Shock and Awe Revisited? Obama Attacks Libya Nine Years to the Day After Bush Attacked Iraq; Clinton Warns Iran over Meddling.

March 21st, 2011 - by admin

Gar Smith / AlterNet & Matthew Lee / Associated Press – 2011-03-21 00:38:11

Bush bombed Iraq 19 March 2003,
Obama bombed Libya 19 March 2011:
Change we can believe in.

Shock and Awe: Guernica Revisited
Gar Smith / AlterNet

[Author’s Note: This article was written before the US launched its ‘Shock and Awe’ attack on Baghdad on March 19, 2011. The day after the story was syndicated nationally, the Bush administration asked that the UN place a blue cloth over the Picasso painting of Guernica that hangs outside the US General Assembly.]

(January 27, 2011) — Forget Osama. Forget Saddam. The Pentagon’s newest target is the city of Baghdad.

US military strategists have announced a plan to pummel Iraq with as many as 800 cruise missiles in the space of two days. Many of these missiles would rain down on Baghdad, a city of five million people. If George W. Bush gets the war he wants, Baghdad could become the 21st century’s Guernica.

On April 26, 1937, 25 Nazi bombers dropped 100,000 pounds of bombs and incendiaries on the peaceful Basque village. Seventy percent of the town was destroyed and 1,500 people, a third of the population, were killed.

The Pentagon now predicts that the Iraq blitzkrieg could approximate the devastation of a nuclear explosion. “The sheer size of this has never been … contemplated before,” one Pentagon strategist boasted to CBS News. “There will not be a safe place in Baghdad.”

The Pentagon dubbed its cold-blooded attack plan “Shock and Awe,” a bizarre conjunction of trauma and admiration.

The concept of Shock and Awe was first developed by the Pentagon’s National Defense University (NDU) in 1996 as part of the “Rapid Dominance” strategy. The strategy was first used in Afghanistan. In their 1996 NDU book, “Shock and Awe,” authors Harlan K. Ullman and James P. Wade wrote of the need to mount an assault with “sufficiently intimidating and compelling factors to force or otherwise convince an adversary to accept our will.”

With an unsettling air of appreciation, Ullman and Wade invoked the haunting images from “old photographs and movie or television screens [depicting] the comatose and glazed expressions of survivors of the great bombardments of World War I. Those images and expressions of shock transcend race, culture and history.”

Shock and awe also were the emotions that Americans experienced on Sept. 11, 2001. Now, like the 9/11 terrorists, Bush and Co. are planning a similar act of almost unparalleled ferocity — a devastating premeditated attack on a civilian urban population.

Bush seems determined to follow in the footsteps of Hulagu Khan and Tamerlane, the Mongol warlords who laid bloody waste to Baghdad in 1258 and 1401.

But destroying Baghdad will not uncover hidden chemical, biological or nuclear weapons (if, in fact, any exist). Destroying Baghdad will not capture, topple or kill Saddam Hussein. Shock and Awe’s expressed goal is simple: in the words of Harlan Ullman, to destroy the Iraqi people “physically, emotionally and psychologically.”

Ironically, this was also the goal of the Nazi strategists who destroyed Guernica. The town had no strategic value as a military target, but, like Baghdad, it was a cultural and religious center. Guernica was devastated to terrorize the population and break the spirit of the Basque resistance.

Surely cruise missiles have been programmed to demolish the Baath Party Headquarters, presidential palaces and Republican Guard compounds. But have missiles also been preset to obliterate the al-Qadiriya Shrine, the Tomb of Imam al-A’dham and the Mosque of Sheik Abdul Qadir al-Ghailani?

We now know that there was no military need to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaski. The detonations were intended to demonstrate to the world — and to the Soviet Union, especially — that the U.S. had a functioning superweapon. Having sole possession of “The Bomb” gave Washington the power to dominate post-war world politics.

