâ€™s second-largest insurer by market value.
A few people have sued insurers over the use of retained- asset accounts. Prudential won a lawsuit in 2009 in which a survivor complained about the Alliance Account. MetLife has a case pending in which a survivor says that she was cheated by the retained-asset account. In court-filed papers, MetLife denies any wrongdoing.
There has been only one ruling by a federal appellate court on the substance of such accounts — and it went against an insurance company.
After a federal judge in Boston dismissed a policyholder suit claiming that Chattanooga, Tennessee-based insurer Unum Group was stealing account earnings from survivors, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit overruled the lower court in 2008. It reinstated the case.
â€œThe euphemistically named â€˜Security Account,â€™ accompanied with a checkbook, was no more than an IOU which did not transfer the funds to which the beneficiaries were entitled out of the plan assets,â€ the three-judge panel wrote.
Unum spokeswoman Mary Clarke Guenther says retained-asset accounts are a commonly accepted practice in the industry. The case is pending.
Absent regulatory or legal intervention, bereaved family members like Cindy Lohman will continue to find death benefits going into retained-asset accounts. Her son, Ryan, posthumously received a Purple Heart and Bronze Star Medal for sacrificing his life to save fellow soldiers in Afghanistan in August 2008.
He had ordered a Humvee to swerve to avoid an explosive device, exposing himself to its deadly blast.
â€˜Accept The Realityâ€™
Three days after learning of her sonâ€™s death, Lohman says, an Army casualty assistance officer came to her home, explaining that Ryan had a life insurance policy and that her signature was needed to release the money.
â€œBy signing that, it forced me to accept the reality that he was dead and not coming back,â€ she says.
Since 1999, the VA has allowed Prudential to send survivors â€œcheckbooksâ€ tied to its Alliance Account. In 2009 alone, the families of U.S. soldiers and veterans were supposed to be paid death benefits totaling $1 billion immediately, according to their insurance policies. They werenâ€™t.
Prudentialâ€™s VA policies promise either a lump sum payout or 36 monthly payments. About 90 percent of survivors, including Lohman, choose to receive the full amount upfront. When they do, they donâ€™t get a check; they get a â€œcheckbook.â€
Under a 2008 law, survivors covered by Prudentialâ€™s VA policy are allowed one year to put death benefits into a Roth IRA, allowing them to earn investment gains for the rest of their lives tax-free. Prudential never informed Lohman, she says.
â€˜If They Had Told Meâ€™
â€œI definitely would have done that if they had told me,â€ Lohman says.
Even Stephen Wurtz, deputy assistant director for insurance at the VA, who has overseen the insurance program for 25 years, has been kept in the dark by Prudential.
â€œPrudential runs the program on a cost-reimbursement basis only,â€ he initially said, referring to the $4.2 million in fees the VA paid Prudential in 2009. â€œTheyâ€™re really good guys. They do it patriotically. They donâ€™t make any money from the Alliance Account.â€
Wurtz, 62, said he had believed that the Alliance Account money went into a bank. After he learned that the payouts actually stayed in Prudentialâ€™s general fund, Wurtz says, he asked Prudential how much money the insurance company made from these accounts and how many dollars it held in retained assets.
Prudential declined to answer, saying that information was proprietary, Wurtz says.
â€˜Maybe I Didnâ€™tâ€™
Prudential, which has had the insurance contract with the VA since 1965, pitched the checkbook payout to the VA in 1999 as an added benefit to survivors, Wurtz says. The government agency accepted Prudentialâ€™s offer, he says. â€œMaybe I didnâ€™t ask enough questions,â€ he says.
Printed on each â€œcheck,â€ next to â€œPrudentialâ€™s Alliance Accountâ€ is the name of JPMorgan, the second-biggest U.S. bank by assets. JPMorgan spokesman Murray declined to say how much the bank is paid for its role with Prudential.
The way Prudential has set up the â€œchecksâ€ implies that JPMorgan stands behind the accounts and that they are thus backed by the FDIC, Dukeâ€™s Baxter says.
â€œThatâ€™s misleading the beneficiaries,â€ he says.
â€œWe disclose the roles of all companies involved in administering these accounts,â€ Prudentialâ€™s DeFillippo says. JPMorganâ€™s Murray declined to comment.
Prudentialâ€™s general account earned 4.4 percent in 2009, mostly from bond investments, according to SEC filings. The company has paid survivors 0.5 percent in 2010.
â€œItâ€™s shameful that an insurance company is stealing money from the families of our fallen servicemen,â€ says Paul Sullivan, who served in the 1991 Gulf War as an Army cavalry scout and is now executive director of Veterans for Common Sense, a nonprofit advocacy group based in Washington. â€œIâ€™m outraged.â€
Sullivan, a project manager at the VAâ€™s benefits unit from 2000 to 2006, says he was never told Prudential kept money and earned investment gains from soldiersâ€™ insurance payouts instead of sending it to survivors.
â€œThere shouldnâ€™t be secret profits,â€ he says. â€œThis should be transparent. The lack of oversight is appalling.â€
Itâ€™s not much different for the 4 million nonmilitary U.S. government employees and retirees — including staff of the FDIC — covered by MetLife policies. That program, begun in 1965, averages more than $2 billion in death benefits claimed every year, the government says.
Payouts are handled by the Office of Federal Employeesâ€™ Group Life Insurance. That makes it look like the government is taking care of its employeesâ€™ insurance coverage. It isnâ€™t. That â€œofficeâ€ is a unit of MetLife.
MetLife Holds the Money
Edmund Byrnes, a spokesman for the Office of Personnel Management, which oversees MetLifeâ€™s federal employee contract, says MetLife segregates death benefits into beneficiary accounts after it approves death claims.
â€œOnce MetLife transfers the funds to the Total Control Account, the monies are no longer under MetLifeâ€™s control,â€ Byrnes says.
MetLife spokesman Madden says something different.
â€œThe assets that back the liabilities on all the TCAs are placed in MetLifeâ€™s general account,â€ he says.
Back at the Veterans Affairs office, Deputy Assistant Director Wurtz, whoâ€™s a civilian employee, says he now understands for the first time that since heâ€™s covered by the federal insurance program, his own wife could receive a MetLife â€œcheckbookâ€ someday.
â€˜Ripping Off Their Ownâ€™
â€œUncle Sam is ripping off their own,â€ Wurtz says. â€œMy wife would get the money, and they would blood-suck some of it out of her.â€
It took Wurtz, whoâ€™s been working with insurers for most of his career, more than a decade to understand how retained-asset accounts work. Companies like MetLife and Prudential have never told millions of Americans with insurance policies that when they die, the insurer plans to hold their familyâ€™s money in its own account to make investment gains from the death benefit.
â€œItâ€™s outrageous that somebodyâ€™s profiting off other peopleâ€™s grief,â€ says Mark Umbrell of Doylestown, Pennsylvania. His 26-year-old son, Colby, an Army Airborne Ranger who earned a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart, was killed in Iraq in May 2007. Umbrell was among those who got a â€œcheckbookâ€ account. â€œI think weâ€™re being taken,â€ he says.
The question for Umbrell, Lohman and a million others with these accounts is whether anything will change. State bank regulators say if there are to be any reforms, they should be made by insurance departments. Officials at those state agencies often say they donâ€™t even understand what a retained-asset account is.
â€œItâ€™s flown under the radar,â€ professor Stempel says. â€œRegulators have not done their job.â€
Until public officials wake up, the bereaved will remain a secret profit center for the life insurance industry.
To contact the reporter on this story: David Evans in Los Angeles at email@example.com.
Â®2010 BLOOMBERG L.P. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.