Rabbi Michael Lerner / Tikkun, the Network of Spiritual Progressives and Peace Action West – 2013-03-04 21:22:56
(March 2, 2013) — The run-up to war doesn’t happen overnight. It’s made up of small steps to slowly build acceptance for the idea of military action.
A group of senators have introduced just such a bill that urges US military and other support if Israel attacks Iran. Tell your senators to oppose this backdoor to war with Iran.
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a powerful lobbying group with hawkish positions on Iran and a blind support for Israel’s right-wing government that has been agitating for a preemptive first strike on Iran, is marching on the Hill this week, bringing thousands of supporters to DC to lobby in favor of this bill.
That’s why we at the interfaith (and atheist-welcoming) Network of Spiritual Progressives have aligned ourselves with Peace Action to challenge AIPAC. AIPAC does not speak for me! Does it speak for you?
I wish J Street and the Reform Action Center were willing to openly challenge AIPAC, but these very decent organizations are so interested in maintaining their appearance of being “centrist” and pro-Israel that they shy away from confrontations with AIPAC even though AIPAC’s policies frequently support directions that are really bad for Israel, for the Palestinian people, for world Jewry, and for global peace!!! So that’s why it is so essential to have the voice of Tikkun and the Network of Spiritual Progressives, in alliance with other groups, challenging this destructive direction.
In Tikkun magazine we’ve explained in detail why an assault on Iran is destructive to Israel’s best interests, and destructive to the best interests of the U.S. and global peace. With your help, we bought a full page ad against a first strike on Iran, and we would like to do that again, this time in the Washington Post.
If you wish to sign and donate to such an ad, please click here. If you have trouble donating on line, send us a check made out to Tikkun and sent to Tikkun/No War on Iran, 2342 Shattuck Ave, #1200, Berkeley, Ca. 94704.
It is very difficult for senators to say no to pressure to support this bill if they aren’t hearing from the other side. Your senators need to hear from you right now. And Peace Action West has set up the mechanism to get your message to them right away. Just Click Here.
While the resolution is nonbinding, it sends a very dangerous message. When powerful senators from both parties officially announce that the US should back Israel in the event of an ill-conceived attack on Iran, it undermines ongoing diplomatic efforts and normalizes the idea of bombing Iran.
We know an attack on Iran would be shortsighted and tragic. Let your senators know you’re not going to sit back quietly while they take us on a path toward war. Take action now. Support our ad, and support the message to your Senators!
Tikkun/Network of Spiritual Progressives
Please, Senator Boxer, take off the gloves. Remember, it was the US that gave the dictatorial Shah of Iran the country’s first nuclear technology.
And CONSIDER: What is the downwind environmental and human consequence of bombing a nuclear installation. A “pre-emptive attack” is merely a euphemism for the worst international crime — “aggression.” We staged a “pre-emptive” attack against Iraq because of WMDs that did not exist. We bombed North Vietnam for a Gulf of Tonkin attack that never happened.
If pre-emptive attacks were justifiable, we would have to accept that Israel’s neighbors have a greater claim to that option since Israel is the only country in the region with nuclear weapons and Israel has committed a serious of aggressive acts — including ground invasions and bombing targets inside neighboring nations.
I am very disappointed that you are cosponsoring S. Res. 65. This bill is dangerous and undermines diplomatic efforts with Iran.
The language in the bill, which “urges that, if the Government of Israel is compelled to take military action in self-defense, the United States Government should stand with Israel and provide diplomatic, military, and economic support to the Government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people, and existence,” is very disturbing.
The US Senate should not go on record declaring support for a potential military action against Iran. It is a small step toward accepting the idea of attacking Iran. A war with Iran would be catastrophic and would not make the US safer.
Please remove your name from the bill. I would like a response explaining your actions on this issue.
Click here to unsubscribe
Copyright 2010 Network of Spiritual ProgressivesÂ®.
2342 Shattuck Avenue, #1200
Berkeley, CA 94704
510-644-1200 Fax 510-644-1255
No, Mr. Netanyahu, No, President Obama:
No War on Iran and No First Strike
Some of us who signed this ad believe that even a nuclear Iran — faced with the certainty that its first aggressive use of nuclear weapons would engender a massive retaliation sufficient to kill most of the people of Iran — would not dare take a first nuclear strike against Israel or the United States.
Americans once perceived the Soviet Union to be equally evil, irrational, and driven by ideological fundamentalism — yet the Soviet Union, armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons, was constrained by the possibility of mutually assured destruction. The same is likely to be true of Iran should its ideologically driven fundamentalist leaders ever decide to develop nuclear weapons.
Some of us fear that electoral pressures have pushed President Obama and many Democrats in Congress to abandon the strategy of containment used with all the other nuclear powers and instead to coerce Iran into not developing nukes.
We agree with the goal of non-proliferation, but believe that the only way to restrain the development of nukes by other states like Iran, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt is for the current nuclear powers — including the U.S., U.K., France, Russia, China, North Korea, India, Pakistan, and Israel — to disarm their own nuclear weapons.
