Advocates for War: America’s Corporate Think Tanks — Part 2

October 15th, 2013 - by admin

Public Accountability Initiative – 2013-10-15 15:55:12

Part II. Think Tanks

Brookings Institution
Industry Ties: Brookings is an influential research and policy think tank that works in many major policy areas, including defense and foreign policy. In its most recent annual report Brooking’s corporate donors include some prominent names in the defense industry.100 The bulleted points below give the donation level and each defense industry contractor that gave at that level.

* $1-2.5 million: Booz Allen Hamilton

* $500 thousand – $1 million: Qualcomm Inc.

* $50 — 100 thousand: Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Palantir Technologies

In addition to organizational funding, Brookings has several industry-connected individuals in its ranks. David Rubenstein, co-founder and co-CEO at the Carlyle Group, the majority shareholder of Booz Allen Hamilton and the company responsible for taking the firm public in 2010, is co-chair of Brookings’ board of trustees.

He also made a personal contribution at the $1-2.5 million level, according to the 2012 annual report.101 Another Brookings trustee, Ken Duberstein, is a director of Boeing, the second largest defense contractor in the United States. 102, 103

Brookings employs Booz Allen Hamilton vice president and senior fellow, Ronald Sanders as adjunct faculty. 104 Sanders also chairs Brookings’ Executive Education’s Advisory Council, most recently heading up a Brookings event entitled “Enterprise Leadership: The Essential Framework for Today’s Government Leaders,” which featured Booz Allen senior vice president Admiral Thad Allen as keynote speaker. 105, 106

Syria commentary: The Brookings Institution’s commentary on intervention in Syria was cited in 31 articles. Though largely logistical and focused on analysis of the President’s response and effects of Congressional involvement, some analysts weighed in on intervention specifically, advocating missile strikes and offering public relations pointers.

Michael O’Hanlon, national security analyst at Brookings, urged a comparison between the hypothetical Syria intervention and President Clinton’s punitive missile strikes against Iraq on NPR, saying that the operation would be “small scale” and “over as soon as it’s begun”:

Michael O’Hanlon, a national security analyst at The Brookings Institution, said that for all the contrasts with the 2003 Iraq invasion, the more apt comparison in Syria is with missile strikes ordered against Iraq by President Bill Clinton, including strikes in 1998 to punish Saddam for not complying with U.N. chemical weapons inspections.

“I’m surprised this administration doesn’t make that analogy,” O’Hanlon said. “This operation is going to be limited. It’s going to be small scale or medium scale and it’s going to be over as soon as it’s begun practically. We’re going to hear about the beginning, middle and end of it all in one Pentagon briefing, more or less.” 107

Ken Pollack, senior fellow in the Saban Center for Middle East Policy, Brookings Institution, drew a comparison between intervention in Syria and the (positively viewed) US intervention in Kosovo in the late 1990s, also on NPR, implying that opposition to intervention is largely due to bad public relations:

One path may be persuading NATO to get involved or even lead any military action. That helped the Clinton administration cast a frame of legitimacy on the Kosovo war in the late 1990s even though the Security Council, with Russia firmly opposed, never sanctioned the bombing campaign against Belgrade, said Ken Pollack, an expert on Middle Eastern political-military affairs at the Brookings Institute.

“Very famously, the Kosovo war was not legal,” Pollack said. “Yet . . . you don’t have people running around screaming that the Kosovo war was illegal. That is because the US did a good job of building a case for it.” 108

Center for Strategic and International Studies
Industry Ties: The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) is an established foreign policy think tank with a long roster of corporate executives and government officials serving as trustees [109] and counselors. 110 CSIS has more defense industry connected advisors than most think tanks, including at its highest level of leadership: its president and CEO, John J Hamre, serves as a director for defense contractor SAIC. 111

* CSIS trustee James McNerney is president, CEO, and chairman of the board at Boeing. 112

* CSIS senior advisor Margaret Sidney Ashworth is the corporate vice president for government relations at Northrop Grumman and former Raytheon lobbyist. 113

* CSIS Advisory Board member Thomas Culligan is senior vice president at Raytheon. 114

* CSIS Advisory Board member Gregory Dahlberg is senior vice president of Washington operations at Lockheed Martin. 115

* CSIS Advisory Board member Timothy Keating is senior vice president of public policy at Boeing. 116

* CSIS Roundtable member Gregory Gallopoulos is senior vice president, general counsel and secretary at General Dynamics. 117

* CSIS trustee Ray L Hunt is a former Halliburton director. 118

* Trustee James L Jones is a former director of General Dynamics and Boeing. 119

Syria Commentary: CSIS’ experts were cited in 30 articles on intervention in Syria, often advocating for greater military action than the target strikes being considered by Secretary Kerry.

Anthony Cordesman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy for CSIS and a former national security assistant to Senator John McCain said limited strikes would be “pointless”:

Others said that Mr. Obama needs to go beyond cruise-missile strikes. “Simply taking reprisal action to say ‘We mean it’ does not strike me as significant meaningful action,” said Anthony Cordesman, a longtime military analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “It’s a pointless punitive military exercise.” 120

In another article Cordesman said that the planned strikes would cause “lasting” damage to Assad:

Defense analyst Anthony Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank said if successful, hitting fixed targets would eliminate key assets to Assad that “can’t easily be replaced, like command and control facilities, major headquarters.”

