At UN Nuclear Conference, Syria Blast the US for Ignoring Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal

September 21st, 2012 - by admin

Reuters & The Jerusalem Post & Al Jazeera – 2012-09-21 00:33:55

Syria Accuses West of Double Standards over Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal
Reuters & The Jerusalem Post

VIENNA (September 19, 2012) — Syria, itself suspected of illicit nuclear activity, accused the West at a major UN meeting on Wednesday of double standards in implicitly condoning an Israeli atomic arsenal and warned of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

Israel hit back at the annual assembly of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) by saying Syria and its ally Iran were “known for their clandestine pursuit of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction.”

Israel also made clear its view that the volatile region was not yet ready for creating a zone free of such weaponry, which Arab states have been pushing for.

“Such a process can only be launched when peaceful relations exist for a reasonable period of time in the region,” Israeli atomic energy commission head Shaul Chorev said. “Regrettably, the realities in the Middle East are far from being conducive.”

The United States said last week Syria was using the “brutal repression” of its people waging an uprising as an excuse not to address international concerns about its past nuclear work.

UN inspectors have long sought access to a site in Syria’s desert Deir al-Zor region that US intelligence reports say was a nascent, North Korean-designed reactor designed to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons before Israel bombed it in 2007.

The IAEA has also been requesting information about three other sites that may have been linked to Deir al-Zor, which Syria says was a conventional military site.

Syrian Ambassador Bassam Al-Sabbagh, in a rare public comment on the issue, insisted that his country was ready to cooperate with the UN agency and he sought to turn the tables on Damascus’s accusers by hitting out at Israel.

Israel is believed to have the Middle East’s only nuclear arsenal, although it refuses to disclose any capability. Like its ally the United States, the Jewish state sees Iran’s nuclear program as the most urgent nuclear proliferation threat.

Clearly referring to Washington and its allies, Al-Sabbagh told the IAEA’s General Conference in Vienna:
“The fact that some influential states … condone Israel’s possession of nuclear capabilities and its failure to subject them to any international control exposes clearly the extent of double standards used by those states.”

He said that this “poses a threat to the region’s security and stability and may even spark a nuclear arms race there” and that Israel was the main obstacle to ridding the region of atomic weaponry.

Israel has said it would sign the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and renounce nuclear weapons only as part of a broader Middle East peace deal with Arab states and Iran that guaranteed its security.

Chorev, the Israeli delegate, said the concept of a region free of weapons of mass destruction “is certainly much less applicable to the current volatile and hostile” Middle East and would require a significant transformation in the region.

Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful, denying Western and Israeli suspicions that it wants to develop an atom bomb capability. Syria also denies any such ambitions.

IAEA chief Yukiya Amano said this year that Syria had asked for understanding of its “delicate situation” in response to requests for Syrian cooperation with his inspectors.

Syrian President Bashar Assad is fighting an 18-month-old revolt in which more than 27,000 people have been killed.

Chorev said the situation in Syria was a reminder of the need to secure nuclear materials and added that the whereabouts of atomic fuel intended for the destroyed Deir al-Zor reactor was an “enigma”.
All rights reserved (c) 1995 — 2012 The Jerusalem Post.

Iran and Israel Face Off at IAEA Meeting
Al Jazeera

(September 21, 2012) — Iran and Israel have clashed at the annual meeting of the UN atomic agency, further throwing into doubt a hoped-for 2012 conference on creating a Middle East free of nuclear weapons.

In lively debates at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) gathering of its 155 member states, Iran said on Thursday that Israel should accede to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty aimed at stopping the spread of nuclear weapons.

“At present the Israeli regime is the only non-party to the NPT [Non-Proliferation Treaty] in this region despite repeated calls by the international community,” Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Iran’s envoy to the IAEA, said.

“Peace and stability cannot be achieved in the Middle East while the massive nuclear arsenal of that regime continues to threaten the region and beyond,” he said.

Ehud Azoulay, the Israeli envoy, in turn pointed the finger at Iran and Syria, saying “the most significant threats to the nuclear non-proliferation regime are those … that pursue weapons under the guise of their NPT membership”.

“It is Iran which represents the greatest threat to peace and security in the Middle East and beyond,” he said. “No words in this room could distort the real facts behind Iran’s drive to nuclear weapons.”

‘Irresponsible Behaviour’
Neither Iran nor Israel has said whether they plan to attend a conference being organised by Finland on creating a Middle East free of atomic weapons that is meant to be held before the end of the year.

But Shaul Horev, the head of Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC), said at the IAEA on Wednesday that the “current volatile and hostile” situation in the region was not “conducive” to the creation of such a zone.

“Such a process can only be launched when peaceful relations exist for a reasonable period of time in the region,” Horev said, according to a transcript of his speech.

Soltanieh, Iran’s envoy, said on Thursday that the “irresponsible behaviour of this (Israeli) regime … has put the establishment of such a zone in the region for the near future in serious doubt,” calling Israel the “only obstacle”.

At the IAEA meeting, member states approved with a crushing majority on Thursday a call for all Mideast countries to accede to the NPT, in a move that was slammed by the US envoy, Robert Wood.

“Israel recognises the importance of the non-proliferation regime … yet proven experience in the Middle East has shown that the NPT does not provide a remedy to the security challenges of the region,” David Danieli, the deputy head of Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission, said on Thursday.

The US and other Western states abstained from the vote on the general call, however.

‘Goodwill Gesture’
Arab states said on Thursday they had decided as a “goodwill gesture” to refrain from specifically targeting Israel with a resolution over its assumed nuclear arsenal.

Arab envoys said the move was in support of wider efforts to rid the region of nuclear weapons. But it drew no public praise from Israel or the US, which criticised the placing of the issue — even if not worded with direct reference to Israel — on the agenda in the first place.

Addressing the debate on “Israeli nuclear capabilities” called by the Arab countries, US envoy Wood said Washington was firmly committed to the goal of a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction.

However, “using meetings of the IAEA to single out Israel for censure will not take us one step closer to that goal. In fact, it is a step in the opposite direction,” Wood told the meeting.

“Repeatedly invoking this issue only serves to reduce trust and confidence among states in the region and to distract the agency’s attention from serious issues of ongoing non-compliance by two other states in the region,” Wood said.

That was a reference to Iran and Syria, which are under investigation by the IAEA over their disputed atomic activities.

Meanwhile, the US, Britain and France warned Iran at the UN Security Council on Thursday that time is running out for a negotiated settlement to the showdown on its nuclear programme.

“Time is wasting,” US ambassador Susan Rice told a meeting on nuclear sanctions against Iran. Iran is “at a crossroads”, warned Britain’s UN envoy Mark Lyall Grant.

Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.