President Obama: show some leadership by making dramatic advances in negotiating the universal elimination of nuclear weapons contained in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty instead of only taking seriously the parts of that treaty calling for others to not obtain such weapons!
Unfortunately, President Obama made clear when he spoke to AIPAC on March 4 that he and Netanyahu only disagree about how long to use economic coercion (creating suffering for ordinary Iranians) before they revert to military attacks. Yet many of us who signed this ad believe that coercion is not in the best interests of the U.S., Israel, the Jewish people, or world peace.
The only path to peace is a path of peace and non- violence. Our means must be as holy as our ends. President Obama: please show some leadership by affirming the value of non-violence even when dealing with a state like Iran.
Break the cycles of violence that have physically, ethically, and spiritually wounded the human race for so much of its history. We know the outcome of the strategy of domination and violence. It’s time to use a fundamentally different approach.
Some of us believe that Israel could actually work out peaceful relations with Iran and enhance its own security and U.S. security by ending the Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, helping the Palestinian people create an economically and politically viable state, taking generous steps to alleviate the humiliation and suffering of Palestinian refugees, and supporting Palestinian membership in the United Nations.
Those steps, done with a spirit of openhearted generosity toward the Palestinian people and the people of all the surrounding states, is far more likely than military strikes against Iran or endless assaults on Hamas to provide a safe and secure future for Israel.
Similarly, if the United States were to apologize for its role in overthrowing the democratically elected government of Iran in 1953 and ushering in the Shah’s dictatorial regime, it would strengthen the hands of those in Iran who seek an overthrow of the even worse Islamic fundamentalist regime that now terrorizes the people of Iran.
Why might this work better than military attacks? Some who have signed this ad believe that the best path to homeland security is through rejecting the old-fashioned “domination strategy” of exercising power against those whom we fear.
Domination strategies elicit fear, resentment at not being treated as a people who deserve respect, and then a desire to strike back. Instead we believe that what spiritual progressives call a “generosity strategy” based on caring for the other, compassion, and genuine respect for differences is likely to prove the most effective way to achieve long-term safety. The more the U.S. detaches from its previous role as the military champion of Western economic selfishness toward other countries in defense of their own global corporations, the more our influence will increase.
The Global Marshall Plan introduced to Congress as House Res. 157 by Hon. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) — a plan developed by Tikkun magazine and the Network of Spiritual Progressives — offers a concrete vision for such a strategy of generosity.
Please read it at www.tikkun.org/GMP. We offer this in a spirit of humility, knowing that no one can be sure of what is going to happen in the future, but certain that what has happened in the past with the domination approach to the world’s problems has often led to worse disasters than whatever it was designed to forestall.
None of us who sign this statement accept as legitimate the denial of human rights in Iran, the pretense of democracy, the oppression of the Bahai, the denial of the Holocaust, or the right of Iran to verbally threaten the existence of the State of Israel. Our opposition to a war does not come from support for the Iranian regime.
The path of generosity outlined above will likely enhance, not weaken, Israeli, American, and global security, whereas an attack on Iran will make it hard for the democratic forces in Iran that oppose the current dictatorial regime to withstand nationalistic pressures to unite behind its current leaders against a foreign invader (Israel or the U.S.).
The signers of this ad do not agree on all of the statements above. Whatever the diversity of our perspectives, here’s what we do all agree upon:
No war. No preemptive first strikes on Iran.
We call upon our fellow citizens to:
1) Send this ad to your congressional representatives, members of your state legislature and city council, and ask them to endorse the strategy of generosity reflected in the Global Marshall Plan (www.spiritualprogressives.org/GMP) and introduced to Congress as H. Res. 157;
2) Refuse to vote for any candidate who supports first strikes against Iran or any other nation state;
3) Donate at www.tikkun.org/iran or by sending a check to Tikkun at 2342 Shattuck Ave, Berkeley, CA 94704, so that we can spread this message in U.S. and Israeli media.
This ad was developed by Rabbi Michael Lerner and circulated by Tikkun magazine and its interfaith Network of Spiritual Progressives (NSP). NSP includes all religions plus atheists, agnostics, and secular humanists who support a world based on love, non-violence, and caring for “the other.” We unite people who are ready to affirm the possibility of a world based on these principles.
If you wish to know more about our perspective on how to build peace in the Middle East, please read Tikkun editor Rabbi Michael Lerner’s 2012 book: Embracing Israel and Palestine: A Strategy to Heal and Transform the Middle East available through www.tikkun.org/EIP or on Kindle from Amazon.com.
This ad is cosponsored by the Shalom Center (www.theshalomcenter.org) under the direction of Rabbi Arthur Waskow. This ad has been signed by clergy, opinion shapers, social change activists, spiritual progressives from every religious community, and citizens like you. You can send us your ideas on how YOU would like to help us in building a movement along the lines specified in this ad by writing to email@example.com.