“These are lasting targets,” Cordesman said. 121

In yet another article Cordesman said that the limited strikes would send a message of weakness and hypothetically incentivize similar regimes to use nuclear weapons:

“If anything, the message of a narrowly focused US strike could be just the opposite of what the US intends,” says Anthony Cordesman, a defense analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“To the world’s worst regimes, the unintended message of limited strikes that leave their governments intact may be that that if you are going to use such weapons, use them decisively enough to make any international action worth the cost,” he adds. “Worse, such actions may lead regimes to question the utility of using weapons with limited value in deterring international intervention, like chemical weapons. Instead, they may be incentivized to go nuclear, go cyber, or support violent non-state actors.” 122

Institute for the Study of War
Industry ties: The Institute for War Studies’ close connection to defense contractors is well documented. ISW Founder and President Kimberly Kagan was criticized in a December 2012 Washington Post article for “pro bono” advisory services she and her husband provided to General Petraeus. 123

The article noted that Kagan’s proximity to the general “provided an incentive for defense contractors to contribute” to her think tank and “during Petraeus’s tenure in Kabul, she sent out a letter soliciting contributions so the organization could continue its military work.” Most telling of how the deep ties between ISW and the defense industry are bolstered is the following anecdote from the Washington Post, describing their 2011 dinner honoring Petraeus:

At the August 2011 dinner honoring Petraeus, Kagan thanked executives from two defense contractors who sit on her institute’s corporate council, DynCorp International and CACI International. The event was sponsored by General Dynamics. All three firms have business interests in the Afghan war.

Kagan told the audience that their funding allowed her to assist Petraeus. “The ability to have a 15-month deployment essentially in the service of those who needed some help — and the ability to go at a moment’s notice — that’s something you all have sponsored,” she said.

She called her work for him “an extraordinary and special occasion.”

After accepting the award, Petraeus heaped praise on the institute.

“Thanks to all of you for supporting an organization that General Keane very accurately described as filling a niche — a very, very important one,” he said. “It’s now a deployable organization. We’re going to start issuing them combat service stripes.”

ISW’s Corporate Council is a “Who’s Who” of the defense industry and includes Raytheon, SAIC, Palantir, General Dynamics, CACI, Northrop Grumman, DynCorp, and L-3 Communication.124 Raytheon, of course, is the manufacturer of the Tomahawk cruise missile, widely understood as the weapon of choice for the proposed strike and the featured armament in Harmer’s ISW study.

Syria commentary: The Institute for the Study of War was cited in 22 articles on intervention. The message from analysts from the ISW focused on quelling the notion that the opposition forces, which stood to gain from a US intervention, are extremists and argued in favor of immediate strikes over waiting for Congress.

Christopher Harmer, a senior naval analyst with the Middle East Security Project at the Institute for the Study of War, released a widely circulated study on the use of Tomahawk missiles for a “surgical” strike against Assad. The study was touted by Sen. John McCain as proof that limited strikes were a viable intervention strategy. (From Foreign Policy):

In July, Harmer authored a widely-circulated study showing how the US could degrade key Syrian military installations on the cheap with virtually no risk to US personnel. “It could be done quickly, easily, with no risk whatsoever to American personnel, and a relatively minor cost,” said Harmer. One of the study’s proposals was cruise missile strikes from what are known as TLAMs (Tomahawk land attack missiles) fired from naval vessels in the Mediterranean. 125

In addition to advocating for intervention, Harmer was critical of any delay in the strikes. From Bloomberg:

While a delay doesn’t present “insurmountable difficulty” for the US, Assad will benefit from time to prepare for an attack, said Christopher Harmer, an analyst with the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War who follows the Syrian military.

The decision to wait for a vote in Congress lets Assad disperse his forces and equipment and allows Syria’s ally, Russia, to reposition some of its Black Sea fleet into the Mediterranean, Harmer said. It also provides Assad a “considerable psychological advantage within Syria,” he said.

“It strains credibility to assert that the effect of delaying action is positive for the US and negative for the Assad regime,” Harmer said in an e-mail. 126

Prior to her dismissal from ISW for lying about holding a Ph.D. from Georgetown University, Elizabeth O’Bagy, who also worked for the Syrian Emergency Task Force, was quoted in several articles supporting intervention and arguing that opposition forces were not linked to extremists groups as feared. Her articles were influential enough to be quoted by Secretary Kerry. From Reuters:

Kerry cited an article by Elizabeth O’Bagy, an analyst with the Institute for the Study of War think tank, in which she wrote that Islamic extremist factions are not “spearheading the fight against the Syrian government,” but rather that the struggle is b eing led by “moderate opposition forces.”127

Council on Foreign Relations
Industry ties: The Council on Foreign Relations claims over 4,700 members and boasts many celebrity and high profile members among those ranks including Brian Williams, Fareed Zakaria, Angelina Jolie, Chuck Hagel, and Erin Burnett. 128 Its prominence lends it a gravitas that obscures substantial conflicts of interest.

