IAEA Report to Again Confirm Iran Is Abiding by Nuclear Deal

May 23rd, 2014 - by admin

Jason Ditz / AntiWar.com & Fredrik Dahl / Reuters – 2014-05-23 01:01:11

IAEA Report to Again Confirm Iran Abiding by Nuclear Deal

IAEA Report to Again Confirm Iran Abiding by Nuclear Deal
Jason Ditz / AntiWar.com

(May 22, 2014) — The International Atomic Energy Agency and Iran were both quiet in the wake of a meeting earlier this week, leading to speculation of some new dispute on their ongoing “investigations” into Iran’s past activities. Diplomats say the IAEA was just waiting for a Friday report to address the agreement, however, and will once again confirm that Iran is abiding by the P5+1 interim nuclear deal.

In addition to that, the report is also expected to address some new agreements on information sharing related to the investigations, and is expected to take the wind out of the sails of those alleging Iran is stonewalling them.

The IAEA has praised Iran for its quick implementation of the P5+1 interim pact, which expires in late July. Negotiations are ongoing to replace it with a permanent settlement, though they have only just started in talks on the wording of the text.

UN Report to Show Iran Complying with Nuclear Deal — Diplomats
Fredrik Dahl / Reuters

VIENNA (May 22, 2014) — A UN atomic watchdog report due on Friday is likely to confirm that Iran is curbing its nuclear activities as agreed with world powers in a landmark accord last year, diplomatic sources said. They said the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) would probably verify in a monthly update that Iran is living up to its part of the interim agreement struck in November, designed to buy time for talks on a long-term deal.

The update “will show continuing compliance,” one Western diplomat said on Thursday.

The report is also expected to include information about Iran’s agreement this week to address two issues in a long-stalled IAEA investigation into suspected atomic bomb research by Tehran, which denies any such work. The undertaking could advance the research the IAEA is trying to carry out, and may also help Iran and six world powers to negotiate a broader deal to end a dispute that has raised fears of a new Middle East war.

But Western capitals, aware of past failures to get Iran to cooperate with the IAEA, are likely to remain sceptical until it has fully implemented the agreed steps and others to clear up allegations of illicit atomic work.

The IAEA-Iran talks are separate from those between Tehran and the six powers — United States, France, Germany, Britain, China and Russia. But they are complementary as both focus on fears that Iran may covertly be seeking the means and expertise to assemble nuclear weapons, which it denies.

US officials say it is vital for Iran to address the IAEA’s concerns if Washington and five other powers are to reach a long-term nuclear accord with Iran by a self-imposed deadline of July 20. But the Islamic state’s repeated denials of any nuclear bomb aspirations will make it hard for it to admit to any wrongdoing in the past without losing face.

Under last year’s deal — made possible by the June election of pragmatist Hassan Rouhani as Iranian president after years of increasingly tense relations with the West — Iran scaled back its most sensitive work in exchange for some sanctions easing.

Diplomats and experts say it will be much more difficult to agree the terms of a final deal, as Iran and the powers remain far apart on the permissible scope of its nuclear programme, especially regarding its uranium enrichment capacity.

US and Iranian officials said little progress was made in the latest round of negotiations, which ended in Vienna on Friday. They will meet again in June as they step up their push to try to clinch a long-elusive agreement. Rouhani said in Shanghai on Thursday that the talks had reached an important and tough juncture, but a deal was still possible by the July deadline.

Gary Samore, until last year the top nuclear proliferation expert on US President Barack Obama’s national security staff, predicted it would be “very difficult” to achieve that goal. But, he said in a speech, “both sides have a strong interest to keep the diplomatic process alive because neither wants to return to previous cycle of escalation of increased sanctions and increased nuclear activities with increased risk of war.”

The United States and its allies want Iran to reduce its uranium enrichment programme significantly to deny it the capability to produce an atomic bomb quickly. Iran has made it clear that it will resist such demands.

Refined uranium can be used to fuel nuclear power plants, which is Iran’s stated goal, but can also provide material for bombs if processed much further, which the West fears may be Tehran’s ultimate aim.

Russia, Iran Near Deal on Building
Eight Nuclear Power Plants

Iran Seeks More Power Plants to Free Up More Oil Exports

Jason Ditz / AntiWar.com

(May 22, 2014) — Officials familiar with the situation say that Russia and Iran are close on a deal to build as many as eight new nuclear power-generating reactors inside Iran, and that such a pact might be signed later this year.

Russia built Iran’s Bushehr Power Plant, and the reported deal suggested two of the new reactors would be placed inside the same compound as the existing plant, with others elsewhere in the nation.

Iran has been keen to increase their nuclear power generation, not only to satisfying growing electricity demands, but to free up some of the oil used in oil-burning plants for export.

Though the nuclear power plants pose no weapons risk, Western nations have objected to Iran’s enrichment facilities, which produce fuel for the Bushehr Plant domestically, arguing that the enrichment sites could conceivably be re-purposed to produce weapons-grade uranium.

Which is not possible as a practical matter because the enrichment facilities are under constant video surveillance by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The addition of more reactors might spark more Western condemnations, since Iran would naturally need more fuel for more plants, though the final deal with Russia might include Russian provision of the fuel as well as the plants.

Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.