US Space Command Conducts First War Game

September 13th, 2019 - by Tom Roeder and The Gazette / Taskandpurpose.com & Matthew Cox / Military.com

US Space Command’s First Big War Game Is Already Under Way

Tom Roeder and The Gazette / Taskandpurpose.com

 (September 11, 2019) — A secretive war game that examines combat in space kicked off this week in Alabama.

The Schriever War Game, bringing together several military commands, allies and the nation’s intelligence agencies, focuses on a rival nation in Europe starting a “multi-domain” war, a military term that combines traditional land, sea and air combat with space battle and cyberattacks.

The unnamed rival — the military never says Russia or China when it comes to war games — is “seeking to achieve strategic goals by exploiting multi-domain operations,” Air Force Space Command said in a news release.

The event is the first test of the new US Space Command, established in Colorado Springs last month. The command brings together the space efforts of all military services and takes the lead when combat hits orbit.

US Space Command Is Officially Open For Business

It will also test how well America can work with its allies; Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Great Britain were set to join in.

It’s a different kind of war game. The Army regularly throws similar events involving thousands of troops maneuvering on the ground. The Air Force holds exercises in Nevada using dozens of dogfighting planes.

The space war game uses just 360 troops and civilians meeting in the conference rooms of the Alabama-based Air War College.

It does examine a big war, though, with “full spectrum of threats across diverse, multi-domain operating environments to challenge civilian and military leaders, planners and space system operators, as well as the capabilities they employ.”

While the numbers of troops involved are smaller than that of other war games, the changes that could come from the exercise could be much bigger.

In addition to training troops for combat, war games like the Schriever exercise are also used to determine what America needs if it winds up in a similar situation.

That means the Schriever War Game could result in new gear in space and on the ground to deal with war in space.

That is likely needed. The US hasn’t really thought about combat in orbit until the past decade. US satellites have few protections against enemy attacks, and America has few tools to respond, apart from missiles that are primarily designed to take out intercontinental ballistic missiles.

The vulnerability in space comes at a time when the American military has never been more dependent on the services provided through satellites.

From GPS-guided bombs to satellite communications gear in Humvees, American troops can’t fight on the ground or in the air without satellites.

While the existence of the war game is public, don’t expect to hear results.

The outcome of the Schriever game, including whether the bad guys won, is highly classified.

Space Force: To Boldly Go Where No Man Has Gone Before —And Destroy Everything

US Space Command Is Officially Open for Business

Matthew Cox / Military.com 

Editor’s Note: This article by Matthew Cox originally appeared onMilitary.com, a leading source of news for the military and veteran community.

(August 30, 2019) — The Pentagon on Thursday officially established United States Space Command, a precursor to the Space Force military service President Donald Trump has called for.

As the nation’s 11th geographic combatant command, Space Command was created to defend US space-enabled capabilities in this new warfighting domain, said Air Force Gen. John “Jay” Raymond, who assumed command of US Space Command on Thursday.

“Although space is a warfighting domain, our goal is actually to deter a conflict from extending into space; the best way I know how to do that is to be prepared to fight and win if deterrence were to fail,” Raymond told reporters at the Pentagon. “The scope, scale and complexity of the threat to our space capabilities is real, and it’s concerning. We no longer have the luxury of operating in a peaceful and benign domain.”

Space Command is part of a two-pronged effort — which includes a proposal before Congress to create a US Space Force as the sixth branch of the US military — to build a fighting force capable of conducting defensive and offensive operations against potential adversaries seeking to deny America’s access to space, Raymond said.

“Primarily, the countries that have the more significant threats are China and Russia,” he told reporters at the Pentagon. “Our adversaries have had a front row seat to our many successes of integrating space, and they don’t like what they see because it provides us with such great advantage. And they are developing capabilities to negate our access to space.”

Both China and Russia began updating their space capabilities in 2015 to counter those of the United States, said Steve Kitay, deputy assistant secretary of defense for Space Policy.

“There is a perception that space represents an Achilles heel, and that this is an … asymmetric advantage for them to then take on the United States’ power because we project power through space-enabled capabilities,” Kitay said.

The US faces a full spectrum of space-related threats, Raymond added.

“On the lower end of that spectrum, there is reversible jamming of communications satellites and GPS satellites, for example, all the way up to the very destructive kinetic strike of a ground-based missile to blow up a satellite, like China did in 2007,” he said.

The Pentagon had a US Space Command from 1985 to 2002, but it was not a geographic combatant command, Raymond said. It was merged with US Strategic Command following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, as antiterrorism efforts took precedence.

“United States Space Command of today shares the same name as the original command; however, it is designed for a different strategic environment,” he said. “Today’s US Space Command has a sharper focus on protecting and defending our critical space assets.

Space Command will start out with a traditional headquarters made up of about 287 personnel who are currently assigned to the Joint Force Space Component Command and those who have been conducting the space mission of the US Strategic Command, Raymond said.

The Air Force has identified six candidate bases that could serve as the command’s new headquarters. Once the evaluation is complete, the secretary of the Air Force will make the decision, he added.

The new command will have service components from the ArmyNavy, Air Force and Marines and will be organized into two operational elements.

The Combined Force Space Component Command, which Raymond commanded before taking over Space Command, will be elevated to a “combined command to help us integrate with allies more effectively, and that command is going to be focused on integrating space capabilities around the globe throughout all of our … coalition partners,” he said.

Historically, the US hasn’t needed to have allies in space, Raymond said.

“Now we are working very closely with … France, Germany and Japan,” he said. “We exercise together, we train together, we conduct war games together … so this is a big growth area for us.”

The second component is the Joint Task Force for Space Defense, a new organization that will focus on protecting and defending the space domain, Raymond said, adding that he will have a better idea of the new command’s size once the manpower validation process is complete.

Pentagon officials recently reached an agreement with the National Reconnaissance Office that ensures that the DoD intelligence agency “in higher states of conflict … will respond to the direction of the US Space Command commander,” Raymond said.

“We are the best in the world at space today,” he said. “I’m convinced that we need to keep the domain safe for all to use. … I am convinced that our way of life and our way of war depend on space capabilities.”

This article originally appeared on Military.com

Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.