CFR has a robust corporate membership [129] program that includes many of the top companies in the defense industry including Booz Allen Hamilton, DynCorp, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Palantir. Each company paid between $30,000 and $100,000 for varying levels of access to CFR’s experts and directors.

CFR’s board members include many individuals with defense industry ties, such as R. Nicholas Burns (profiled above), Ann Fudge, a director of General Electric, and Donna J. Hrinak, an executive at Boeing. The vice chairman of CFR’s board of directors is David Rubenstein, co-founder and co-CEO of top Booz Allen shareholder the Carlyle Group.

Individual memberships are similarly stocked with defense industry insiders. CFR members Thad Allen and Tom Moorman are Booz Allen Hamilton executives, while members Robert Millard and John P White are Directors at L-3 Communication. CFR member Norman Augustine was the chairman and CEO of Lockheed Martin.

Syria commentary: CFR’s analysts and experts were cited in 19 articles on intervention in Syria. Much of CFR’s pro-intervention commentary came from CFR President Richard Haass130 who advocated directly arming the Syrian opposition in addition to the proposed limited strikes:

Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, said providing “significant” arms to the rebels would be the best way to help shape the battlefield and influence the outcome in Syria.

“I think the strikes are in a narrow way successful by simply occurring,” Haass said. “It shows that you cannot use these weapons and get off scot-free,” said Haass. “If the Syrians continue to slaughter — as I believe they probably would — their fellow citizens as the civil war continues, then the United States has other means rather than direct military participation to counter that. And that’s where I have been arguing, will continue to argue, for serious arming of the opposition.” 131

In an op-ed in the Washington Post, CFR senior fellow for Middle East and Africa studies Robert Danin called for a military commitment that would “send a message to Assad”:

But if the Obama administration wants to send a message to Assad that he accurately understands, the United States must provide not only a credible response to his recent use of chemical weapons but also make him believe that response is part of a larger strategy to compel him to stop slaughtering his own people — by any means.

Such an approach would require a US commitment to doing more than limited strikes against facilities related to chemical weapons. But it is the only message Assad will understand. 132

American Enterprise Institute
Industry ties: The American Enterprise Institute does not disclose its corporate donor base but its trustees and fellows have significant ties to the defense industry.

* Trustee Daniel D’Aniello is co-founder and Chairman of the Carlyle Group, the majority shareholder of Booz Allen Hamilton. 133

* Trustee John Faraci sits on the board of directors of United Technologies Corporation, an aerospace and aviation manufacturing company. 134

* Trustee Dick Cheney is the former Vice President of the United States, former CEO of Halliburton, and a famed Washington, DC hawk. 135

* Senior Fellow Thomas Donnelly was the director of strategic communications and initiatives for Lockheed Martin. 136

* Fred Kagan, director of the Critical Threats Project [137], is the husband of ISW director Kim Kagan. Both were criticized in the Washington Post for “pro bono” senior advisory work to General Petraeus. 138

Syria commentary: Individuals associated with the American Enterprise Institute were cited in 15 articles on intervention in Syria.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed former Senators Lieberman and Kyl, co-chairmen of the American Enterprise Institute’s American Internationalism Project, derided inaction in Syria as detrimental to national security, a betrayal of US allies in the region, and an ominous “green-light” for Iran and Putin:

But none of this should blind us from a larger truth: Regardless of how we got here, failure to authorize military force against Assad now will have far-reaching and profoundly harmful consequences for American national security.

This is no longer just about the conflict in Syria or even the Middle East. It is about American credibility. Are we a country that our friends can trust and our enemies fear? Or are we perceived as a divided and dysfunctional superpower in retreat, whose words and warnings are no longer meaningful? 139

This doomsday scenario of “green-lighting” the hypothetical ambitions of Iran and North Korea was echoed by AEI scholar Michael Rubin in comments to the Associated Press:

“President Obama issued those words — red line — a little more than a year ago,” said Rubin. “If you draw a line in the sand and you allow your opponent to cross, then that’s not an issue of confidence only in Syria, but that’s something the North Koreans will be watching, the Iranians will be watching and potentially other rogues around the globes will be watching. So the whole idea of a symbolic strike is to say ‘you can’t cross the line.'” 140

Atlantic Council
Industry ties: Supporters of the Atlantic Council are grouped into sponsor circles of increasing access depending on the financial commitment to the organization. Donors giving less than $25,000 are designated as “Other Supporters”:

* Global Leaders Circle ($100,000+): SAIC, EADS, Lockheed Martin

* Chairman’s Circle ($50,000+): Raytheon

* President’s Circle ($25,000+): Boeing

* Other Supporters: General Dynamics, Northrop 141

In addition to direct support from defense industry contractors, the Atlantic Council maintains its own stable of connected directors and advisors:

* Former National Security Advisor Stephen J Hadley, profiled above, is a director for the Atlantic Council and a director at Raytheon. 142

* Director James Cartwright, also profiled above, is also a director for Raytheon and an advisor for TASC. 143

* Advisor Robert J Stevens is the former CEO and currently serving as chairman of Lockheed Martin. 144

* Advisor General John Jumper was the CEO and Chairman of SAIC until September 27, 2013, when the company split off its national security, health, and engineering businesses as a new public company called Leidos. Jumper now serves as the CEO and Chairman of Leidos. 145, 146

* Director Thomas M Culligan is senior vice president for Raytheon. 147

* Director Admiral Edmund Giambastiani Jr serves as a director for Boeing. 148

* Atlantic Council Chairman James L Jones was formerly a director for Boeing and General Dynamics. 149

Syria commentary: Analysts with the Atlantic Council were cited in 14 articles on intervention in Syria.

