Ban Depleted Uranium.org & International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons – 2012-11-10 23:34:29
The US must stop blocking international action on depleted uranium weapons!
Ban Depleted Uranium.org
(November 10, 2012) — The United Nations First Committee just voted on a fourth resolution regarding the Effects of the Use of Armaments and Ammunitions Containing Depleted Uranium (DU). The text reiterates the UN Environment Program’s repeated request for a precautionary approach to these weapons and 138 countries supported the vote on November 5th yet the United States, a producer and user of these weapons, together with the United Kingdom, France and Israel were the only four to vote against. They also sought to block similar resolutions in 2007, 2008 and 2010. The UN General Assembly makes a final vote this December.
The US Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI) has conducted cellular and animal studies which show that DU can turn cells cancerous, cause chromosome damage, leukemia and genomic instability. This damage can also be passed on to the next generation.
The US used these weapons in Iraq and in the Balkans. The US continues to block the global pressure for further studies and greater transparency from users.â€¨
Enough is Enough!
Thousands of citizens around the world are calling on the US to reconsider their voting position on these indiscriminate and unacceptable weapons that put civilians and military personnel at risk. Signatures have been handed over to the UN US Mission in New York with this appeal to reason. We will continue with our global outreach until these weapons are banned.
Please sign our online petition and actively join our efforts.
Refresh yourself on the proposed resolution.
UN General Assembly Resolution Agenda Item 94(e). General and complete disarmament: effects of the use of armaments and ammunitions containing depleted uranium — Indonesia:* draft resolution
UN Vote Backs Precautionary Approach to Depleted Uranium Weapons
International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons (ICBUW)
(November 6, 2012) — The United Nations First Committee has passed its fourth and most far reaching resolution to date on DU weapons. The resolution recalls the positions taken by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) after their fieldwork on DU affected sites in the Balkans, which called for a precautionary approach to DU. In UNEPâ€™s view, precaution should be backed by clean-up and decontamination, awareness raising measures to reduce the risk of civilian exposure and the long-term monitoring of contaminated sites.
The resolution was tabled by the Non-Aligned Movement and, as with previous years, the text was actively opposed by the US, UK and France. The three DU users once again argued that various agencies such as the WHO, NATO and IAEA have undertaken long term studies into DUâ€™s health and environmental impact.
However, this simplification ignored the fact that none of the bodies cited have undertaken long-term health or environmental studies into civilian populations affected by DU contamination. The three states also complained that UNEPâ€™s position had been selectively quoted, in spite of UNEP highlighting the need for precaution and remedial measures after each of its field assessments.
â€œICBUW welcomes this resolution as another valuable step towards global action on DU and all toxic remnants of war,â€ said an ICBUW spokesperson. â€œWe are particularly pleased that a significant majority of states accept that precaution is justified and recognise the need for post-conflict measures to protect civilian health from the toxic legacy of conflict.
“This resolution helps reinforce the need for environmental and health protection norms to be adopted to reduce the humanitarian impact of conflict.â€
Other states also submitted explanations for their votes. Germany voiced the concerns from the UK and France outlined above about UNEPâ€™s position. Japan recognised that uncertainties over the long-term impact of the weapons continue and called for more research on the ground and a greater role for civil society in the debate.
The Netherlands continued to highlight their discomfort with the resolution wording, arguing that they would prefer the term â€˜possible health effectsâ€™ instead of â€˜potential health effectsâ€™. Finally Belgium once again highlighted that it had been the first state to ban the weapons through recourse to the precautionary principle and offered its assistance to any UN member states that are considering their own domestic legislation.
The resolution built on previous texts and once again included a call for greater transparency from DU users. It contained the same language as 2010â€™s resolution which called for states to transfer quantitative and geographic data on DU usage to affected governments when requested to do so.
The US had refused to share data on DU use in Iraq with UNEP, something that, together with security problems, ensured that they were unable to fully survey contamination in the country.
First Committee resolutions are voted on for a second time early in December by the full UN General Assembly. While General Assembly resolutions are non-binding in character, they are a useful means of raising awareness of arms control issues.
International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons — ICBUW.org
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom — WILPFUS.org/
Veterans For Peace — VeteransForPeace.org/