Medea Benjamin and Elliot Swain / Alternet & Jess Aloe / The Burlington Free Press – 2018-03-07 00:45:06
Congress Keeps Funding a War Machine
That the Public Should Divest From
Both parties line their pockets
With profits from the Arms Trade
Medea Benjamin and Elliot Swain / Alternet & Portside
(March 5, 2018) â€“ In recent budget negotiations, Senate Democrats agreed to a boost in military spending that exceeded the cap for fiscal 2018 by $70 billion, bringing the total request to an enormous $716 billion. Inevitably, this means more Pentagon contracts will be awarded to private corporations that use endless war to line their pockets.
Democrats capitulated to this massive increase without so much as a scuffle. But the move hardly comes as a surprise, given how much money flows from weapons makers to the coffers of congressional campaigns for both parties.
While the majority of the weapons money goes to Republicans, Democratic Senators Tim Kaine and Bill Nelson appear in the top ten recipients of campaign contributions — in both chambers and parties — from military contractors in 2017 and 2018. Northrop Grumman gave$785,000 to Democratic candidates since 2017.
Hillary Clinton took over $1 million from the industry in 2016. Even progressive darlings like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders take money from weapons manufacturers, and Sanders supported Boeing’s disastrous F-35 because his home state had a financial stake in the program.
If neither major political party will stand up to this status quo, what can be done?
One answer might be found in the recent push to divest from fossil fuel companies undertaken by, among others, Norway and New York City. By December of 2016, 688 institutions, representing over $5 trillion in assets, had divested from fossil fuels.
In an interview with The Guardian, author Naomi Klein described the fossil fuel divestment effort as “a process of delegitimizing” the sector and of affirming that it yields “odious profits.”
An analogous campaign to delegitimize beneficiaries of war is long overdue. In addition to pressuring our members of Congress to refuse campaign donations from weapons manufacturers and war profiteers, we must mount a divestment effort at the institutional and municipal level. Investment in war must come at the cost of public disgrace.
University students can request holdings information from their schools. Often, investments in military corporations are bundled into more complex financial instruments whose investments are not publicly disclosed.
The content of these instruments can be determined by contacting a university board of trustees or endowment manager. Then a divestment campaign can be launched, building campus coalitions, creating petitions, organizing direct actions and passing resolutions through student government bodies. A helpful guide for student activists can be found here.
Activists can launch municipal divestment efforts by determining the holdings of city pension, utility, or insurance funds. In 2017 the US Conference of Mayors, the national association of cities with populations over 30,000, adopted a resolution acknowledging the need to transform funding priorities away from war-making and into local communities.
Divestment campaigns can leverage this resolution in order to hold city leaders to their word. More information for activists at the city level is available here.
Divestment offers an alternate means of addressing the blight of war profiteering in an era in which traditional political routes have been closed by our craven representatives. It also brings the message into smaller communities — communities that crumble while defense contractors live in luxury.
A new coalition of about 70 groups across the country has formed to launch a Divest From the War Machine campaign. The coalition is inviting all those who are disgusted by the war profiteers to help galvanize university, city, pension and faith institutions to divest from war. Learn more at: www.divestfromwarmachine.org/
In a 2015 speech to the US Congress, the very Congress that is so beholden to the war machine, Pope Francis asked why deadly weapons were being sold to those who inflict untold suffering on society. The answer, he said, was money, “money that is drenched in blood, often innocent blood.”
Looking at a room full of congresspeople who benefit from what he called “merchants of death,” the Pope called for the elimination of the arms trade. One way to heed the Pope’s call is to eat away at the profits of those who make a killing on killing.
Medea Benjamin is cofounder of the peace group CodePink. Her latest book is Kingdom of the Unjust: Behind the US-Saudi Connection (OR Books, September 2016).
Elliot Swain is a Baltimore-based activist, public policy graduate student and researcher for CODEPINK.
Ben and Jerry’s Co-founder Ben Cohen
Arrested during F-35 Protest
Jess Aloe / The Burlington Free Press
The F-35’s Complicated Vermont History
BURLINGTON, VT (March 6, 2018) — Ben and Jerry’s Homemade Inc. co-founder Ben Cohen was arrested in downtown Burlington Saturday afternoon for repeatedly violating the city’s noise ordinances while holding a “public demonstration” about the F-35 fighter planes, police said.
Activists opposed to the impending basing of the F-35s played jet noise from a tower of speakers mounted on the back of a pickup truck at a level they said simulated what it would be like to be underneath the flight path.
Cohen was one of three people arrested for disorderly conduct shortly after 3 p.m., said Lt. Matthew Sullivan. Cohen was escorted from the intersection of Church and Main streets in handcuffs.
Burlington’s noise ordinances say that tickets should be issued for the first two violations and allow for an arrest on the third. Sullivan said police were able to obtain witness statements about the first two incidents and witnessed the third personally. The three activists would be issued citations to appear in court and released this afternoon, Sullivan said.
Burlington voters will get a chance to weigh in on whether city officials should oppose the basing, which is scheduled for 2019, on Tuesday. Police told the activists they were violating the ordinance and would be getting tickets earlier in the day, Cohen said around noon after playing the noise for six minutes, adding that people had complained about the disruption.
“Of course, that’s exactly the point,” Cohen said.
Last month, Maj. Gen. Steven Cray, adjutant general of the Vermont Air National Guard, said millions of dollars have been invested in preparing for the F-35s and members of the Guard were deployed around the country training on the plane.
“There is no alternative mission being planned for the Guard,” he said. He said the language of the ballot item, which asks voters if they should advise their representatives to oppose the basing as part of their support for the Guard, is misleading.
Pro-basing advocates have waged their own campaign to convince Burlingtonians to vote “No” on the advisory question. Earlier this week, Frank Cioffi, president of the Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation, held a news conference praising the economic impact of the F-35.
According to NBC5, two F-35 jets will visit Burlington this summer to allow residents to see and hear the new jets in advance of the fall 2019 arrival of 18 planes.
F-35 Petitioners Prevail in Getting Their Version on the Burlington Ballot
Pentagon F-35 Review Unlikely to Affect Vermont
FAA Made F-35 Maps for Some Cities, Just Not S. Burlington
Contact Jess Aloe at 802-660-1874 or email@example.com. Follow her on Twitter @jess_aloe
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.