Frederic C Hof, a senior fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East, wrote that limited, symbolic strikes were worse than doing nothing and mused on the image of American weakness portrayed in such an intervention scenario in an interview with the Christian Science Monitor:

On the other hand, if the attack is limited in scope and duration, it could send entirely the wrong signal to the Assad regime.

“The more limited and symbolic it is the more disastrous it would be for the US and its partners . . . . It would be worse than doing nothing,” says Frederic C. Hof, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East who previously served as the Obama administration’s liaison with the Syrian opposition.

“It would only confirm Assad’s view that it is safe to walk up to the president of the United States and slap him in the face, as appears to have been the case in this most recent incident,” he adds, in reference to last week’s chemical attack, believed to be the deadliest single poison gas attack in quarter of a century. 150

Center for American Progress
Industry ties: Although considered dovish by defense policy standards, the Center for American Progress’ business alliance and analysts have ties to large defense contractors.

CAP’s business alliance was revealed in a Nation article that exposed its undisclosed corporate donors. Among these donors were two of the biggest names in the defense industry, Lockheed Martin and Boeing. 151

These ties extend into their roster of experts. CAP’s senior vice president for national security and international policy, Rudy de Leon, was senior vice president of Boeing; CAP senior fellow Scott Lilly was a lobbyist for Lockheed Martin. Several senior staff at the Albright Stonebridge Group, a commercial diplomacy firm, have ties to CAP, including Madeleine Albright and Carol Browner, both board members, and Brian Katulis and Richard Verma, both senior fellows with a national security focus. Former Raytheon and SAIC director John Deutch is a CAP trustee.

Syria commentary: The Center for American Progress was the least cited of the think tanks profiled, appearing in 13 articles on intervention in Syria.

Larry Korb, a former Pentagon official and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, said that intervention would be a foregone conclusion if not for the looming shadow of Iraq. From AFP:

“It’s the elephant in the room,” said Larry Korb, a former Pentagon official and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. “Had we not had the Iraq war, there would be no real question here,” he said, suggesting that proposed strikes on Syria would have been “approved overwhelmingly” by Congress. 152

In addition to providing their own commentary, the Center for American Progress provided a platform for UN Ambassador Samantha Power to promote military strikes as the sole available strategy to avoid green-lighting future atrocities. From the New York Times:

Warning that President Bashar al-Assad of Syria has barely put a dent in his chemical weapons stockpile, President Obama’s new envoy to the United Nations said on Friday that a failure to intervene in Syria would “give a green light to outrages that will threaten our security and haunt our conscience” for decades to come.

“We have exhausted the alternatives,” Ms. Power said. “For more than a year, we have pursued countless policy tools short of military force to try to dissuade Assad.” 153

The “green-lighting” narrative was echoed by other commentators and think tanks including conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute.


