Allison Frankel / ACLU Human Rights – 2013-02-08 00:53:17
(February 7, 2013) — The Obama Administration recently underwent its first UN treaty body review, and the resulting concluding observations made public yesterday should be a cause for alarm.
The observations, issued by independent UN experts tasked with monitoring compliance with the international treaty on the rights of children in armed conflict (formally known as the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict or “OPAC”), paint a dark picture of the treatment of juveniles by the US military in Afghanistan:
One where hundreds of children have been killed in attacks and air strikes by US military forces, and those responsible for the killings have not been held to account even as the number of children killed doubled from 2010 to 2011;
Where children under 18 languish in detention facilities without access to legal or full humanitarian assistance, or adequate resources to aid in their recovery and reintegration as required under international law.
Some children were abused in US detention facilities, and others are faced with the prospect of torture and ill-treatment if they are transferred to Afghan custody.
By ratifying OPAC in 2002, the US committed to guaranteeing basic protections to children in armed conflict zones, and to submit periodic reports on the implementation of its treaty obligations to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. We wrote about the latest US report, released in November, which revealed that over 200 children have been held in US custody in Afghanistan since 2008, some for lengthy periods of time.
During its review of the US on January 16, the Committee posed critical questions about the treatment of children by the US military and issued recommendations to remedy these human rights violations.
These recommendations include taking “concrete and firm precautionary measures [to] prevent indiscriminate use of force” particularly against children, and ensuring all allegations of unlawful use of force are “investigated in a transparent, timely and independent manner” and that “children and families victims of attacks and air strikes do always receive redress and compensation.”
In regard to the detention of juveniles, the Committee urged the US to ensure that all children under 18 are detained separately from adults and guaranteed access to free and independent legal assistance as well as an independent complaints mechanism. Importantly, considering the previous US response to the Committee revealed that the average age of children detained by US forces is only 16 years old and the average length of stay for juveniles in US military custody has been approximately one year, the Committee recommended children be detained only “as measures of last resort and for the shortest possible period of time and that in all cases alternatives to detention are given priority.”
The Committee also stressed that allegations of torture and other forms of mistreatment must be investigated and the perpetrators brought to justice, and that no child should be transferred to Afghan custody if “there are substantial grounds for the danger of being subject to torture and ill treatment.”
The Committee specifically mentioned the case of Omar Kadr, a former child soldier who was detained by US forces at the age of 15 and was subjected to torture and a systematic program of harsh and highly coercive interrogations at the American prisons at GuantÃ¡namo Bay and Bagram.
The US government’s human rights obligations do not end with the release of a periodic report or the completion of a treaty body review. In order to give meaning to the words of the children’s rights treaty, the US must work diligently to implement the Committee’s recommendations and ensure that our military forces, intelligence agents, and other government officials treat children in the war zones of Afghanistan and elsewhere in accordance with international law.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.