Similarly, the destruction of Baghdad seems designed to underscore Bush’s belligerent warning to the rest of the world: “You’re either with us or you’re against us.”

Washington’s new National Security Strategy describes an America dominating the world militarily, politically and economically.

In a report published a month before the U.S. presidential elections, the conservative Project for the New American Century insisted on instituting a “global U.S. pre-eminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international security order in line with American principles and interests.”

This ringing endorsement of hyper-imperialism was co-authored by Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis Libby and Jeb Bush, none of whom (with the one exception of Rumsfeld) ever volunteered for military service.

Today, thousands of citizen volunteers from around the world are converging in Iraq to stand as nonviolent “human shields” in hopes of forestalling a U.S. assault. The brave men and women in this international “Peace Army” include anti-war activists, religious witnesses, retirees, U.S. military veterans and members of families who lost loved ones in the September 11 attack.

Mr. Bush repeatedly complains that Saddam Hussein deserves to be removed from office because “he killed his own people.” If Mr. Bush fails to promptly courtmartial the officials who came up with the Shock and Awe atrocity, he may soon find himself standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Mr. Hussein and facing history’s judgment as another ruthless leader who “killed his own people” in a mad bid for power.

Gar Smith, Editor Emeritus of Earth Island Journal, is the co-founder of Environmentalists Against War.

© 2011 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.

Clinton Warns Iran over Meddling in Persian Gulf
Matthew Lee / Associated Press

PARIS (March 19, 2011) — US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton warned Iran on Saturday to stop meddling in Bahrain and other Arab states in the Persian Gulf, but also called on the kingdom’s leaders not to use force against anti-government protesters.

The workers seen among the debris of The Pearl Square statue in Manama, Bahrain, Saturday, March 19, 2011. Bahrain’s army on Friday demolished the 300-foot (90-meter) monument that had become a symbol of a month-long Shiite uprising against the Sunni monarchy in the Gulf nation. The destruction of the six white curved beams topped with a huge cement pearl underlined the resolve of the Sunni regime to root out any dissent in the kingdom, now under emergency rule.

Clinton said the United States “has an abiding commitment to Gulf security” and that “a top priority is working together with our partners on our shared concerns about Iranian behavior in the region.”

“We share the view that Iran’s activities in the Gulf, including its efforts to advance its agenda in neighboring countries, undermines peace and stability,” she told reporters after an international conference on the crisis in Libya. At that meeting, she met with numerous Arab officials who complained that Iran was fomenting unrest Bahrain and elsewhere.

Bahrain’s Sunni minority monarchy is facing growing opposition from the Shiite-majority population and has called in security forces from neighboring Sunni states such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to deal with escalating protests.

Clinton said Bahrain had a “sovereign right” to ask for such assistance, but she said violence was not the way to deal with the situation.

“Security alone cannot resolve the challenges facing Bahrain,” she said. “Violence is not and cannot be the answer. A political process is.”

She said all Bahrainis should join a national dialogue proposed by the country’s crown prince and allow that process to “unfold in a peaceful positive atmosphere that protects the freedom of peaceful assembly.”

The Gulf force underscores the deep worries about Bahrain’s stability among the region’s Sunni kings and sheiks. They fear any stumble by Bahrain’s leaders could embolden more challenges to their own regimes and possibly open room for Shiite heavyweight Iran to make political inroads.

The U.S., which counts Bahrain as a centerpiece of its Gulf military framework, has sent top envoys to meet with the embattled monarchy and has been criticized by Shiite opposition groups for not coming to their support. Bahrain hosts the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet, which is the Pentagon’s main regional counterweight to Iran’s growing military powers.

On Friday, officials wiped away a main symbol of the uprising. Cranes pulled down the 300-foot (90-meter) monument at the heart of a landmark square that has been occupied by protesters and the scene of deadly confrontations.

Security forces overran the camp on Wednesday, setting off clashes that killed at least five people, including two policemen. At least 12 people have been killed in the monthlong revolt.

Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.