1 The Lead with Jake Tapper, “Syria Crisis”, CNN (September 2, 2013). Accessed at:
2 “Committee Charter”, Raytheon. Accessed at:
3 “Committee Charter”, Raytheon. Accessed at:
4 Form 4 Stephen J Hadley, Raytheon Co (June 6, 2013). Accessed at:
5 “Our Work”, RiceHadleyGates LLC. Accessed at:
6 “Stephen J Hadley”, Accessed at:
7 Stephen J Hadley, “To stop Iran, Obama must enforce red lines with Assad”, Washington Post (September 8, 2013). Accessed at:; Andrea Mitchell Reports, “Crisis in Syria”, MSNBC (September 5, 2013). Accessed at:; The Lead with Jake Tapper, “Interview With New York Congressman Charles Rangel”, CNN (September 5, 2013) Accessed at:
8 Ben Terris, “Obama (Finally) Reaches Out to Republicans. But Is It Too Little, Too Late?”, National Journal (September 10, 2013). Accessed at:
9 Colleen McCain Nelson, “Obama Finds Unlikely Allies, Foes Over Syria Strikes”, Wall Street Journal (September 11, 2013). Accessed at:
10 Political Capital with Al Hunt, “Hadley Says Republicans Must Support Obama on Syria”, Bloomberg Television (September 6, 2013). Accessed at:
11 Form 4 James E Cartwright, Raytheon Co (June 3, 2013). Accessed at:
12 “General James Cartwright”, Accessed at:
13 Michael Isikoff, “Ex-Pentagon general target of leak investigation, sources say”, NBC News (June 27, 2013). Accessed at:
14 This Week, “Secretary of State John Kerry”, ABC News (August 31, 2013). Accessed at:
15 “Frances Townsend”, Accessed at:
16 Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, “US Preparing for Larger Air Attack in Syria”, CNN (September 5, 2013). Accessed at:; Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, “Will US Strike Syria?”, CNN (August 29,2013). Accessed at:;
17 Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, “Crisis in Syria”, CNN (August 28, 2013). Accessed at:
18 Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, “Syria Showdown in the Senate”, CNN (September, 3 2013). Accessed at:
19 Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, “President Obama Weighs Syria Options”, CNN (August 30, 2013)> Accessed at:; Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, “President Obama to Address Nation on Syria”, CNN (September 10,2013). Accessed at:
20 “The SIPRI Top 100 arms-producing and military services companies in the world excluding China, 2011”, SIPRI (2011). Accessed at:
21 “Top 100 Contractors Fiscal Year 2012”, Federal Data Procurement System. Accessed at:
22 “Overview”, DC Capital Partners. Accessed at:
23 General Anthony Zinni”, Accessed at:
24 Ernesto Lodoño and Ed O’Keefe, “Imminent US strike on Syria could draw nation into civil war”, Washington Post (August 27 2013). Accessed at:; State of the Union with Candy Crowley, “Interview with John Kerry”, CNN (September 1, 2013). Accessed at:; CNN Live Event/Special, “Crisis in Syria: The Debate Begins”, CNN (September 3, 2013). Accessed at:
25 CBS This Morning, “US “committed” to Syria action, will look weak to Assad if it doesn’t act, retired general says”, CBS (August 29, 2013). Accessed at:–committed-to-syria-action-will-look-weak-to-assad-if-it-doesnt-act-retired-general-says/
26 State of the Union with Candy Crowley, “Interview with Ron Johnson, Bob Casey”, CNN (September 15,2013). Accessed at: tml
27 Beacon Global Strategies. Accessed at:
28 Zachary Fryer-Biggs, “Clinton Allies Join Bush Alum To Form New Consulting Group”, Defense News (September 3, 2013). Accessed at:
29 State of the Union with Candy Crowle, “Interview with John Kerry”, CNN (September 1, 2013). Accessed at:;
29 The Lead with Jake Tapper, “Did Obama Administration Lack In Preparedness To Deal With Syrian Chemical Attack?”, CNN (September 2, 2013). Accessed at:;
29 Andrea Mitchell Reports, “Bash: US will ‘deter, punish and degrade’ in Syria”, MSNBC (August 27, 2013). Accessed at:; The Lead with Jake Tapper, “Will US Strike Syria?”, CNN (August 27, 2013). Accessed at:; The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell, MSNBC (August 29, 2013). Accessed at:
30 Hardball With Chris Matthews, NBC News (August 30, 2013). Accessed at:
31 “Aerospace”, Entegris. Accessed at:
32 “R Nicholas Burns”, Accessed at:
33 State of the Union with Candy Crowley, “Interview with Ron Johnson, Bob Casey”, CNN (September 15, 2013). Accessed at:; Nicholas Burns, “Diplomacy to the rescue in Syria?”, Boston Globe (September 12,2013). Accessed at: http://”, CNN (September 15, 2013). Accessed at: www.”; Studio B with Shepard Smith, “Why the US should still keep military action on the table”, Fox News (September 10, 2013). Accessed at:
34 Nicholas Burns, “Response is fundamental to a world of civility and justice”, Boston Globe (September 7, 2013). Accessed at:
35 State of the Union with Candy Crowley, “Interview with John Kerry”, CNN (September 1, 2013). Accessed at:
36 “William S Cohen”, Accessed at:
37 The Daily Rundown, “How does Obama handle the Middle East mess?”, MSNBC (August 22, 2013). Accessed at:; CNN Newsroom, “Obama Talks Syria, Builds US Support; Obama Vows “No Boots On The Ground”, CNN (September 4, 2013). Accessed at:; Political Capital with Al Hunt, “Cohen on Syria, Chemical Arms”, Bloomberg TV (August 30, 2013). Accessed at:; Andrea Mitchell, “Decision still not made on Syria strike”, MSNBC (August 29, 2013). Accessed at:; Squawk on the Street, “President Obama sending ‘mixed messages'”, CNBC (September 11, 2013). Accessed at:; Power Lunch, “The conflict in Syra”, CNBC (August 29, 2013). Accessed at:; Closing Bell, “Syria cast shawdo over G-20 Summit”, CNBC (September 6, 2013). Accessed at:
38 CNN Newsroom, “9/11 Museum Still under Construction”, CNN (September 11, 2013). Accessed at:
39 “Gen Wesley K. Clark, (ret)”, Wesley K. Clark & Associates, LLC. Accessed at:
40 “ Awarded Contract to Connect American Manufacturing,” (August 2, 2012). Accessed at:
41 “Wesley K Clark”, Accessed at:
42 All Things Considered, “Retired Gen. Wesley Clark Talks about Precedents and Syria”, NPR (August 27, 2013). Accessed at:; Fareed Zakaria GPS, “GPS Shadow National Security Council Discusses Syria”, CNN (September 8, 2013). Accessed at:;
42 The Ed Show, MSNBC. Accesed at:
43 Wesley Clark, “Syria vs. Kosovo”, USA Today (August 30, 2013). Accessed at:
44 Erin Burnett Outfront, “Senate Committee Authorizes Military Force In Syria”, CNN (September 4, 2013). Accessed at:
45 “Roger Cressey”, Booz Allen Hamilton. Accessed at:
46 “Roger Cressey”, Greater Talent Network. Accessed at:
47 The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell, MSNBC.Accessed at:
48 Richard Engel, Jim Miklaszewski, Ghazi Balkiz, & Robert Windrem, “Extremist element among Syrian rebels a growing worry”, NBC News (September 10, 2013). Accessed at:
49 “Press Release”, Omnis (April 7, 2008). Accessed at:
50 “Charles A Duelfer, Chairman o the Board of Directors”, Omnis. Accessed at:
51 NewsHour, “World Waits for ‘Slam Dunk’ Evidence That Assad Regime Used Chemical Weapons”, PBS (August 29, 2013). Accessed at:; NewsHour, “What Are the Ground Rules of Transferring Weapons to International Control?”, PBS (September 10, 2013). Accessed at:; Morning Edition, “UN Inspectors Try to Get to Site of Alleged Chemical Attack”, NPR (August 22, 2013). Accessed at:; Weekend Edition, “The Ins And Outs Of Securing Chemical Weapons”, NPR (September 14, 2013). Accessed at:; Barbara Crossette, “How to Disarm During a Civil War”, The Nation (September 16, 2013). Accessed at:; Martin Chulov, Mona Mahmood and Ian Sample, “Syria conflict: chemical weapons blamed as hundreds reported killed”, The Guardian (August 22, 2013). Accessed at:
52 NewsHour, “Chemical Weapons Declaration May Offer ‘First, Key Tipoff’ of Assad’s Intentions”, PBS (September 16, 2013). Accessed at:
53 “Amb. Adam Ereli”, Mercury. Accessed at:
54 Amb. Adam Ereli, Twitter. Accessed at:;
54 Happening Now, “Alleged Syrian chemical attack: France calls for force”, Fox News (August 22, 2013). Accessed at:
55 The Interview, J. Adam Ereli, former US ambassador to Bahrain (2007-2011)”, France 24 (September 3, 2013). Accessed at:; David Blair, Peter Foster, Philip Sherwell, & Roland Oliphant, “Russia and US to hold crunch talks on Syria chemcial weapons plan”, The Telegraph (September 11, 2013). Accessed at:; Scott Stearns, “US Cannot ‘Conclusively Determine’ Chemical Weapons Use in Syria”, Voice of America (August 23, 2013). Accessed at:; Sarah Young and Patrick Michael, “Obama should strike Syria,
says diplomat”, Khaleej Times (September 4, 2010). Accessed at:;
Studio B with Shepard Smith, “International resistance to strike on Syria”, Fox News (September 2, 2013). Accessed at:
56 Awad Mustafa, ” US ‘no option’ but to order Syria strike, says former State Department official”, The National (September 10, 2013). Accessed at:
57 “Press Releases”, The Boston Consulting Group. Accessed at:
58 “Cablegate’s Cables: Full-text search for ‘Boston Consulting-Group'”, WikiLeaks Accessed at:
59 “Dubai Founded in 2007”, Boston Consulting Group. Accessed at:
60 “Michele Flournoy”, Accessed at:
61 “Michael Hayden” Accessed at: hMItMImIp://
62 “General Michael V. Hayden”, Chertoff Group. Accessed at:
63 CNN Live Event/Special, “Crisis in Syria: The Debate Begins”, CNN (September 3 2013). Accessed at:; The Lead with Jake Tapper, “Syria Crisis”, CNN (September 2, 2013). Accessed at:; The Situation Room, “Crisis in Syria; Interview With Michigan Congressman Mike Rogers” CNN (August 29 2013). Accessed at:; Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, “President Obama Blames Chemical Attack on Assad Regime”, CNN (August 28 2013). Accessed at:
64 Piers Morgan, “Interview with John McCain; What Should the US Do in Syria?” CNN (August 9 2013)
65 “Colin H. Kahl” curriculum vitae. Accessed at:
66 Glenn Thrush and Jennifer Epstein, “The Lonely President” (August 29 2013) Accessed at:;
66 David Lerman and John Walcott, “Obama’s Push for Syria Strike Revives Calls to Rebels”, (September 4 2013). Accessed at:
67 Adam Entous and Carol E. Lee , “Quietly, Some Allies Push for Action”, The Wall Street Journal (August 31 2013). Accessed at:
68 “Brian Katulis,” Albright Stonebridge Accessed at:
69 “Politics Nation with Al Sharpton”, Accessed at:
