Congress Must Seize This Opportunity to Repeal 2002 Iraq AUMF
Heather Brandon-Smith / Friends Committee on National Legislation
WASHINGTON, DC (September 10, 2019) – Today, a nationwide group of 62 organizations came together to send an unequivocal message to Congress: Now is the time to repeal the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iraq (2002 AUMF).
In a letter sent to the chairmen and ranking members of the Armed Services Committees in both chambers, the co-signers urged Congress to retain in the final version of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA) the House-passed provision to repeal the nearly 17-year old law that authorized war against the Saddam Hussein regime. The House adopted the provision by a bipartisan vote of 242-180. As the letter explains:
“Repealing the 2002 Iraq AUMF would reassert Congress’ constitutional duty to determine whether and when the United States chooses war. It would remove an outdated force authorization that is not required for any ongoing operations, while protecting against its abuse by this or any future president to justify unforeseen and unauthorized new wars.”
“The 2002 AUMF is an unnecessary and redundant law. But by keeping it in force, we have left it vulnerable to continued abuse from the executive branch,” explained Heather Brandon-Smith, FCNL’s legislative director for militarism and human rights. “Repealing the 2002 AUMF ensures it cannot be exploited to take the United States into new wars that Congress never intended.”
“Congress did not pass the 2002 AUMF to give future presidential administrations carte blanche to wage war,” said Patricia Stottlemyer, associate attorney at Human Rights First. “The authorization was limited in scope, specific in purpose, and constrained by time and geography. Presidents have abused this authorization for far too long, and it’s time for the legislative branch to step up and take back its war-making authority. Continued reliance on outdated and unnecessary war authorizations undermines national security, U.S. leadership in the world, and human rights both at home and abroad.”
“Any decision to authorize war must be considered seriously and exercised responsibly,” said Mandy Smithberger, director for the Center for Defense Information at the Project On Government Oversight. “Keeping this outdated authorization on the books is a betrayal of our troops, and a dereliction of duty by Congress to exercise its constitutional duties.”
“By repealing the 2002 AUMF, Congress would be removing any legal cover Trump imagines he has from this law for a new war in the Middle East, particularly against Iran or one of its proxies, and it would be taking back power that it has ceded to the executive for so many years now,” said Erica Fein, Advocacy Director at Win Without War. “It is also the right thing to do. Sixteen years after the U.S. invasion of Iraq under false pretenses, it is well past time to formally end the United States’ legal excuse for a disastrous and destabilizing war that we had no business waging in the first place.”
• You can view the letter here.
• To learn more, please visit www.fcnl.org.
Heather Brandon-Smith is Legislative Director for Militarism and Human Rights for Friends Committee on National Legislation, a Quaker Lobby in the Public Interest. 245 2nd St. NE | Washington, DC 20002
60-plus Groups Urge Repeal of 2002 AUMF in Defense Policy Bill
(September 10, 2019) — House and Senate negotiators are currently working on a final policy bill that will direct the Pentagon’s efforts over the next year. On Sept. 10, FCNL joined a diverse group of organizations from across the ideological spectrum in sending a letter to House and Senate leaders of the Armed Services Committees. Together they urged them to preserve the Lee amendment to repeal of the 2002 Iraq Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) in the final version of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA).
Re: 2002 Iraq AUMF Repeal Provision in National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020
Dear Chairmen and Ranking Members:
We, the undersigned, are a diverse group of organizations with a range of missions and perspectives from across the ideological spectrum. As you work to reconcile the House and Senate versions of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA), we strongly urge you to retain in the conference version of the bill the provision from the House-passed bill, H.R. 2500, to repeal the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iraq (2002 Iraq AUMF) (PL 107–243). This provision is included in H.R. 2500 as Section 1270W.
Repealing the 2002 Iraq AUMF would reassert Congress’ constitutional duty to determine whether and when the United States chooses war. It would remove an outdated force authorization that is not required for any ongoing operations, while protecting against its abuse by this or any future president to justify unforeseen and unauthorized new wars.
Congress passed the 2002 Iraq AUMF to authorize force against Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi regime in order to defend the United States against the threat posed by the regime’s alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction. While this threat proved unfounded, the mission undertaken pursuant to the 2002 Iraq AUMF – designated “Operation Iraqi Freedom” – began on March 20, 2003, and officially ended on December 11, 2011.
Since this time, the 2002 Iraq AUMF has been repurposed by successive presidents for military activities unrelated to the Saddam Hussein regime. Both the Trump and Obama administrations have used the 2002 Iraq AUMF as supplemental authority for operations that they have claimed are being conducted pursuant to the 2001 AUMF in Iraq and Syria, including operations against ISIS.
Repealing this outdated authorization would put an end to such unconstitutional repurposing of war authorizations without impacting current operations. The 2002 Iraq AUMF has never been cited as the sole authority to justify any current U.S. military operations. Indeed, Acting State Department Legal Adviser Marik String testified in a recent Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing that he was “not aware” of any situation where the administration was relying solely on the 2002 Iraq AUMF for present military operations.
Yet leaving the 2002 Iraq AUMF in place renders it susceptible to misuse by this or a future president. Last year the administration claimed that the 2002 Iraq AUMF authorized the use of force to address “threats to, or stemming from, Iraq” in “in Syria or elsewhere.” This dangerous interpretation goes far beyond congressional intent and serves as a ticking time bomb that paves the way for the Executive Branch to draw the United States into further wars that were not even contemplated, let alone authorized, 17 years ago. Any new war must be specifically approved by Congress, as required under the Constitution.
Article I of the Constitution vests in Congress—as the branch most accountable to the American people—the responsibility to determine whether, when, and where to go to war. Congress should seize the opportunity to exercise its constitutional war powers by repealing the 2002 Iraq AUMF. This would remove an unnecessary force authorization and ensure that it cannot be exploited by the Executive Branch to start new, unauthorized wars.
We strongly urge you to retain in the conference version of the NDAA Section 1270W of H.R. 2500 to repeal the 2002 Iraq AUMF.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
About Face: Veterans Against the War
Action Corps NYC
Action Corps, Indianapolis
American Civil Liberties Union
American Friends Service Committee
Bridges Faith Initiative
Campaign for liberty
Center for Constitutional Rights
Center for International Policy
Center for Victims of Torture
Center on Conscience & War
Coalition for Peace Action
Committee for Responsible Foreign Policy
Congregation of Our Lady of the Good Shepherd, U.S. Provinces
Council for a Livable World
Council on American-Islamic Relations
Defending Rights & Dissent
Disciples Center for Public Witness
Disciples Justice Action Network
Environmentalists Against War
Friends Committee on National Legislation
Foreign Policy for America
Franciscan Action Network
Global Ministries of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) and United Church of Christ
Historians for Peace and Democracy
Human Rights First
Institute for Policy Studies, New Internationalism Project
Interfaith Network on Drone Warfare
International Civil Society Action Network (ICAN)
Just Foreign Policy
Justice for Muslims Collective
Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
Mennonite Central Committee U.S. Washington Office
National Advocacy Center of the Sisters of the Good Shepherd
National Council of Churches
National Iranian American Council
National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies
National Religious Campaign Against Torture
Peace Corps Iran Association
Peace Tax Foundation
Presbyterian Church (USA)
Project On Government Oversight
September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows
The United Methodist Church – General Board of Church and Society
The Yemen Peace Project
Truman Center for National Policy
United Church of Christ
United for Peace and Justice
Win Without War
Women’s Action for New Directions
World BEYOND War