70 Brian Katulis, Silent International Partners in President Obama’s Possible Syria strike may be Critical” New York Daily News, (August 30 2013). Accessed at:; Jennifer Skalka Tulumello, “Syria crisis: Dovish Democrats urge Obama to consult Congress, (August 29, 2013). Accessed at:; David Lerman and Indira A. R. Lakhsmanan “Obama Faces Toughest Foreign Policy Challenge in Syria” , (August 26 2013). Accessed at:; Paul Richter, “Russia’s Syria Proposal Offers Major Powers Clear Advantages”, Los Angeles TImes (September 11 2013). Accessed at:; US to Have Silent Partners on Syria, Katulis Says”, Accessed at: 66LHnK9lGvA.html
71 “John M. Keane,” General Dyamanics Accessed at:
72 The Sipri Top 100 arms producing and military services companies in the world excluding China, 2011″ Accessed at:
73 “Federal Procurement Data System- Next Generation”, Accessed at:
74 “The SCP Team”, SCP Partners. Accessed at:
75 Editor, “If The US Strikes, What Are The Targets Inside Syria?”(August 30 2013). Acccessed at:; “Search Results: Keane”, Fox News. Accessed at:
76 Lou Dobbs Tonight, “Has US Lost Strategic Opportunities in Syria?”, Fox News (September 18, 2013). Accessed at:;
77 PBS NewsHour, “Can Obama Convince Congress to Approve a Limited Air Strike?” PBS (September 2 2013), Accessed at:
78 Jeff Blumenthal, “Patrick Murphy Following Up Congress with Fox Rothschild Job”, Philadelphia Business Journal (January 3 2013). Accessed at:
79 The Cycle, ” The False Choice on Syria”, MSNBC (September 11 2013). Accessed at: http://video.msnbc.msn.c om/the-cycle/52985286#52985286; Politics Nation with AL Sharpton, MSNBC. Acessed at:; Now with Alex Wagner, “How Feasible is a Limited Strike in Syria”, MSNBC (September 11 2013). Accessed at:
80 Otis Bilodeau, “Madeleine Albright Raises $329 Million for New Fund(Update 4)”, Bl oomberg (January 18 2007). Accessed at: http:/
81 “Madeleine Albright”, Accessed at:
82 David Nakamura, “Madeleine Albright pushes Congress in Support of Syria Resolution”, Washington Post (September 6 2013). Accessed at:
83 Face the Nation, “Levin, Corker, Albright”, CBS (September 15 2013). Accessed at:
84 David Nakamura, “Madeleine Albright pushes Congress in Support of Syria Resolution”, Washington Post (September 6 2013). Accessed at:
85 “James A “Spider” Marks”, Accessed at:
86 “Our Team, Why We’re Different”, Willowdale Services. Accessed at:
87 The Situation Room, “Russica Submits Plan to US”,CNN (September 11 2013). Accessed at:; Piers Morgan, “A Strike on Syria?”, CNN (August 28 2013). Accessed at:; Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, “President Obama Weighs Syria Options”,CNN (August 30 2013). Accessed at:; Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, “US Preparing for Larger Air Attack in Syria”, CNN (September 5 2013). Accessed at:; Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, “US Preparing Possible Military Strike on Syria”, CNN(August 27 2013). Accessed at:;CNN Newsroom ,CNN (September 14 2013). Accessed at:;CNN Newsroom, “Obama Press Congress on Syria Strike”,CNN (September 7 2013). Accessed at:; The Lead with Jake Tapper, “Syria Options”, CNN (August 29 2013). Accessed at:; The Lead with Jake Tapper, “Will US Strike Syria?” ,CNN (August 27 2013). Accessed at:
88 CNN Newsroom, ‘Mass Grave Dug in Damascus”, CNN (August 27 2013). Accessed at:
89 “Chuck Nash”, Accessed at:
90 America’s Newsroom, “Kerry’s Syria Argument ‘terribly naive'”, Fox News (September 10 2013). Accessed at:; Markets News, “Can the US Build International Support for Syria?”, Fox News (September 5 2013). Accessed at:
91 America’s Newsroom, “Why Congress Should Approve or Not Approve a Syria Strike”, Fox News (September 3, 2013). Accessed at:
92 “On Air Personalities: Captain Chuck Nash”, Fox New Accessed at:
93 “Home,” Aamina. Accessed at:
94 “John D Negroponte”, Accessed at:
95 Katie Glueck, “Bush Vets Split on Syria”, Politico (August 30, 2013) Accessed at:; State of the Union with Candy Crowley, “Interview with John Kerry”, CNN (September 1, 2013). Accessed at:
96 On The Record, “Short-term versus long-term strategy in Syria”, Fox News (September 5, 2013) Accessed at:
97 “Clients”, Colgen. Accessed at:
98 Robert Scales, “A war the Pentagon doesn’t want”, Washington Post (September 5, 2013). Accessed at:
99 On the Record with Greta Van Susteren, “Are long-term military strikes on Syria part of US plan?”, Fox News (August 27, 2013). Accessed at:; On the Record with Greta Van Susteren, “What would a short-term Syria strategy look like?”, Fox News (August 30, 2013). Accessed at:; On the Record with Greta Van Susteren, “Why the military is opposed to strikes in Syria”. Fox News (September 11, 2013). Accessed at:
100 “Annual Report 20”, Brookings (2012). Pages 35-37. Accessed at:
101 “David Rubenstein”, Accessed at:
102 “Kenneth M Duberstein”, Accessed at:
103 Eloise Lee and Robert Johnson, “The 25 Biggest Defense Contractors In America”, Business Insider (March 13, 2012). Accessed at:
104 “Ronald Sanders”, Accessed at:
105 “Enterprise Leadership: The Essential Framework for Today’s Government Leaders”, Brookings (August 14, 2013). Accessed at:
106 “Thad W Allen”, Accessed at:
107 Associated Press, “Difference Aside, Iraq War Haunts Obama on Syria”, NPR (August 31, 2013). Accessed at:
108 Associated Press, “With Security Council divided, US and allies look beyond UN in justifying Syria strike”, Fox News (August 27, 2013). Accessed at:

109 “Board of Trustees”, Center for Strategic and International Studies. Accessed at:
110 “Counselors”, Center for Strategic and International Studies. Accessed at:
111 “John J Hamre”, Accessed at:
112 “James McNerney Jr”, Accessed at:
113 “Margaret Sidney Ashworth”, Accessed at:
114 “Thomas M Culligan”, Accessed at:
115 “Gregory Dahlberg”, Accessed at:
116 “Timothy Keating”, Accessed at:
117 “Gregory S Gallopoulos”, Accessed at:
118 “Ray L Hunt”, Accessed at:
119 “James L Jones”, Accessed at:
120 Adam Entous, Dion Nissenbaum, & Maria Abi-Habib, “Little Doubt Syria Gassed Opposition”, Wall Street Journal (August 26, 2013). Accessed at:
121 Phil Stewart, “Analysis — Surprise or Not, US Strikes Can Still Hurt Assad”, Reuters (September 5, 2013). Accessed at: httpA://
122 Anna Mulrine, “Uncertainty Over How US Military Intervention In Syria Would End”, Christian Science Monitor (September 9, 2013). Accessed at:
123 Rajiv Chandrasekaran, “Civilian analysts gained Petraeus’s ear while he was commander in Afghanistan”, Washington Post (December 18, 2012). Accessed at:
124 “Corporate Council”, Institute for the Study of War. Accessed at:
125 John Hudson, “Architect of Syria War Plan Doubts Surgical Strikes Will Work”, Foreign Policy (August 26, 2013). Accessed at:
126 Tony Capaccio & Gopal Ratnam, “Delay for Syria Debate Lets Pentagon Spot Missile Targets”, Bloomberg (September 6, 2013). Accessed at:
127 Mark Hosenball and Phil Stewart, “Kerry Portrait of Syria Rebels at Odds With Intelligence Reports”, Reuters (September 5, 2013). Accessed at:
128 “About”, Council on Foreign Relations. Accessed at:
129 “Corporate Members”, Council on Foreign Relations. Accessed at:
130 “Richard N Haass”, Accessed at:
131 Associated Press, “US Plans for Missile Strikes Against Syria as Questions Swirl About the Endgame”, Fox News (August 27, 2013). Accessed at:
132 Robert M Danin, “Send Assad a Message He Will Understand”, Washington Post (September 6, 2013). Accessed at:
133 “Daniel D Aniello”, Accessed at:
134 “John V Faraci”, Accessed at:
135 “Dick Cheney”, Accessed at:
136 “Thomas Donnelly”, Accessed at:
137 “Frederick Kagan”, Accessed at:
138 Rajiv Chandrasekaran, “Civilian analysts gained Petraeus’s ear while he was commander in Afghanistan’, Washington Post (December 18, 2012). Accessed at:
139 Joe Lieberman and Jon Kyl, “Inaction in Syria Threatens US Security”, Wall Street Journal (September 5, 2013). Accessed at:
140 Associated Press, “US plans for missile strike against Syria as questions swirl about the endgame”, Fox News (August 27, 2013). Accessed at:
141 “Supporters”, Atlantic Council. Accessed at:
142 “Stephen J Hadley”, Accessed at:
143 “General James Cartwright”, Accessed at:
144 “Robert J Stevens”, Accessed at:
145 “General John P Jumper”, Accessed at:
146 Joann S. Lublin, “Defense Contractor SAIC Set to Divide Mission With Spinoff”, The Wall Street Journal (September 10, 2013). Accessed at:
Interestingly, Jumper explains SAIC’s decision to spin-off Leidos in terms of conflicts of interest: “Our services and solutions businesses are both highly involved in government. The solutions side is also about a $2-billion commercial health, environment and energy business. Over time, we came up against serious conflicts of interest. If services side people were giving technical assistance to government agencies, you couldn’t bid on providing solutions after being part of proposing them.”
147 “Thomas M Culligan”, Accessed at:
148 “Edmund P Giambastiani Jr”, Accessed at:
149 “James L Jones”, Accessed at:
150 Nicholas Blanford, “How a US Strike on Syria on Syria Might Play Out”, The Christian Science Monitor (August 28, 2013). Accessed at:
151 Ken Silverstein, “The Secret Donors Behind the Center for American Progress and Other Think Tanks”, The Nation (June 10, 2013). Accessed at:,1#
152 “Iraq war debacle haunts US debate on Syria”, Agence France-Presse (September 9, 2013). Accessed at:
153 Sheryl Gay Stolberg, “Envoy Says Syria Inaction Would Give Green Light to Outrages”, New York Times (September 6, 2013). Accessed at:

Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.